Zero. That’s how many carbohydrates are required by a dog to sustain life.

The fact that a dog food doesn’t need to contain any “carbs” at all may seem hard to believe.
But it’s true.
You see, according to the National Research Council and compared to the other two major nutrients — protein and fat — no carbs are considered essential for a healthy canine diet.1
Dogs don’t need corn. And they don’t need wheat, barley rice or potatoes.
Dogs simply don’t need any carb-based ingredients — at all.
Yet surprisingly, carbohydrates represent the most common raw materials used for making dry dog food.
How can this be?
Why Dog Food Manufacturers
Love Carbohydrates
Since the early 1950s, dog food manufacturers everywhere have fallen head-over-heels in love with carbohydrates because they’re:
- Cheap (much cheaper than protein or fat)
- Abundant (simple to acquire)
- Durable (long shelf life)
- Essential to the kibble-making process
Please notice that not one of these reasons has anything to do with nutrition — not one.
Are They Safe for Dogs?
Carbohydrates aren’t bad for dogs. In reasonable amounts, they can actually provide a practical source of energy.
The problem lies in their quantity.
Using a dog’s ancestral diet as a model, the total amount of carbs consumed by a dog’s evolutionary predecessor is dramatically less than what has become “the norm” for products created by the pet food industry.
One sensible source estimates natural carbohydrate consumption for a dog’s ancestors at around 14 percent of total diet.2
Yet on average, today’s dry dog foods contain somewhere between 46 and 74 percent carbohydrates.3
The Numbers Aren’t Even Close
Today’s kibbles contain as much as four times the carbohydrate content historically found in the canine ancestral diet.
It looks like the pet food industry may have taken advantage of the dog’s remarkable ability to adapt to just about anything.
OK, maybe the ancestral diet represents an unreasonable extreme.
But considering the dog’s evolutionary background, it just seems that manufacturers may have gone too far in the opposite direction.
Doesn’t it make sense for a dog’s diet to be more more “natural” — more like the canine ancestral diet? With more protein and fat — and fewer carbohydrates?
The Bottom Line
When choosing dog food, it makes good sense to favor products lower in carbohydrates. That’s because as the carbohydrate share of the overall “pie” falls, its protein and fat (meat) content must by necessity also rise.
And even though most dog food companies fail to disclose the percentage of carbohydrates contained in their products, the Dog Food Advisor reports an estimate of this all-important figure inside every review.
So, look for dog foods rich in meat-based protein. You’ll be providing your pet with a diet closer to the one she was naturally designed to eat.
What’s more, you may even be adding years of good health to your best friend’s life.
Footnotes
- National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences, “Nutrient Requirements of Dogs and Cats”, 2006 Edition, National Academies Press, Washington, DC ↩
- Brown S., Taylor B., “See Spot Live Longer”, 2007 Creekobear Press, Eugene, OR USA, page 51 ↩
- National Research Council, National Academy of Science, “Nutrient Requirements of Dogs and Cats”, 2006 Edition, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, p 317 ↩

Pingback: Dog Food Carbohydrates… A Surprising Secret Revealed « The Pooch & Pony Blog