Purina Dog Chow (Dry)

Share

Rating: ★☆☆☆☆

Purina Dog Chow earns the Advisor’s lowest rating of one star.

Currently, the Purina Dog Chow product line includes six kibbles. Although they all appear to be designed for adult dogs, we found no AAFCO nutritional adequacy statements for these foods on the Purina Dog Chow website.

Because Purina Puppy Chow is specially designed for younger pets, that product line is covered in a separate review.

The six adult kibbles are…

Purina Dog Chow Complete and Balanced was selected to represent the others in the line for this review.

Purina Dog Chow Complete and Balanced

Dry Dog Food

Estimated Dry Matter Nutrient Content

Protein = 24% | Fat = 11% | Carbs = 57%

Ingredients: whole grain corn, poultry by-product meal, animal fat preserved with mixed-tocopherols (form of vitamin E), corn gluten meal, meat and bone meal, brewers rice, soybean meal, barley, whole grain wheat, animal digest, calcium carbonate, salt, calcium phosphate, potassium chloride, l-lysine monohydrochloride, choline chloride, zinc sulfate, vitamin E supplement, zinc proteinate, ferrous sulfate, added color (red 40, yellow 5, blue 2, yellow 6), dl-methionine, manganese sulfate, manganese proteinate, niacin, vitamin a supplement, copper sulfate, calcium pantothenate, copper proteinate, garlic oil, pyridoxine hydrochloride, vitamin B-12 supplement, thiamine mononitrate, vitamin D-3 supplement, riboflavin supplement, calcium iodate, menadione sodium bisulfite complex (source of vitamin K activity), folic acid, biotin, sodium selenite

Fiber (estimated dry matter content) = 5.1%

Red items when present indicate controversial ingredients

The first ingredient in this dog food is corn. Now, contrary to what you may have heard, corn isn’t necessarily a bad ingredient.

On the other hand, although there’s no way to know for sure here, the corn used in making many pet foods can be similar to the kind used to make feed for livestock.

And that can sometimes be problematic.

What’s more, corn is commonly linked to canine food allergies1.

For these reasons, we rarely consider corn a preferred component in any dog food.

The second item lists poultry by-product meal… a dry rendered product of slaughterhouse waste. It’s made from what’s left of slaughtered poultry after all the prime cuts have been removed.

In a nutshell, poultry by-products are those unsavory and inedible leftovers deemed “unfit for human consumption”.

This stuff can contain almost anything… feet, beaks, undeveloped eggs… you name it.

What’s more, this item is somewhat generic. It doesn’t even specify the source animal.

On the brighter side, by-product meals are meat concentrates and contain nearly 300% more protein than fresh poultry.

The third item lists animal fat. Animal fat is a generic by-product of “rendering”… the same high-temperature process used to make meat meals.

Since there’s no mention of a specific animal, this stuff could come from just about anywhere… restaurant grease, diseased cattle, slaughterhouse waste… even euthanized pets.

We do not consider generic animal fat a quality ingredient.

The fourth item is corn gluten meal. Gluten is the rubbery residue remaining once corn has had most of its starchy carbohydrate (the good stuff) washed out of it.

Compared to meat, glutens are inferior grain-based proteins low in many of the essential amino acids dogs need to sustain life.

This inexpensive plant-based ingredient can significantly boost the total protein content reported in this dog food.

The fifth ingredient is meat and bone meal… a dry “rendered product from mammal tissues, including bone, exclusive of blood, hair, hoof, horn, hide trimmings, manure, stomach and rumen contents”.2

Meat and bone meal has a lower digestibility than most other meat meals.

Scientists believe this decreased protein quality may be due to the ingredient’s higher ash and lower essential amino acid content.3

What’s worse, this particular item is anonymous. It doesn’t even specify the source animal.

Even though meat and bone meals are still considered protein-rich meat concentrates, we do not consider a generic ingredient like this a quality item.

