Bil Jac Dog Food (Frozen)

Share

Rating: ★★½☆☆

Bil Jac raw frozen dog food receives the Advisor’s below-average rating of 2.5 stars.

The Bil Jac raw frozen dog food product line includes just 1 recipe, a recipe claimed to meet AAFCO nutrient profiles for all life stages.

Bil Jac Frozen

Raw Dog Food

Estimated Dry Matter Nutrient Content

Protein = 32% | Fat = 14% | Carbs = 46%

Ingredients: Beef, meat by-products, cereal food fines, poultry, poultry meal, animal liver, fish meal, eggs, cane molasses, dried beet pulp, wheat germ meal, brewers dried yeast, phosphoric acid, vitamin A acetate, vitamin D3 supplement, vitamin E supplement, riboflavin supplement, salt, niacin, biotin, choline chloride, folic acid, thiamine mononitrate, pyridoxine hydrochloride (vitamin B6), dl-methionine, vitamin B12 supplement, d-calcium pantothenate, manganous oxide, inositol, ascorbic acid, ferrous sulfate, copper sulfate, zinc oxide, cobalt carbonate, potassium iodide, sodium selenite

Fiber (estimated dry matter content) = 4.5%

Red items when present indicate controversial ingredients

Estimated Nutrient Content
MethodProteinFatCarbs
Guaranteed Analysis18%8%NA
Dry Matter Basis32%14%46%
Calorie Weighted Basis29%31%41%

The first ingredient in this dog food is beef. Beef is defined as “the clean flesh derived from slaughtered cattle” and includes skeletal muscle or the muscle tissues of the tongue, diaphragm, heart or esophagus.1

Beef is naturally rich in all ten essential amino acids required by a dog to sustain life.

The second item lists meat by-products, slaughterhouse waste. This is what’s left of slaughtered animals after all the prime cuts have been removed.

In a nutshell, meat by-products are the unsavory leftovers of processing considered by many “unfit for human consumption”.

With the exception of hair, horns, teeth and hooves, this stuff can include heads, ovaries or developing fetuses.1

What’s worse, this particular item is anonymous. It doesn’t even specify the source animal. So, this meat can come from almost anywhere, even diseased or dying livestock.

Although meat by-products can be high in protein, we do not consider a generic ingredient like this a quality item.

The third ingredient lists cereal food fines. Cereal food fines are an inexpensive by-product of cereal grain processing.

This waste ingredient can possibly contain a measurable amount of sugar left over from the manufacture of breakfast cereals. Food fines are commonly associated with low quality dog foods.

The fourth ingredient lists poultry. Is this chicken, turkey, duck or what? Although poultry can be considered rich in essential amino acids, we would have preferred this item to have been more specifically identified.

The fifth item lists poultry meal. Poultry meal is a cooked down product of unspecified poultry. Since the term “poultry” fails to adequately identify the source animal, we rate this component slightly lower in quality than a single-species meal (like chicken meal).

Just the same, poultry meal is a meat concentrate containing nearly 300% more protein than fresh poultry.

The sixth item is animal liver. Normally, liver can be considered a quality component. However, in this case, the source of the liver is not identified. For this reason, it’s impossible to judge the quality of this item.

The seventh ingredient includes fish meal… another protein-rich meat concentrate.

Unfortunately, this particular item is anonymous. Because various fish contain different types of fats, we would have preferred to have known the source species.

What’s more, the controversial chemical ethoxyquin is frequently used as a preservative in fish meals.

But because it’s usually added to the raw fish before processing, the chemical does not have to be reported to consumers.

We find no public assurances from the company this product is ethoxyquin-free.

Without knowing more, and based upon this fish meal’s location on the list of ingredients, we would expect to find at least a trace of ethoxyquin in this product.

The eighth ingredient lists eggs… a desirable addition. Eggs are easy to digest and have an exceptionally high biological value.

The ninth ingredient mentions cane molasses. Although it’s rich in mineral nutrients, molasses is a less-refined form of sugar with a glycemic index similar to maple syrup. Like table sugar (and in larger amounts), molasses has the ability to raise a dog’s blood sugar.

The tenth ingredient lists beet pulp. Beet pulp is a controversial ingredient… a high fiber by-product of sugar beet processing.

Some denounce beet pulp as an inexpensive filler while others cite its outstanding intestinal health and blood sugar benefits.

We only call your attention here to the controversy and believe the inclusion of beet pulp in reasonable amounts in most dog foods is entirely acceptable.

The next ingredient is wheat germ meal, a mixture of nutritious by-products of the wheat milling process. Containing at least 25% protein, this inexpensive plant-based ingredient can significantly boost the protein content of this dog food.

