Bil Jac Dog Food (Dry)

Share

Rating: ★★½☆☆

Bil Jac Dog Food receives the Advisor’s below-average rating of 2.5 stars.

The Bil Jac product line includes 9 dry dog foods. However, since we’re unable to locate AAFCO nutritional adequacy statements for these dog foods on the Bil Jac website, it’s impossible for us to report specific life stage recommendations for these recipes.

The following is a list of recipes available at the time of this review.

  • Bil Jac Adult Select
  • Bil Jac Puppy Select
  • Bil Jac Senior Select
  • Bil Jac Small Breed Adult
  • Bil Jac Large Breed Adult
  • Bil Jac Sensitive Solutions
  • Bil Jac Large Breed Puppy
  • Bil Jac Small Breed Puppy
  • Bil Jac Reduced Fat (1.5 stars)

Bil Jac Adult Select was selected to represent the other products in the line for this review.

Bil Jac Adult Select

Dry Dog Food

Estimated Dry Matter Nutrient Content

Protein = 30% | Fat = 20% | Carbs = 42%

Ingredients: Chicken, chicken by-products (organs only, source of arginine), corn meal, chicken by-product meal, oatmeal, dried beet pulp, brewers dried yeast, flaxseed, dl-methionine, l-lysine, sodium propionate and mixed tocopherols (preservatives), salt, vitamin A acetate, vitamin D3 supplement, vitamin E supplement, riboflavin supplement, niacin, biotin, choline chloride, folic acid, thiamine mononitrate, pyridoxine hydrochloride (vitamin B6), ascorbic acid, vitamin B12 supplement, d-calcium pantothenate, manganous oxide, inositol, BHA (a preservative), ferrous sulfate, copper sulfate, zinc oxide, cobalt carbonate, potassium iodide, sodium selenite, rosemary extract

Fiber (estimated dry matter content) = 4.4%

Red items when present indicate controversial ingredients

Estimated Nutrient Content
MethodProteinFatCarbs
Guaranteed Analysis27%18%NA
Dry Matter Basis30%20%42%
Calorie Weighted Basis25%40%35%

The first ingredient in this dog food is chicken. Although it is a quality item, raw chicken contains about 80% water. After cooking, most of that moisture is lost, reducing the meat content to just a fraction of its original weight.

After processing, this item would probably account for a smaller part of the total content of the finished product.

The second ingredient is chicken by-products, what’s left of a slaughtered chicken after all the good cuts have been removed.

In most cases, chicken by-products are the unsavory leftovers of processing frequently deemed “unfit for human consumption”.

However, here the manufacturer specifies “organ meat only” which makes this item something more desirable, and better described as chicken giblets.

Once again, this item is inclusive of water and is subject to the same drying effects of cooking previously described.

The third ingredient is cornmeal, a coarsely ground flour made from dried corn. Corn is an inexpensive and controversial cereal grain of only modest nutritional value to a dog.

For this reason, we do not consider corn a preferred component in any dog food.

The fourth ingredient ischicken by-product meal, a dry rendered product of slaughterhouse waste. It’s made from what’s left of a slaughtered chicken after all the prime cuts have been removed.

In a nutshell, chicken by-products are those unsavory leftovers usually considered “unfit for human consumption”.

In addition to organs (the nourishing part), this stuff can contain almost anything — feet, beaks, undeveloped eggs — anything except quality skeletal muscle (real meat).

On the brighter side, by-product meals are meat concentrates and contain nearly 300% more protein than fresh chicken.

In any case, although this item contains all the amino acids a dog needs, we consider chicken by-products a less expensive, lower quality ingredient.

The fifth ingredient is oatmeal, a whole-grain product made from coarsely ground oats. Oatmeal is naturally rich in B-vitamins, dietary fiber and is also (unlike many other grains) gluten-free.

The sixth ingredient is beet pulp. Beet pulp is a controversial ingredient, a high fiber by-product of sugar beet processing.

Some denounce beet pulp as an inexpensive filler while others cite its outstanding intestinal health and blood sugar benefits.

We only call your attention here to the controversy and believe the inclusion of beet pulp in reasonable amounts in most dog foods is entirely acceptable.

The seventh ingredient is brewers dried yeast. Brewers yeast can be a controversial item. Although it’s a by-product of the beer making process, this ingredient contains about 45% protein and is rich in other healthy nutrients.

