Hill’s Science Diet Puppy (Dry)

Share

Rating: ★★☆☆☆

Hill’s Science Diet Puppy dry dog food earns the Advisor’s second-lowest rating of two stars.

Currently, the Hill’s Science Diet Puppy product line lists five dry dog foods.

Although each formulation appears to be designed for puppies, we found no AAFCO nutritional adequacy statements for these dog foods on the Hill’s Science Diet website.

  • Hill’s Science Diet Puppy Lamb Meal and Rice Large Breed
  • Hill’s Science Diet Puppy Healthy Development Original
  • Hill’s Science Diet Puppy Lamb Meal and Rice
  • Hill’s Science Diet Puppy Large Breed
  • Hill’s Science Diet Puppy Small Bites

Hill’s Science Diet Puppy Small Bites dry dog food was selected to represent the others in the line for this review.

Hill's Science Diet Puppy Small Bites

Dry Dog Food

Estimated Dry Matter Nutrient Content

Protein = 32% | Fat = 23% | Carbs = 37%

Ingredients: Ground whole grain corn, chicken by-product meal, animal fat (preserved with mixed tocopherols and citric acid), liver flavor, flaxseed, soybean oil, powdered cellulose, dried beet pulp, fish oil, corn gluten meal, dicalcium phosphate, dried egg product, iodized salt, dl-methionine, potassium chloride, choline chloride, natural flavor, vitamins (l-ascorbyl-2-polyphosphate (source of vitamin C), vitamin E supplement, niacin, thiamine mononitrate, vitamin A supplement, calcium pantothenate, biotin, vitamin B12 supplement, pyridoxine hydrochloride, riboflavin, folic acid, vitamin D3 supplement), vitamin E supplement, minerals (manganese sulfate, ferrous sulfate, zinc oxide, copper sulfate, calcium iodate, sodium selenite), l-tryptophan, preserved with mixed tocopherols and citric acid, l-carnitine, phosphoric acid, beta-carotene, rosemary extract

Fiber (estimated dry matter content) = 3.6%

Red items when present indicate controversial ingredients

The first ingredient in this dog food is corn. Now, contrary to what you may have heard, corn isn’t necessarily a bad ingredient.

On the other hand, although there’s no way to know for sure here, the corn used in making many pet foods can be similar to the kind used to make feed for livestock.

And that can sometimes be problematic.

What’s more, corn is commonly linked to canine food allergies1.

For these reasons, we rarely consider corn a preferred component in any dog food.

The second item lists chicken by-product meal… a dry rendered product of slaughterhouse waste. It’s made from what’s left of a slaughtered chicken after all the prime cuts have been removed.

In a nutshell, chicken by-products are those unsavory leftovers usually considered “unfit for human consumption”.

This stuff can contain almost anything… feet, beaks, undeveloped eggs… you name it.

On the brighter side, by-product meals are meat concentrates and contain nearly 300% more protein than fresh chicken.

The third item lists animal fat. Animal fat is a generic by-product of rendering… the same high-temperature process used to make meat meals.

Since there’s no mention of a specific animal, this item could come from almost anywhere… restaurant grease, slaughterhouse waste, diseased cattle… even euthanized pets.

We do not consider generic animal fat a quality ingredient.

After liver flavor, we find flaxseed… one of the best plant sources of healthy omega-3 fatty acids. Flax seeds are rich in soluble fiber.

However, we find it unusual to see flaxseed here in its whole seed form. Whole flax seeds are almost impossible to digest (at least for us humans) unless they are first ground to a usable powder before they are consumed.

The sixth ingredient is soybean oil… red flagged here only due to its suspected (yet unlikely) link to canine food allergies.

The seventh ingredient is powdered cellulose… a non-digestible plant fiber usually made from cotton or sawdust.

Cellulose is sometimes added to dilute the number of calories per serving and to give the feeling of fullness when it is eaten.

Except for the usual benefits of fiber, powdered cellulose provides no nutritional value to a dog.

The eighth item lists dried beet pulp. Beet pulp is a controversial ingredient… a high fiber by-product of sugar beet processing.

Some denounce beet pulp as an inexpensive filler while others cite its outstanding intestinal health and blood sugar benefits.

We only call your attention here to the controversy and believe the inclusion of beet pulp in reasonable amounts in most dog foods is entirely acceptable.

The ninth ingredient is fish oil. Fish oil is naturally rich in omega-3 fatty acids… and (depending on the level of its purity) should be considered a healthy addition.

The tenth item is corn gluten meal. Gluten is the rubbery residue remaining once corn has had most of its starchy carbohydrate (the good stuff) washed out of it.

Compared to meat, glutens are inferior grain-based proteins low in many of the essential amino acids dogs need to sustain life.