The sixth ingredient is brewers rice. Brewers rice represents the small grain fragments left over after milling whole rice.

This is an inexpensive cereal grain by-product and not considered a quality ingredient.

The seventh ingredient is soybean meal. Soybean meal is actually a useful by-product. It’s what remains of soybeans after all the oil has been removed.

Soybean meal contains 48% protein. However, compared to meat, this is an inferior plant-based protein. So, we must allow for this boosting effect as we judge the meat content of this food.

The eighth ingredient is barley. Barley is a starchy carbohydrate supplying fiber and other healthy nutrients. Unlike grains with a higher glycemic index (like rice), barley can help support stable blood sugar levels in dogs.

The ninth ingredient is wheat… a cereal grain with a nutrient profile similar to corn. And like other grains, wheat can be subject to the same problems and shortcomings.

Animal digest is a chemically hydrolyzed concoction of unspecified body parts… from unspecified animals. Animal digest is usually sprayed onto the surface of a dry kibble to improve its taste.

We’re always disappointed to find artificial coloring in any dog food.

Coloring is used to make the product more appealing to you… not your dog. After all, do you really think your dog cares what color his food is?

On the other hand…

We’re pleased to see this food lists chelated mineralsminerals that have been chemically attached to protein. This makes them easier to absorb. Chelated minerals are usually found in better dog foods.

From here, the list goes on to include a number of other items.

But to be realistic, ingredients located this far down the list (other than nutritional supplements) are not likely to have much of an effect on the overall rating of this product.

With three notable exceptions

First, we find no evidence of probiotics… friendly bacteria applied to the surface of the kibble after processing.

Next, garlic oil may be a controversial item. We say “may be” here because we are not certain of the oil’s chemical relationship to raw garlic itself.

In rare cases, garlic has been linked to Heinz body anemia in dogs.4

Most of the professional literature we surveyed did not provide any conclusive warnings regarding the use of garlic… especially in small amounts (as it is here).

Lastly, this Purina Dog Chow product also contains menadione… a controversial form of vitamin K linked to liver toxicity, allergies and the abnormal break-down of red blood cells.

Purina Dog Chow… the Bottom Line

Judging by its ingredients alone, Purina Dog Chow appears to be a below-average kibble.

But ingredient quality by itself cannot tell the whole story. We still need to estimate the product’s meat content before determining a final rating.

The dashboard displays a dry matter protein reading of 24%, a fat level of 11% and an estimated carbohydrate content of 57%.

As a group, the brand features an average protein content of 27% and an average fat level of 11%. Together, these figures suggest a carbohydrate portion size of 54% for the overall product line.

Below-average protein. Low fat. And above-average carbs… when compared to a typical dry dog food.

Yet when you consider the plant-based protein-boosting effect of the corn gluten meal, this looks like the profile of a kibble containing a limited amount of meat.

What’s worse, it’s difficult to ignore the presence of so many Red Flag items.

Bottom line?

Purina Dog Chow is primarily a grain-based kibble using only a modest amount of assorted by-product meals as its main source of animal protein… thus earning the brand one star.

Not recommended.

A Final Word

This review is designed to help you make a more informed decision when buying dog food. However, our rating system is not intended to suggest feeding a particular product will result in specific health benefits for your pet.

For a better understanding of how we analyzed this product, please be sure to read our article, “The Problem with Dog Food Reviews

Remember, no dog food can possibly be appropriate for every life stage, lifestyle or health condition. So, choose wisely. And when in doubt consult a veterinarian for help.

Have an opinion about this dog food… or maybe the review itself? Please know… we welcome your comments.

