If that was true would the ADE reports on the liver failure deaths be assessed as probable and possible cause and would their letters to owner of one dead dog describe it as an idiosyncratic responce to the ingredient? The necropsy finding even pointed to two previous assaults on the liver could tie in with the dogs first two doses where she had just been sick for a day or two. It was dose three that caused almost immediate serious reaction and death only days later which has happened many times.