This inexpensive plant-based ingredient can significantly boost the total protein content reported in this dog food.

From here, the list goes on to include a number of other items.

But to be realistic, ingredients located this far down the list (other than nutritional supplements) are not likely to have much of an effect on the overall rating of this product.

With two notable exceptions

First, we find no evidence of probiotics… friendly bacteria applied to the surface of the kibble after processing.

Finally, the minerals here do not appear to be chelated. And that can make them more difficult to absorb. Non-chelated minerals are usually associated with lower quality dog foods.

Hill’s Science Diet Puppy Dry Dog Food
The Bottom Line

Judging by its ingredients alone, Hill’s Science Diet Puppy appears to be a below-average dry dog food.

But ingredient quality by itself cannot tell the whole story. We still need to estimate the product’s meat content before determining a final rating.

The dashboard displays a dry matter protein reading of 32%, a fat level of 23% and an estimated carbohydrate content of 37%.

As a group, the puppy line features an average protein content of 32% and an average fat level of 20%. Jointly, these figures suggest a carbohydrate serving size of 40% for the overall product line.

Above-average protein. Above-average fat. And low carbs… when compared to a typical dry dog food.

Yet when you allow for the protein-boosting effect of the corn gluten meal, this looks like the profile of a kibble containing only a moderate amount of meat.

What’s more, it’s difficult to ignore the presence of so many Red Flag ingredients.

Bottom line?

Hill’s Science Diet Puppy is a grain-based dry dog food using a moderate amount of chicken by-product or lamb meals as its main sources of animal protein… thus earning the brand two stars.

Not recommended.

Those looking for a wet food from the same company may wish to visit our review of Hill’s Science Diet Puppy canned dog food.

A Final Word

This review is designed to help you make a more informed decision when buying dog food. However, our rating system is not intended to suggest feeding a particular product will result in specific health benefits for your pet.

For a better understanding of how we analyzed this product, please be sure to read our article, “The Problem with Dog Food Reviews

Remember, no dog food can possibly be appropriate for every life stage, lifestyle or health condition. So, choose wisely. And when in doubt consult a veterinarian for help.

Have an opinion about this dog food… or maybe the review itself? Please know… we welcome your comments.

Notes and Updates

12/30/2009 Original review
08/03/2010 Review updated

  1. White, S., Update on food allergy in the dog and cat, World Small Animal Veterinary Association, Vancouver, 2001
Dog Food Advisor IconThe Dog Food Advisor publishes independent reviews to help pet owners make better choices when shopping for dog food.


  • Dave M

    Nor the person to buy dogs from.

  • Lucy

    Anita is clearly… not the person to take advice from.

    1. Unintentional breeding of dogs.
    2. Bragging about the size of unhealthy tea cup dogs.
    3. Using a site to sell undersized, unhealthy dogs.
    4. Dismayed by clear, unbiased research.

  • gerald

    This brand sucks. I reccomend Blue Buffalo or Taste of the Wild.

  • http://NickieG@aol.com Anita

    I have two darling Yorkies. Lacy just had 3 unexpected babies.
    I have feed my Yorkies Hills Science Diet because in Colorado the Breeder recommended Hills. I moved to Pa. and the Vet suggested Hills Science Diet. My Tiny Yorkies are 5 years old and have never been sick. I attribute that to Hills Science Diet.
    Thank You,
    Anita
    If its isn’t broken don’t fix it… I never give any table food.
    Any one want to buy Chloie, Oliver or Dasey please e-mail me at [poster's email removed by editor] Lacy the Mother is 3.5 lbs and father is 4.5lbs

  • Gordon

    ….And we can’t have that happening now can we?

  • Gordon

    Laura – They would even be out of complete business, if more listened to wise and educated people like Dr. Tom Lonsdale. Of who, advocate that manufactured pet foods, are nothing at all, but to only make money and nothing else.

    The very fact that truly fresh whole raw animal carcasses, raw meaty bones, and offal, with the minor occasional seasonal fruits and veggies added, plus human table scraps, is all our 4 legged pets ever truly need for the best health, vitality and life longevity!

    But pet food manufacturers don’t want you or anyone to believe this reality. Otherwise, they would truly be out of business.

  • http://www.HomestretchHounds.org Laura

    I absolutely agree with you Shawna…the sad part for me, the big manufacturers that claim to be doing so much, are in reality doing very little to help rescues and shelters…especially considering the marketing that they demand in return. Most of those same manufacturers offer much better programs and deals for breeders then for rescues, but the reality is, they are still using the programs to market overpriced junk food to unsuspecting pet parents. Their marketing slogans drive me crazy, claiming to care so much about pets…if they truly cared, they would manufacture at least decent quality foods for pets instead of crap. Well, enough of that soap box…but I am so thrilled to see this site and it is refreshing to see posts from caring and educated pet parents! Tail wags!