Notes and Updates

12/20/2009 Original review
07/29/2010 Review updated

  1. White, S., Update on food allergy in the dog and cat, World Small Animal Veterinary Association, Vancouver, 2001
  2. Association of American Feed Control Officials, 2008 Edition
  3. Shirley RB and Parsons CM, , Effect of Ash Content on Protein Quality of Meat and Bone Meal, Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Poultry Science, 2001 80: 626-632
  4. Yamato et al, Heinz Body hemolytic anemia with eccentrocytosis from ingestion of Chinese chive (Allium tuberosum) and garlic (Allium sativum) in a dog, Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association 41:68-73 (2005)
Dog Food Advisor IconThe Dog Food Advisor publishes independent reviews to help pet owners make better choices when shopping for dog food.


  • Marie

    Al Dente,

    I am glad to hear you’ve had luck with your dogs on Purina Dog Chow. While nutrition is a large part of canine and feline health, genetics play a large role in that as well.

    However, I feel more comfortable feeding a higher-quality food – that way I know that any vet visits are unlikely to be nutritionally related because I have pretty much eliminated that risk. You took a gamble, and you won with your past dogs. You are fortunate, and I hope you remain so.

  • Shawna

    Al Dante ~~ they have not been able to prove euthanized cats and dogs but euthanized animals has definitely been proven.  You can find the information on the FDA’s website but I’ll link to it for you :)

    “How pentobarbital can get into dog food
    Because in addition to producing anesthesia, pentobarbital is routinely used to euthanize animals, the most likely way it could get into dog food would be in rendered animal products.
    Rendered products come from a process that converts animal tissues to feed ingredients. Pentobarbital seems to be able to survive the rendering process. If animals are euthanized with pentobarbital and subsequently rendered, pentobarbital could be present in the rendered feed ingredients.
    In order to determine if pentobarbital residues were present in animal feeds, CVM developed a sophisticated process to detect and quantify minute levels – down to 2 parts per billion of pentobarbital in dry dog food. To confirm that the methods they developed worked properly, CVM scientists used the methods to analyze dry commercial dog foods purchased from retail outlets near to their Laurel, MD, laboratories. The scientists purchased dog food as part of two surveys, one in 1998 and the second in 2000. They found some samples contained pentobarbital (see the attached tables).”  http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/OfficeofFoods/CVM/CVMFOIAElectronicReadingRoom/ucm129131.htm

    This doesn’t specifically say road kill but diseased or dead animals may be just as bad.  “*CVM is aware of the sale of dead, dying, disabled, or diseased (4-D) animals to salvagers for use as animal food”  http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/ComplianceManuals/CompliancePolicyGuidanceManual/ucm074712.htm

    The original FDA article I have quoted from indicate the following four ingredients were found to be a source of pentobarbitol contamination (animal fat, animal digest, meat and bone meal and beef and bone meal).

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_UR4PVOARTWBDBNXUXENNPOBXTI Al Dente

    I find it funny how everyone is saying dont fall for Purinas claims bla bla bla yet you are all falling for the so called Premium companies claims.. I read some people saying they can put in eutanized dogs in the dogfood, or road kill. come on people.. There has never been any documented report of this happending. Maybe 50 yrs ago but nothing in recent history. It is scare tactics that you are fallling prey too.
    My dogs all lived very long and healtny lives on dog chow. They had shiny coats, healthy eyes and never had any health problems. They all lived to at least their average life span and some even longer. They money I saved on dog food helped pay for spaying, neutering, a few emergency vet visits (not nutrition related). My vets always commented on how healthy and good my dogs looked and all fed dog chow. If you guys want to buy the hype of your premium brands go ahead, I will buy into the Purinas hype that their food is fine. The only things I do is supplement at times with some inexpensive olive oil which I used myself for all its health benefits. People are led to feel guilty if they do not buy this or that brand or if they use dog chow.. not me. 

  • Dave M

    In my opinion this food is “poison” but years ago I use to feed my dogs Iams Lamb and Rice (marginally better) and they both lived 16 – 17 years )pretty good for coonhounds). However they always got some meat from dinner etc. Now I am educated and I feed my dogs the best foods (in my opinion) short of home cooking or raw (one of my dogs will not eat raw). The marketing campaigns of these horrible foods are still effective….