Fans believe yeast repels fleas and supports the immune system.

Critics argue yeast ingredients can be linked to allergies. This may be true, but (like all allergies) only if your particular dog is allergic to the yeast itself.

What’s more, a vocal minority insists yeast can increase the risk of developing the life-threatening condition known as bloat. However, this is something we’ve not been able to scientifically verify.

In any case, unless your dog is specifically allergic to it, yeast can still be considered a nutritious additive.

The eighth ingredient is flaxseed, one of the best plant sources of healthy omega-3 fatty acids. Provided they’ve first been ground into a meal, flax seeds are also rich in soluble fiber.

From here, the list goes on to include a number of other items.

But to be realistic, ingredients located this far down the list (other than nutritional supplements) are not likely to affect the overall rating of this product.

With three notable exceptions

First, we find no mention of probiotics, friendly bacteria applied to the surface of the kibble after processing.

Next, the minerals listed here do not appear to be chelated. And that can make them more difficult to absorb. Non-chelated minerals are usually associated with lower quality dog foods.

And lastly, this food is preserved with BHA, a suspected cancer-causing agent.

Bil Jac Dog Food
The Bottom Line

Judging by its ingredients alone, Bil Jac looks to be a below-average dry dog food.

But ingredient quality by itself cannot tell the whole story. We still need to estimate the product’s meat content before determining a final rating.

The dashboard displays a dry matter protein reading of 30%, a fat level of 20% and estimated carbohydrates of about 42%.

As a group, if we omit the lower-rated Reduced Fat product, the brand features an average protein content of 28% and a mean fat level of 18%. Together, these figures suggest a carbohydrate content of 46% for the overall product line.

And a fat-to-protein ratio of about 64%.

Near-average protein. Above-average fat. And below-average carbs when compared to a typical dry dog food.

Free of any plant-based protein boosters, this looks like the profile of a kibble containing a moderate amount of meat.

Bottom line?

Bil Jac is a plant-based kibble using a moderate amount of chicken and chicken by-product meal as its main sources of animal protein, thus earning the brand 2.5 stars.

Not recommended.

A Final Word

This review is designed to help you make a more informed decision when buying dog food. However, our rating system is not intended to suggest feeding a particular product will result in specific health benefits for your pet.

For a better understanding of how we analyzed this product, please be sure to read our article, “The Problem with Dog Food Reviews

Remember, no dog food can possibly be appropriate for every life stage, lifestyle or health condition. So, choose wisely. And when in doubt consult a veterinarian for help.

Have an opinion about this dog food? Or maybe the review itself? Please know we welcome your comments.

Other spellings: Biljac, Bil-Jac

Notes and Updates

02/21/2010 Original review
07/10/2010 Review updated
09/24/2010 Review updated
12/17/2010 Review updated (menadione and eggs removed)
11/20/2011 Review updated (added Sensitive Solutions product)
04/11/2012 Last Update

Dog Food Advisor IconThe Dog Food Advisor publishes independent reviews to help pet owners make better choices when shopping for dog food.


  • sandy

    Laurie,

    Maybe they would like Back to Basics. It is also made with organ meats.

    http://www.backtobasicspetfood.com/dog-food-analysis-ingredients

  • Laurie M

    My little dogs are so terribly picky. they refuse to eat any other kind of dry food. they will only eat Biljac. what is it about bil Jac that is so appealing to them? Mayby because it is a Pellet and they like the consistancy of it? The flavor mayby? I would love the answer to that question. also, is Bil Jac planning for the future a completly grain free formula? I know they have Sensitive Solutions but that still has Corn Meal in it. I’m thinking about buying a bag for my dogs to see if they like it. were also getting another dog in a couple months, a Yorkshire Terrier (Yorkie) puppy. I might start the puppy out on that Sensitive Solutions. Any answers or opinions for me?

  • sandy

    Little One,

    A cup of food a day seems a little too much for a 9 yr old 4 lb dog. My 30 lb 6 yr old dog eats 1 cup a day. So does my 10 yr old 27-28 pounder.

  • Victoria

    Oh, I also like Natures variety instinct, they make small size kibble.

  • Victoria

    Little one- have you tried any of the 5 star foods mentioned on this site? most dogs love grain free meat based foods, you might want to look into taste of the wild, nutrisca, wellness core, blue buffalo wilderness, acana and earthborn holistic among others. A lot of these arent sold at chain pet stores, but small specialty or feed stores. You can also use store locator on manufacturers site to find a store near you that carries it or email the company for samples. I know taste of the wild usually will send several samples.