  • Shawna

    It’s been a LONG day… Sorry for all the errors in my posts!!

  • Shawna

    Laura,

    You are welcome! And, thank YOU for the information on you HS and SD.. My local HS also sells SD. I know Purina sponsors rescues too.. I foster for a local Boston Terrier group and Purina provides bags of dog food each year to the rescue. The rescue then hands out coupons and marketing material for Purina with each adoption…

    I know that rescues can use the support — we would lose some of our foster parents if they had to purchase the food they feed (even though it can be written off for those that do write offs) but I wish Purina and others would sink some of that monies into better quality ingredients… Celebrity spokes persons and tv advertising isn’t cheap I’m sure…

  • http://www.HomestretchHounds.org Laura

    PS Shawna, thank you for the links and for all of the information!

  • http://www.HomestretchHounds.org Laura

    Hi Mike! I just wanted to thank you for this incredibly informative web site! I found your site shortly after we lost a dear dog-kid to kidney failure at only 4 years old. The first question we were asked over and over, did he consume any of the recalled pet foods from a few years back. Sadly, I could never really answer that question because I wasn’t sure. It amazes and saddens me to see some of the ridiculously overpriced “premium” foods on the market. It is sad because for less money, you can provide better food for your beloved pets if you just know how to read the labels. I have learned so much on your site, thank you, thank you, thank you!
    We have a rescue and were on the Hills Science Diet shelter feeding program for a few years. Science Diet provides discounted food (a corn based food below even what they sell in the stores) and in return, we of course had to promote their, in my opinion, over priced $50 per bag junk food. Boy, am I ever happy to be off of that program…sometimes I felt we sold our souls to the devil in order to meet their program requirements. If I had to guess, I would say it is something similar with how so many of the vets promote Science Diet foods.

  • Shawna

    RD,

    The unfortunate answer to that question, imo, is because they can. These and other, just as bad, ingredients are legal – through loopholes.

    They can also add “4D” ingredients to dog/cat foods. — also from the FDA’s website — “*CVM is aware of the sale of dead, dying, disabled, or diseased (4-D) animals to salvagers for use as animal food. Meat from these carcasses is boned and the meat is packaged or frozen without heat processing. The raw, frozen meat is shipped for use by several industries, including pet food manufacturers, zoos, greyhound kennels, and mink ranches.” http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/ComplianceManuals/CompliancePolicyGuidanceManual/ucm074712.htm

    “Diseased” — like maybe cancerous tissue..?? The problem with 4D ingredients is that it is much harder to detect the ingredients and manufacturers that use them..

    If it is known that diseased and euthanized animals are allowed in dog food can you imagine what else is allowed — moldy grains, sprouted (and therefore toxic) potatos etc…

    Many (if not most) of us that use the higher end (and consequently higher priced) foods do so in an attempt to avoid these types of ingredients.

    If you start investingating, you will find that the human food processing industry is not as clean as we would hope either. Example — a story broke several years ago that a company was selling meats from “downed” cattle (which is illegal) to a school district in California.. http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2009/May/09-civ-426.html

    If there is a buck to be made you can be assured that there are unethical (albeit sometimes perfectly legal) people out there that will attempt to make it..

  • RD

    Shawna i read ur links u posted now i understand but why is the store keep selling this harmful product

  • Michelle

    Hi RD, Did you read the review at the top of this page? A dog food can not magically be better than it’s ingredient list. ;)

  • Shawna

    RD,

    I had to chuckle at your post.. I appreciate your passion :) . However, I really think it has more to do with understanding ingredients then being a good or bad dog parent. For example — SD Puppy Food has the ingredient “animal fat” in it. Sounds innocuous enough however the FDA says this ingredient is known to be one of four ingredients that can be contaminated with pentobarbitol (the drug they use to euthanize animals). Here’s the link if you want to view for yourself http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CVM/CVMFOIAElectronicReadingRoom/ucm129134.htm

    Some would say that the drug is no longer active in dog food or that there isn’t enough to be a problem. However the US Fish and Wildlife service disagrees. They state “Rendering is not an acceptable way to dispose of a pentobarbital-tainted carcass. The drug residues are not destroyed in the rendering process, so the tissues and by-products may contain poison and must not be used for animal feed….

    All pentobarbital-euthanized carcasses should be prominently tagged with one or more highly-visible “POISON” warning labels. Bagged animals should have a label affixed to the carcass itself and also attached to the outside of the bag.” http://cpharm.vetmed.vt.edu/USFWS/USFWSFPentobarbFactSheet.pdf

    Some people may not be bothered by this ingredient but many are and would not consider the food due to just this one ingredient. Let alone issues with other ingredients in Science Diet foods.