  • Michelle

    Sheila, you really should read the review at the top of this page. It explains exactly what is wrong with this food. It consists of grain, low quality by products, nondescript “animal” fat, this could be anything, to include euthanized pets. “Animal” digest. Four different dyes. And Menadione,. So, what’s so great about it? Nothing, that I can find…….

  • Sheila

    Well…I guess I don’t feel that Purina is such a horrible food as all that! I used to feed Purina Dog Chow or Purina Pro Plan when I had big dogs ( labs and the occasional “walk-in” mix-breed), and for those 30 some years my dogs were very healthy, not prone to needing extra vet work, no allergies, no cancers and most lived into thier mid to late teens…which is ripe old age for large breeds in general…and yes Jonathan, I do choose to euthanize when it becomes clear that quality of life is gone due to advanced age. For the record…very very few dogs “die of old age in thier sleep.”
    I didn’t have much money at the time, and my dogs were certainly not suffering from eating Purina products. I’m afraid that I don’t consider it to be “Toxic Waste” and from reading what Jonathan has to say, I have to wonder if he is a rep for Pro Pac?
    I now have mostly Pugs and I feed Diamond Naturals Chicken and Rice so that I am not feeding a lot of grains, particularily corn. Pugs tend to be a bit gassy if they eat a lot of grain…enough said! I really like Diamond Naturals quite a bit and recommend it ( not regular Diamond though, which is corn based, and gives all of my dogs bad gas, diarrhea and the scoots); it’s nearly equal in cost to Purina regular chows, it’s less $$ than Pro Plan and ONE, and since it has Beet Pulp, I also find that I have less probelms with Anal Glands becoming backed-up…a real plus (-:
    I don’t think Purina is a terrible choice for the average dog when the owner is on a budget, but there are alternatives ( Diamond and also 4Care, which are about on equal footing IMHO and also in star rating) that really won’t cost you a ton more to feed.
    BTW…that comment about breeders being people who throw out dogs that don’t meet thier standards…What!? I take serious offense to that sort of talk, as a breeder, a vet tech and a life long lover of dogs. Like many breeders I am involved in breed rescue, I am a “no shelter” breeder meaning that none of my dogs need ever end up at the pound/craiglist/humane society, since I will take any one of them back at any time and for any reason. Good breeders are good people, bad breeders are not really “breeders” at all, they are puppy millers or back yard breeders, and there is a significant difference between the good and the bad!

  • Candice

    I fed my one year old shepherd mix this food for a couple months and she was constantly vomiting. I never thought it could be the food; I thought she had a problem or she ate something bad while she was outside. However, I just switched her a couple weeks ago to Iams Simple & Natural (not to be confused with any of the other Iams blends – see http://www.dogfoodadvisor.com/dog-food-reviews/iams-simple-natural/) and she not only eats all of her food, but pretty much every health issue she had is gone. She no longer throws up, her coat is shinier, and she is overall just a much healthier and happier dog. PLUS, I chose that brand because it’s rated 4 stars AND is fairly priced, not like all the ridiculous priced higher end foods. Yet it’s still in the four star category. I would suggest you feed your dog anything other than Dog Chow. I have also heard fantastic things about Kirkland’s (Costco brand) and it’s also a 4 star at a great price.

  • Melissa

    the only reason i am reading these comment is because we got another dog and decided to save money by switching to a cheaper dog food.. the first week i mix the food so that way the dogs were adjusting to the new food and they did fine. the second week is here and it they are eatting this dog food straight and both dogs are eatting it and throwing it up an hour later. I guess i am looking to find out if anyone else is having these experience with their dogs eatting the dog food?

  • Tasha Brumley

    I like your thoughts, Linnea Vick.