  • melissa

    Little One-

    Forget the old school thought of no human food for dogs. There is nothing wrong with adding a little boiled chicken or meat scrap from your meal-moderation is the key. If you dog truly won’t eat another food, then perhaps top this one with a 5 star canned meat product to up the nutrition levels.

  • LittleOne

    Sorry for the double post. I forgot to mention some of the foods we have tried. Eukanuba when she was younger, before all the problems and I got rid of that. Iams, Kibbles n Bits, Purina Pro, Canine (cant remember the name, the one that sells all the breed specific packaging), Canned Prescription food (By Hills I think), and the Science Diet moist packets.

  • LittleOne

    I have a 4lb 9 year old Chihuahua. She has ALWAYS been a picky eater. I had her on Science Diet most of her life. I relocated in August and she quit eating it. To the point she got sick. Even when she did eat Science Diet she would rarely eat more than a tablespoon a day. When I was at PetsMart in September I was given a sample of Bil-Jac. I was polite ant thanked the lady, but new my pickey little girl wouldn’t eat it. Much to my surprize, she LOVES it! She has been eating like I have never seen her eat before. I would estimate she is now eating around a cup a day. Now, I find this site! I don’t know what to do. This is the first dry food she has ever liked. We have tried many over the years. Her health is of the utmost importance to me, but not eating is not good either! I don’t eat meat myself, and I have always been a firm believer in not feeding dogs people food.

    I thought I had finally found a food she liked and was chicken, and expensive so must be good for her. Now I learn its not, but can it be worse than not eating???

  • Victoria

    I was at petco the other day and was handed a brochure and a coupon by Bil-jac rep. On the second page, a first sentence reads: ” your dog is a carnivore, a meat eating animal.. “. If thats the case, why use corn meal? 

    I really liked Toxed2loss perspective into these studies. I’m a vet tech student and often receive various publications on companion animal nutrition. I have not seen a single one thats been published by an independent nutritionist that is not influenced by a large manufacturer like Hills or Purina. 
    In fact the last article I received touted the benefits of corn, its amazing antioxidant properties, protein content, digestibility etc. When I went go to the citation page, I checked out every single study that the article was based on. The antioxidant benefit claims were from study done on humans not dogs. Another study was done by an agricultural society on cattle, not dogs. I can post that article if anyone is interested. 

    By other issue is byproducts, if they use organs, why not list the specific organs that are used. What about chicken by product meal? is it liver, kidneys or heads, feet and tumors?

    I went on their website and they do not list the complete ingredient list, which doesent make them look particularly reliable. 

  • claudia

    test

  • http://www.facebook.com/Toxed2loss Toxed2loss

    LOL, “Big” in the Hollywood Western vernacular refers to status, not size! I was trying to confer respect!

    Do you prefer I refer to you as “Vanishing Chief White Hair”. LOL, No, that won’t work! You’ll think I’m referring to your hair! Hmmm, how about sloshing Chief White Hair? In regards to all the water you’re drinking? I shall have to convene a pow-wow, and come up with a suitable title to express your exalted emminance. GFETE

  • http://brotherscomplete.com Richard Darlington

    Toxed

    Who said anything about BIG Chief White Hair? I’ve been on a fast now for 10 days and the last 6 have been just water. At this rate I’ll disappear in a few weeks.

  • http://www.facebook.com/Toxed2loss Toxed2loss

    Thank you Big Chief White Hair!!! That meant a lot!

  • http://www.facebook.com/Toxed2loss Toxed2loss

    Amy Phillips,
    You are very welcome!! :-)

  • http://DogFoodAdvisor.com Mike Sagman

    Test Comment #3

  • http://DogFoodAdvisor.com Mike Sagman

    Test Comment #2

  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninja Dog Food Ninja

    You , sir, have test commented successfully. :-D

  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninja Dog Food Ninja

    You know what’s funny about this food? If they traded the corn meal for sweet potatoes, peas, and/or tapioca, and removed the BHA, this would be a 4-4.5 star food. 5-star if they got the protein just a little higher. What a difference TWO ingredients can make! I have no problem with clean by-products, as guts and livers and hearts and such should be in a dog’s diet, anyways.