Brewers dried yeast can be a controversial item. Although it’s a by-product of the beer making process, this ingredient contains about 45% protein and is rich in other healthy nutrients.

Fans believe yeast repels fleas and supports the immune system.

Critics argue yeast ingredients can be linked to allergies. This may be true, but (like all allergies) only if your particular dog is allergic to the yeast itself.

What’s more, a vocal minority insist yeast can increase the risk of developing the life-threatening condition known as bloat. However, this is something we’ve not been able to scientifically verify.

In any case, unless your dog is specifically allergic to it, yeast can be considered a nutritious additive.

From here, the list goes on to include a number of other items.

But to be realistic, ingredients located this far down the list (other than nutritional supplements) are not likely to affect the overall rating of this product.

With one notable exception

The minerals listed here do not appear to be chelated. And that can make them more difficult to absorb. Non-chelated minerals are usually associated with lower quality dog foods.

Bil Jac Raw Frozen Dog Food
The Bottom Line

Judging by its ingredients alone, Bil Jac raw frozen looks to be a below-average dog food.

But ingredient quality by itself cannot tell the whole story. We still need to estimate the product’s meat content before determining a final rating.

The dashboard displays a dry matter protein reading of 32%, a fat level of 14% and estimated carbohydrates of about 46%.

Below-average protein. Below-average fat. And above-average carbs when compared to a typical raw dog food.

With meat dominating the ingredient list, we’re surprised to find the Guaranteed Analysis (published by Bil Jac) reflecting such a low protein and fat content.

What’s more, it’s surprising to find the use of animal meals in this “raw” recipe. Meat meals are typically found in dry kibbles and are rarely used in wet-type dog foods.

Even ignoring the slight plant-based protein-boosting effect of the wheat germ meal, this looks like the nutrient profile of a raw dog food containing a below-average amount of meat.

Bottom line?

Bil Jac raw frozen dog food is a meat-based product using a moderate amount of beef and meat by-products as its main sources of animal protein, thus earning the brand 2.5 stars.

Not recommended.

For even more raw diet suggestions, be sure to visit the Advisor’s Recommended Raw Dog Foods summary page.

A Final Word

This review is designed to help you make a more informed decision when buying dog food. However, our rating system is not intended to suggest feeding a particular product will result in specific health benefits for your pet.

For a better understanding of how we analyzed this product, please be sure to read our article, “The Problem with Dog Food Reviews

Remember, no dog food can possibly be appropriate for every life stage, lifestyle or health condition. So, choose wisely. And when in doubt consult a veterinarian for help.

Have an opinion about this dog food… or maybe the review itself? Please know… we welcome your comments.

Notes and Updates

04/03/2011 Original review
04/03/2011 Last Update

  1. Association of American Feed Control Officials
  2. Association of American Feed Control Officials
Dog Food Advisor IconThe Dog Food Advisor publishes independent reviews to help pet owners make better choices when shopping for dog food.


  • Doug

    Two stars is two stars too MUCH.

  • Lucy

    Dfn-lol.  I completely agree.

    This company should not even try to atempt making raw…I mean come on!…wheat germ meal & cereal food fines!  Raw food is supposed to be MEAT!

  • http://DogFoodAdvisor.com Mike Sagman

    Hi John Wilson… Since they changed their webpage, I checked with Bil Jac today and the company confirms this product is indeed a raw frozen dog food. Hope this helps.

  • John Wilson

    One problem with this review: BilJac frozen isn’t a raw food nor is it advertised by the company as such. Otherwise, great job!

  • Amanda

    I watched my dog’s coat transform from in one month to absolutely spectacular from a 3 star food (that came from the rescue), to a 4 and 5 star food. I would not feed this crap to her if it was the last thing on the shelf. How could you possibly feed this to your dog after reading these ingredients? And how could your dog even look good with these ingredients. How do you really know how your dog feels? If I were to eat McDonalds every day, I certainly would not feel well, but I would at least be able to communicate that. Just don’t understand the reasoning. And bloat is not caused by kibble….

  • Amanda

    I watched my dogs coat transform from in one month to absolutely spectacular from a 3 star food (that came from the rescue), to a 4 and 5 star food. I would not feed this crap to her if it was the last thing on the shelf. How could you possibly feed this to your dog after reading these ingredients? And how could your dog even look good with these ingredients. How do you really know how your dog feels? If I were to eat McDonalds every day, I certainly would not feel well, but I would at least be able to communicate that.

