Sign in or Register
Search Forums
Recent Topics
-
can’t view Next level food Review
by mamba24
2 days, 19 hours ago
-
How does temporary email work?
by Gareth W
3 days, 14 hours ago
-
Cenforce 150 | To Treat Erectile Dysfunction
by justin williams
4 days, 4 hours ago
-
Food Recommendations
by Prism E
2 weeks, 5 days ago
-
What are the advantages of online family counseling services for families?
by whispered W
2 weeks, 5 days ago
Recent Replies
- Lia S on Looking for Advice (Topic 3)
- akhi14 on Probiotics and canine colitis
- hemac on Stella and chewys wild red raw kibble or open farm raw mix?
- Mishaal Khalid on essay writing
- Frederik on Something’s Wrong at Wellness or Amazon
- dfaadminuser on Wanted food review
- Heather Kingsley on Feeding Behavior w/ 2+ Pets
- Mark W on What are the advantages of online family counseling services for families?
- Foster W on Exams4sure’s Sharing and Visibility Architect Exam
- Feyd R on Chefpaw Opinions?
- Anna K on Can I find a dog who love video game?
- pet B on Lab with Food Allergies – Any Help is Appreciated!
- Carly H on Small Bits of Blood(?) In Dog’s Poop
- Carly H on Dream-bone treats anyone?
- Gareth W on ultimate solution
- This topic has 1 reply, 1 voice, and was last updated 5 years, 1 month ago by anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
anonymousMember
https://www.veterinarypracticenews.com/banning-artificial-ingredients-based-fear-science/print/ excerpt below, click on link for full article
“The best way to protect pets’ health is to rely on sound scientific evidence to help us weigh the risks and benefits of the food and medicine we provide, not to cater to fears like chemophobia and meaningless distinctions such as “natural” and “artificial.” Table 1[2] provides a partial list of the sources, regulatory approvals, and evidence for safety and potentially beneficial effects of the items on the Petco blacklist. This is not a comprehensive review, simply an illustration that the items on this list are often “natural,” are judged by government experts around the world to be safe as used in food for humans and animals, and may have beneficial uses offsetting any risk they may present.
Veterinarians have a responsibility to support and educate pet owners and to challenge unscientific, fear-based marketing ploys. The movement toward dangerous “natural” practices like feeding raw diets and avoiding vaccination is a real threat to animal welfare, and it is exacerbated by companies, regardless of industry, seeking market advantage through capitalizing on misconceptions and fear.” -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Sign in or Register
Search Forums
Recent Topics
-
can’t view Next level food Review
by mamba24
2 days, 19 hours ago
-
How does temporary email work?
by Gareth W
3 days, 14 hours ago
-
Cenforce 150 | To Treat Erectile Dysfunction
by justin williams
4 days, 4 hours ago
-
Food Recommendations
by Prism E
2 weeks, 5 days ago
-
What are the advantages of online family counseling services for families?
by whispered W
2 weeks, 5 days ago
Recent Replies
- Lia S on Looking for Advice (Topic 3)
- akhi14 on Probiotics and canine colitis
- hemac on Stella and chewys wild red raw kibble or open farm raw mix?
- Mishaal Khalid on essay writing
- Frederik on Something’s Wrong at Wellness or Amazon
- dfaadminuser on Wanted food review
- Heather Kingsley on Feeding Behavior w/ 2+ Pets
- Mark W on What are the advantages of online family counseling services for families?
- Foster W on Exams4sure’s Sharing and Visibility Architect Exam
- Feyd R on Chefpaw Opinions?
- Anna K on Can I find a dog who love video game?
- pet B on Lab with Food Allergies – Any Help is Appreciated!
- Carly H on Small Bits of Blood(?) In Dog’s Poop
- Carly H on Dream-bone treats anyone?
- Gareth W on ultimate solution