    You know, if they just used a natural preservative, this would be a 3-3.5 star food right now. But they tout the fact that they don’t used sprayed-on fats, which is what you would preserve kibbles with. so unless they change their views on that, the BHA has to remain out of necessity.

  • Marie

    Amy, Dog Food Ninja is correct – and I would just read around the site a bit more for educational purposes. You simply came off as defensive and touting the Bil-Jac company line as unadulterated truth in a fairly aggressive manner. I apologize, however, for my responses if they have offended you.

  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninja Dog Food Ninja

    Amy, you got a bit of flack not because you had a difference of opinion, but rather because you made a post attacking the integrity of this website in defence of a fairly low quality food and made grand, capitalized statements, as if shouting, that were all grossly incorrect, yet were seemingly presented by you as absolute facts.

    By the way, I only meant to make you think with what I wrote. We should all be less trusting of profit-first corporations and their bought-and-paid-for government regulatory bodies. Stick around and you’ll learn all kinds of interesting stuff. I’d start with the article library and the FAQ. :-)

  • http://brotherscomplete.com Richard Darlington

    Toxed

    That was a well written, clear, and nicely organized presentation – I think well thought out and practical explanations like that about the kind of things that actually go on in the real world of big business (ALL big business) are very helpful to those who have never been exposed to the bigger picture, a broader perspective, or had the benefit of having inside information either from actual experience or observation.

    Presenting a perspective that takes into account the big picture and backs it up with real world experience is far more useful in my opinion than an isolated study. You helped give context and a frame of reference to the information that was presented that I thought was very useful, clarifying, and substantive – WELL DONE !!

  • Amy Phillips

    Thank you TOXED2LESS for not treating me like an idiot….I never claimed to be a scientist or even a brain surgeon…just a person and I am like millions of other people who have questions and feelings. Thank u for treating me like a human being and not insulting me but EDUCATING me.

  • Amy Phillips

    GOSH! IM SORRY! I THOT i was allowed to leave a post with points I wuld like to have proved or disproved in such a way to BETTER understand and instead EVERYONE is crucifying me and making fun of me…..THANKS for all your help.

  • Michelle

    Hi Mike P. I went back and read the whole review, and Mike S. did say “we actually like this dog food” because they removed the Menadione, and he likes their low temp vacuum drying process. It’s a shame that they chose to include by-products, corn meal, BHA, and non- chelated minerals. And then chose to charge a high price, because if people pay a lot of money, they think that the food must be good. You get what you pay for isn’t always true, with dog food, sometimes you are charged a premium price for an inferior product. I agree with this products “not recommended” status. If someone is going to feed Bil Jac they might as well save a lot of money, and just feed the grocery store brand or Ol’roy. :0

  • http://www.facebook.com/Toxed2loss Toxed2loss

    Amy Phillips,
    I’d like to address your comments on citations. It is a common misconception that because one reads a citation saying some thing is ‘this and such’ in a study from ‘what ever renowned university’ that it must then be true. It isn’t necessarily so. In fact, if you devote enough time you can find plenty of studies that say the opposite. Here’s some of the main red flags when considering wether a study is actually reliable.

    First off, who paid for it? Whoever pays for the study has an inordinate amount of influence on the outcome. My daughter took her Ph.D. From Purdue, this year. One of the questions that she asked her prospective advisors when she interviewed schools was would she be able to report the truth? Her advisor assured her she would. So, 4 years of hard work and diligence later, when she was in her final year, getting her thesis ready for presentation, she was informed she had to revise it so that all her answers were “yes.” If she didn’t, they wouldn’t issue her doctorate. Academic extortion.

    I am a member of the Union of Concerned Scientists, this kind of industry pressure and academic extortion is rampant. It is industry that pays for those studies and they control the outcomes. While my daughter was able to ‘tell the truth,” she was not allowed to tell the whole truth, which is lying by omission.