  • Linnea Vick

    Here’s the thing. I work at a Petstore (And no, not PetSmart of PetCo). We carry nothing Purina just because of the poor quality and the Company Tricks. Don’t listen to the “Complete and Balanced”, or “U.S. Vet’s #1 Choice”. It’s complete bologna. A diet can be complete, but not balanced. But who’s to say that the diet will be completed with wholesome and quality ingredients? Nothing but sheer marketing schemes. Pay attention to the pet food labels. Look at Purina products or even Iams and Eukanuba. You’ll see the sources of protein (which is vital) is horrific. I’d like to emphasyze BY-PRODUCT directly after the meat name. It’s like feeding our kids McDonald’s. They love the taste, it’s “natural” ingredients, and it’s a big market. But look at the nutrition facts and the fact that they get hungry again an hour or two later. Would you feed your child McDonald’s every day of its life?

  • melissa

    Spencer-

    Many things can be prevented by feeding a certain way, typically only if those things would have been caused by feeding otherwise. Raw is not a cureall, or a begin all, end all either. Its not the majic bullet some would like everyone to believe.

    Genetics plays a HUGE part of many things including disease expression, longevity, size, and even temperament. The genes for diseases are funny beasts and can be dominant, recessive etc. Unfortuently, its human nature to look at the things we can control and try to change them rather than understand things are often out of our control.

    Talk with your vet about Fatty Lipomas.

  • Michelle

    Spencer, Lipomas are a genetic malady. Usually a breed specific condition.More apt to happen in certain breeds than others.Like Labradors,Golden Retrievers,and such.You are feeding your dog well,so don’t blame it on that.Talk to your vet and do some research on the subject.

  • Meagan

    Spencer-That really bothers me to read that. Lots of people talk up raw food and then that happens. NOTHING IS SAFE! Sorry about your dog. :(

  • Mike P

    Hmm , maybe a chink in the raw food armour ?? My last dog got fat sacks but I also fed alot of table crap ..not anymore though with my new dog

  • http://Cohentcsn@cox.net Spencer

    My dog eats nothing but raw, both homemade and commercial and developed “fat sacks”, needless to say, am not happy about it, neighbors all feed purina or pedigree crap and they’re dogs have no lipomas, although they do itch occasionally. I don’t know what to think anymore, but won’t start feeding corn-based f oods.

  • Jonathan

    A point taken, Doc. I apologize from any offense.

  • http://DogFoodAdvisor.com Mike Sagman

    Jonathan… Although your usual advice to our many visitors can be exceptionally helpful, your recent comment to Antonio suggesting breeders “throw out dogs that are not up to their standards” or that they are “people who do not truly care about the animal” is unfair and inappropriate.

    I have had the personal pleasure of knowing many breeders in my life (including Claudia, my nurse for over 25 years). And I can assure you, nearly all have been kind, loving and knowledgeable professionals.

    I know of no group within my own circle of friends that has spent more time rescuing and placing homeless dogs… including our own “mix”, Bailey and my son’s boxer… Abby, than these dog experts.

    Bailey and Abby were each homeless when they were first introduced to our two families by caring breeders. And for that, we are most thankful.

    Although there will always be “bad apples” in every profession (including medicine), it’s unfair to condemn an entire group for the misguided actions of the minority.

  • Antonio

    Mike P,

    Why would I be jealous about Jonathan’s information when I have access to the same information online? That would be a bit childish don’t you think? I simply like to measure all angles of a conversation and give readers the opportunity to hear both sides of the situation instead of just riding the band wagon and leaving topics one sided. But just a little back ground, I did take 2 years of nutritional study while obtaining my B.S. back in college, but I didn’t major in that area, it was purely done as elective course study work. And Melissa I agree with a lot you posted above, many breeders and people in the working dog community simply wants a feed that works, generally cost is not the big factor as long as brand “x” works as advertised.

