Penny’s Tragic Story

Share


In 1995 my wife and I adopted a precious little shelter dog named Penny. Her short but troubled life had been a featured story on a local morning television show.

Penny was a small poodle-terrier mix. Her deep brown eyes concealed the more than two years of daily abuse she had suffered under the care of her previous owner.

Penny quickly filled our home with joy and our hearts with love.

A Special Diet Gets Rejected

But sadly, not long after her adoption, Penny developed a digestive health issue. So, at the recommendation of her doctor, she was placed on a “special” diet… a prescription dog food supplied by her veterinarian.

Little did we know her dog food might eventually contribute to her downfall.

From the very beginning Penny rejected the food.

When we reported the problem to the vet, he suggested we ignore her “attitude”. He assured us she would eventually grow hungry enough to overcome her distaste for the dog food.

And we tried. But we just couldn’t do it.

We just didn’t have the heart to starve our sweet little girl. And yet we innocently trusted this doctor-recommended dog food. After all, the can even looked like medicine… complete with its “scientific” name.

A Sneaky Idea That Works… for a While

So we found a way to disguise the dog food by grinding up our own table meat with the prescription dog food.

And that seemed to do the trick.

For years we continued to feed Penny some form (or another) of that same brew of prescription dog food mixed with our own table food… chicken, beef or pork… even shrimp.

Penny never really welcomed her mealtime concoction. She simply tolerated it. Sometimes she would spend as much as fifteen minutes picking through the mixture trying to avoid the manufactured portion.

Well-Meaning Advice May Have Been Deadly

Then, in 2007, things changed. Following an injury, Penny gradually stopped eating altogether. No matter what we mixed with her food, she simply refused to eat.

So, our new vet suggested we try feeding her canned cat food. She felt the higher meat content would be more appealing to Penny.

And she was right. It worked. Penny began to eat again.

However, when she developed signs of severe weakness and visible weight loss we began to suspect her diet. So, we immediately returned to the old combination. 

But it was too late.

Penny’s condition became visibly worse. Her chronic ear infections (which she had suffered from most of her life) intensified wildly.

She lost even more weight.

Then, on December 1, Penny reached the point where she could no longer move. She was euthanized at 9:30 that morning.

The Biggest Mistake You Could Ever Make
When Choosing Dog Food

As I write this it’s still difficult to choke back the tears.

Because of what happened to Penny, I became painfully aware of something… something I had ignored over a lifetime of caring for all my family dogs.

I had taken for granted the nutritional design and safety of commercial dog food.

You see, 2007 was also the year of the U. S. government’s now infamous pet food recall. And we were shocked when weeks later, we found Penny’s brand of cat food was on the FDA’s list.

Unfortunately, we had already discarded the surviving cans. And it was too late to compare the published lot numbers against that official list.

Was this what took Penny’s life? Or was it what we later discovered to be the nutritional inferiority of her predominantly corn-based (nearly meatless) diet?

In all those years of caring for Penny it never once occurred to me that I might be feeding her anything that could jeopardize her life.

In fact, quite the opposite… I had always thought that because I was paying extra for a premium dog food, I was surely giving her the very best.

Yet it appears we may have unknowingly (for a lifetime) robbed Penny of proper nutrition.

Had we slowly (yet innocently) starved to death a beloved member of our own family?

How to Learn from Penny’s Story
and Add Years to Your Dog’s Life

I know your dog must certainly be a cherished member of your family, too. And I know you would never knowingly do anything to endanger your beloved pet.

But what you don’t know could do just that.

Well, now, I’ve finally found a more predictable, scientific way to recognize the better commercial pet foods to feed my dog.

That’s why I created The Dog Food Advisor… to share with you what I’ve learned. And to show you how to keep Penny’s tragic story from happening to your dog, too.