    Now that she has earned her doctorate, she can go forward and tell the truth, however, industry will chose to fund those who will ‘find data that supports their products.’ Many less ethical scientists will set their studies up in such away as to ‘find’ exactly what the funding entity wants, so they can get more funding…

    I looked at the university of Hanover Vet research you repeated from Bil-Jacs web-site. The Purina logo and Name were all over the presentation…

    Here’s the second problem I have, departmentalization. You mention the rate of digestibility and the 900% increase in releasing ‘antioxidants’ when slow cooking. That all looks impressive, but it’s missing the big picture. The research is isolating one component only, and promoting that as a beneficial aspect while ignoring all the other components. You see, there are a number of other biological factors that go along with slow cooking that corn, that are detrimental. They lied by omission! They also lied by inference! A lie is a lie, is a lie, and ALL lies hurt us! But, the data did say what the manufacture wanted…

    Here’s what they didn’t say on Bil-Jacs website when they quoted that study, a tiny sliver of reality than when taken out of context, “appears” to be beneficial:

    Corn is high in citric acid. That’s not vitamin C by the way. Vitamin C is ascorbic acid. Slow processing of corn frees the citric acid. Citric acid is high in free glutamic and Aspartic acids. Free Glutamic acid is MSG, Aspartic acid is 1/2 of aspartame. Both are excitotory neurotoxins. They poison dogs. So, when you are feeding processed corn (and other ‘highly processed’ grains & proteins) you are feeding your dogs toxic substances that happen to be accumulative. It’s comparable to feeding your dog arsenic. You can poison someone slowly over time by feeding them small, undetectable amounts of arsenic. Eventually it accumulates in their tissues to the point that it causes organ damage and they die. Free glutamic and Aspartic acid accumulate the same way.

    The next deceptive aspect of most feeding studies is that they are carried out over a short period of time. If we return to our arsenic analogy and we designed an arsenic study such that quit feeding the subject arsenic before enough had accumulated to produce visual organ damage, we would be able to ‘scientifically conclude’ that “there was no harm done to the subjects who consumed arsenic.” Most studies are carried out for a very short term. They do not represent real world feeding scenarios or effects.

    There are sufficient life time feeding studies done by some very ethical, and brilliant vets and animal nutritionists that show detrimental effects of feeding grains. Are there studies published? Of course not! The industry controls the journals, and their work is denied publication. The truth is suppressed.

    So while the study appears to support corn as an appropriate ingredient in dog food, the study is taking such a narrow, unrealistic approach to reality, that it lies by inference and omission! It’s validity, in knowledgable circles is highly questionable, but it looks impressive enough to fool the masses.

    Here’s the rule: never take the word of someone who’s trying to sell you something, or who will gain from the sale in anyway. They have a vested interest in selling product. Use sources that are not gaining from your purchase and are not affiliated in anyway with promoting the industry.

  • melissa

    Aya-

    Sandy makes a very good point about “retraining” the dog : ) Unless she has a medical condition or is a toy size that may become hypoglycemic, then picking the food up can work wonders. I use toppers, but not every meal as I try to avoid the “demanding” attitudes, lol. I do however have one very picky eater, who will wait me out to the point that he will go days if allowed to-and being a toy size, its not healthy. For him, I rotate(every day) some form of meat into his food-boiled chicken or a 95 percent canned meat topper. I also discovered that crating him for meals works wonders.

  • sandy

    Aye,

    Try topping kibble with raw meat (as mentioned above) like really any meat, but I use organs sometimes, too, like gizzards and liver or scrambled egg or sardines (packed in water).

    It’s ok that your dog doesn’t eat twice a day or once a day. They can go days without food. I like to say your dog’s training you with the pickiness knowing that she’ll get something else or something better…if she doesn’t eat, pick the bowl up after 15 minutes, and try again at the next meal. You need to retrain the dog.

  • Jan (Mom to Cavs)

    Ok you guys…..lol. When people talk about the “bad” stuff being in people food, too, like BHA the first thing that I think of is, sure it’s in people food but I have a choice to either eat it or not. Our animals don’t have that personal choice. They must eat whatever we give them, just like babies or kids. So…I feel it’s my mother’s duty to research and feed the best ingredients I can to my furkids, just like I did to my hukids. If I choose to eat something loaded with “bad” stuff, then that’s just it, it’s my choice. Does that make sense? LOL!

  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninja Dog Food Ninja

    Also, was the elderly receptionist able-bodied, or feeble? These are important factors to consider. When I see an elderly Wal Mart greeter that seems a bit too spry, I get upset.

  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninja Dog Food Ninja

    Oh, and furthermore, your “facts” about the healthfulness of corn that you got directly from Bil-Jac’s website are completely flawed. As a glutenous grass seed with an imbalanced omega ratio, a high inflammatory rating, and antinutrients, it’s just not a good ingredient for anyone… people or pets. Do you sleep better at night knowing you can just blindly trust that for-profit corporations and their government regulatory employees have you and your pet’s best interest in mind?