  • Melissa

    Jonathan-

    Unless you are a breeder and involved in the show circuit, you have no information to make such comments regarding breeders.It would appear that in your limited exposure, you are coming in contact with mills/bybs and “disreputable” ones. Making such a blanket statement about breeders is, imo no more valid than if I started spouting off that its in “petsupply stores” best interest to push more expensive brands of foods for bigger revenue.

    True reputable breeders do not “throw away” their dogs or the offspring produced-and most ACTIVELY rescue in our “given” breed of choice.

    Unfortunetly, there are often “bonuses” for a breeder to feed one food over another, and therefore, they do. However, there is no reputable or show breeder that is going to feed a food that the dog does not do well on in the “here and now” And, as a person heavily involved in all aspects of the canine world, there is no denying that the vast majority of dogs do appear to do well on foods such as Proplan, Iams and Eukanuba at least in the “here and now”sense which is what most owners limit their field of vision to.

    While the majority of people here understand that the concepts of dogfood and nutrition have changed over the years, there is no discounting the fact that before it did, and before so many brands came upon the market, dogs either ate foods such as Dog Chow or table scraps and lived very long healthy lives. When someone says “my dog ate Proplan(or pick a brand!) and lived to be x yrs old” certain people want to jump in and say “But could he/she have lived to be x if NOT fed that food”. While in some people’s minds there may appear to be a “direct” cause and effect, we also know better regarding that. There are many many factors beyond food and genetics that are different today then yesterday-vaccinations, environmental pollution etc are just two. Such a question can be used to further any agenda the writer has-whether getting someone to feed a certain quality of dog food to pushing for a household that only cleans things with vinegar.

    Melissa

  • http://DogFoodAdvisor.com Mike Sagman

    Hi Mike P… As Antonio so astutely observed yesterday, ours is a website devoted to dogs. And because we love our dogs as much as we do, it’s easy to get caught up in the emotional questions and personal opinions we all have about these wonderful creatures.

    What’s more, as we’ve seen here recently, these debates can be about controversial subjects. For example, are dogs carnivores… or omnivores? Is corn good for a dog… or bad? Are grain free dog foods a dietary improvement… or are they just another profit-driven contrivance of the pet food industry designed to help us part with more of our hard-earned money?

    And sometimes we even get a little carried away by expressing our personal feelings regarding critical issues about dogs… yet have little to do with the topic of food.

    As I myself learned yesterday (when I inappropriately criticized one of our top contributors), it’s easy to forget that blogs (like ours) are here for the purpose of debating these important issues. And when debating them, each of us must be prepared to find some rather notable (and emotional) differences.

    Debate can be healthy. It can help answer questions and resolve problems. And our comments can contribute to our collective understanding of an important topic… unless those comments become cruel and degenerate into name-calling, character assassination and hurtful narrative.

    And so far (even though they sometimes ineptly wander away from the subject of food), the debate you see here between Antonio and Jonathan has for the most part been healthy.

  • Mike P

    Antonio, I hear stories of old men that smoke and drank booze every day and lived to 90 . I suppose there are dogs that can live long on junk dog food . Must be a gene thing . I think most of us just want to give our body and our dogs body a chance with eating and living right . As for Jonathan , he is very helpful and informative. Sometimes in your post you seem a little jealous of him . This place is really turning confratational ..

  • Jonathan

    Antonio, these are also people that “throw out” dogs that are not up to their “standards”. I don’t find many breeders to be people that truly care about the animal… they more like how the animal makes them feel. If these breeders loved dogs so much, why aren’t they rescuing dogs that are being euthanized (and potentially turned into the fat that’s in their Purina products) instead of adding more dogs to the problem? These people want a food that they can keep their dogs “on” as if it were some nameless pharmaceutical. I sure wouldn’t want to eat the same “nutrient pellet” day in and day out.

    And, no, I am not “trained” in pet nutrition. I work in a pet supply store and research pet nutrition on my own time.