  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninja Dog Food Ninja

    Yeah, it’s pretty gross stuff. I hate Bil Jac. They preserve all their dry food AND their treats with BHA and then they go on and on about how they don’t have to add sprayed-on fats like that’s some big benefit. If they were adding fats, they could preserve the food naturally! And then they bleat on about why corn is a good ingredient for dogs. Uhg

  • Shawna

    WOW!! I had no idea this was a raw food til I read DFN’s post… I agree, a higher quality kibble might be better then this.. If for no other reason then to send a message to the manufacturer…

    I have to wonder how this food could possibly be free of pathogens?? Is it high pressure pasteurized or something?

  • Shawna

    “If your dog looks and feels great on a two and a half star dog food, imagine how they’re going to look and feel eating a 4 or 5 star with high quality ingredients.”

    LOVE that statement Chris!!!!!!! Soooo very true!!

  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninja Dog Food Ninja

    Right-O, Chris. I can’t fathom reading the above descriptions of what meat by-products and cereal fines are and just not caring because the dog seems fine. It’s like, that’s not really the point now, is it? The point is, whether or not your dog looks fine, you are paying top dollar to feed your dog disgusting ingredients. And these are RAW! I think with these ingredients I’d almost rather they be cooked!

  • Chris Valley

    I don’t understand people who will defend a dog food with poor-quality ingredients because their dog “looks great,” or is “thriving.” Would you please read the ingredients?? If your dog looks and feels great on a two and a half star dog food, imagine how they’re going to look and feel eating a 4 or 5 star with high quality ingredients. It won’t necessarily even cost you any more.

  • anna

    my dogs love this stuff. they wont eat nothing else just this. n my puppy that i had gotten double her size in the last 2 months. shes has a nice mucle going on. and a great look to her. my 6yr old husky only looks and acts like shes 2. my pup who is 5months now weighs 25lbs and the vet even said that they both look great.

  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninja Dog Food Ninja

    Ellie, if your dogs do well on this, just imagine how much better they could do on a raw diet that didn’t include nondescript by-products and industrial cereal grain waste!

  • Ellie

    I have fed frozen Bil Jac to my show dogs for over 30 years. I had a dog bloat when she was given dry dog food and survived on Bil Jac. I am a fan for life of raw (?) Bil Jac.

  • Ryo

    Whew. Thank god this was switched to 2.5 stars. Sounds like a salmonella bomb to me- I wouldn’t even think about giving unspecified “poultry”, “meat”, and “fish” of unknown origin to a dog. Where did that come from, anyway? The side of the road? This is the Everpet of the raw food world. Just some advice from me: Leave it on the shelf!

  • Gordon

    Christine A. Gietzen – I’m not aware of this author or book, but thanks for divulging its existence. I may seek it and have a read. The more angles of perspectives read, the more gained in knowledge and ability to scrutinise.

    Bill Jac Raw Frozen Food reads like a commercial raw dog food designed by either assuming Bill Jac is a person or a business deciding on such a name as a brand, of whom or which either knowingly put together such a lack luster and undesirable raw dog food for the purpose of cutting overheads and making sales for profit first – dog health 5th, OR, thought they would impress the market with an unwittingly lack of proper scientifically formulated raw diet that turns almost a complete 180 degrees in the opposite direction away from mimicking a natural ancestral diet.

    This beggars the question Bill Jac – why bother making raw dog food?

  • Elizabeth

    I wouldn’t give this junk to my worst enemy!

  • Jonathan

    Hmmm, I kinda agree with Christine… raw meat by-products? Mixed with Cereal Fines? And sugar? Sounds like a nasty concoction. Maybe this is should be the first 2 1/2 star raw food reviewed!

  • http://www.pridepurrfectgifts.com Christine A. Gietzen

    I have a question totally unrelated to this post, but I did read the review and I must disagree in this food being recommended to anyone wanting to feed raw. I would have rated this with 2 stars or less. For people on a tight budget, I’d rather recommend a dry food with a 4 star rating or above to a person rather than them feeding the Biljac to their precious dog. The good raw diets out there are more expensive for a reason. Enough said… So, there, I’ve said my piece. There are just too many red flags in this food.

    My question is, does anyone here know of or has anyone here read William D. Cusick? I happened to find his site through a google search the other day and he has written a book on Canine Nutrition that centers on breed specific diets. His book basically lists all the known dog breeds with a brief history of each and what kind of food sources they had access to. Some of what he says seems plausible, but I’ve seen a certain attitude in his writing that implies that he has a very one-sided approach to his findings. I’m just wondering what anyone else might have to say regarding this gentleman and his works. Thanks!