  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninja Dog Food Ninja

    Amy said

    “ps…BHA is found in everything we HUMANS consume and use everyday such as cosmetics, sugarless gum and diet soda yet no united front is out there to pull all of this crap of the shelves….just saying.”

    SO THAT MAKES IT OKAY???

    First of all, that’s completely wrong. There are many people who actively avoid the stuff and call for it’s removal from our food supply.

    Obedient consumers like you that slavishly defend the use of synthetic, cancer-causing trash in our and our dog’s food supply are one of the main reasons these corporations continue to get away with poisoning us and our pets.

    Just saying.

  • Mike P

    Michelle where in the review “bottom line” 8th paragraph.”We actually like this dog food” He gave them a shout out for eliminating menadione in their formula.Mike did not reccommend this junk.Any word how old the receptionist is?I’ll set the over/under at 70 years of age.The age of the receptionist should be added to the dash board.In the future I will only purchase food from company’s with elderly customer service.I found that a little strange (the age) too Michelle in Amy’s post.

  • Marie

    LOL- Michelle, I know, me neither; I was being a bit facetious there in addressing Amy’s review which seems to take Bil-Jac’s hiring decisions into account as opposed to truly scrutinizing the ingredients the food. Sorry, my sense of humor is rather weird. :)

    I wouldn’t feed it either.

  • Michelle

    Mike P. What review are you reading? Mike S never said that he liked Bil Jac! This is what he said about it- “Bil Jac Dog Food is a grain-based kibble using a notable amount of chicken and chicken by-product meal as its main sources of animal protein, thus earning the brand 2.5 stars.

    Not recommended.” Marie- it’s nice that they employ the elderly, but, it’s not really something that I care about, or take into consideration, when I am looking at a dog food. No offense, but I really couldn’t care less who they employ, the ingredients in their food suck. :(

  • Marie

    I, for one, commend Bil Jac for employing the elderly.

  • Mike P

    I want to know how old the receptionist really is.Did she sound old or did Amy ask her how old she is? Michelle, Mike say’s “we really like this food” on the bottom line.I see it as one step up from the Roy which isn’t saying much.

  • Michelle

    Amy Phillips, Just what is your point? It’s nice that Bil Jac employes an elderly woman as their receptionist, but SO WHAT!? A food cannot be magically better than the ingredients used to make it, so it is of no consequence to me who works there or whether or not they have had a recall. With so many red flag ingredients, I have to agree with Dr. Mike, I would never feed Bil Jac.

  • Marie

    I agree with Mike P

  • Mike P

    Amy I think it’s great that they have a elderly American receptionist.More company’s need to employ old Americans.

  • Amy Phillips

    WOW disappointed that u didnt seem as unbiased as before wen i read some of your other topics… Bil Jac is an AMERICAN COMPANY still FAMILY OWNED and OPERATED and has NEVER had a single dog food RECALL in 67 years of business….unlike TONS of other companies…Bil Jac ALSO is the ONLY dog food company that can say it requires NO TRANSITION TIME in switching to their foods (meaning NO upset bellies and diahrrea during the change!) They are the ONLY dog food company that LISTS what those CHICKEN BY PRODUCTS are ON THE LABEL by choice when it isnt required….and CORN MEAL (finely GROUND corn!!) is 99% digestible for dogs (source: University of Veterinary Med. Hanover) not to mention CORN has the highest total antioxidant activity (more than DOUBLE) compared to rice, wheat, or oats! (source: Cornell University) and because it is corn MEAL…that means HOW the corn is processed and by slow cooking corn into a meal releases 900% more antioxidants! (source: Cornell University) and finally….For people with dogs who are diabetic CORN FED to dogs produces a LOWER GLYCEMIC INDEX THAN RICE (source: University of Queensland). Im sorry but this is RESEARCHED-BASED NUTRITION. ALSO…there is a phone number on the bags and i personally have called it and it rang directly into a receptionist (who was NOT only AMERICAN but elderly)…told them i had a customer in the pet store with a question and was put right thru to a customer service representative who answered their question on the spot. With all the research and amazing personal customer service attention I think the company is worthy of a bit more consideration other than “NOT RECOMMENDED”
    ps…BHA is found in everything we HUMANS consume and use everyday such as cosmetics, sugarless gum and diet soda yet no united front is out there to pull all of this crap of the shelves….just saying.