So, give your precious pet the best opportunity for living a long and healthy life. Provide her with a safer and more nutritious dog food. To do that you must…

  • Be aware of the enormous range of dog food quality
  • Recognize the better brands
  • Avoid choosing an inferior product

With a little effort, you can significantly improve the chances of feeding your dog a healthy and more biologically appropriate diet.

Dog Food Advisor IconThe Dog Food Advisor publishes independent reviews to help pet owners make better choices when shopping for dog food.


  • Pingback: Tripawds Blogs | Learn About Quality Dog Food Ingredients for Your Three Legged Dog | Three Legged Dog Amputation Canine Bone Cancer Support Information Help Advice

  • Pingback: Dog diet tips – and warnings | Shayna the Miracle Dog

  • Pingback: Helpful websites and web articles | Shayna the Miracle Dog

  • Dianna E

    Hey Mike this one of your oldest (not in age) patients. My 2 small dogs, would rather starve than eat dry food. I am assuming that canned food is just as good for them. It seems that most people use dry food, but I leave the dry food there and it seems that they hardly eat any, so I have decided to give them canned food. They eat it fine. I have been feeding them canned Iams, but I think I will change to Blue Buffalo, because I can get it from PetSmart.

  • http://www.whosyourvet.com Sandi
  • ShamelessRawFoodie

    Tracie – ‘Science Diet Scam’ referenced by Sandi is a good explanation of the problem that pet parents encounter with too many vets, and explains how a “self-respecting vet who cares about animals” could be “recommending a food” like Science Diet.

    On the ‘Commercial Dog Foods’ link referenced by Sandi, please read with caution the section on menadione. The writer, Mary Straus of DogAware, states “I would not avoid a food just because it contains this ingredient.” But Mike Sagman offers this article with information about synthetic vitamin K3, ‘The Controversy Over Menadione in Dog Food’ where Mike states “Until there’s a peer-reviewed scientific study proving the safety of menadione, I’d recommend shoppers give preference to products that don’t contain this potentially dangerous ingredient.”
    http://www.dogfoodadvisor.com/choosing-dog-food/menadione-in-dog-food/

  • http://www.whosyourvet.com Sandi

    Tracie – Congrats on your new arrival! Too bad we can’t post pictures – I love puppy pics.
    http://dogaware.com/diet/commercial.html#puppies

    “Is the vet unaware, and is this common? …or could it be that she pushes it because it’s sold at her office?
    I can’t imagine any self-respecting vet who cares about animals recommending a food for that reason though… Any thoughts?”

    I’m assuming you are referring to Hills Science Diet.
    http://www.ourdogsonline.com/content/sciencedietscam.html

    Once you learn what’s really in pet food and know how to read a label, you’ll be able to decide for yourself which brand is better. Mike has good articles for you to read. Check out Article Library.

    My breeder had my guy on Science Diet. I gave my Whippet one month to adjust to his new environment and then switched to an “holistic” kibble. Keep in mind each dog is different, some good well on a certain brand/diet while others do not. Do what works for you and your puppy.

  • Gordon

    Ahhh sorry Mike. I didn’t see that you just posted a response a minute before me.

  • Gordon

    Tracie – There’s been tons of posts on the very thoughts you’re after. But of course if you’re new, it would take a bit of sifting through the posts under various threads. I’ve got to go temporarily, and if someone doesn’t respond with an answer that closely resembles what is believed as the truth about this problem, I’ll shed my thoughts for you.

    People usually here that will be able to give you some good thoughts on this, including myself, are Jonathan, Shameless and Richard to name a few.

  • http://DogFoodAdvisor.com Mike Sagman

    Hi Tracie… Your vet is probably recommending a dog food she’s had good results with. Our ratings are not based upon expected results but about the apparent quality of the ingredients and the amount of meat that were used to make the food. Why not ask your vet this question. She’s the only one that could possibly know the real answer to your question. Hope this helps.

  • Tracie

    I’m hoping someone here might be able to answer a question for me. My vet has recommended a food for my new puppy that has only rated 2 stars on this site. Does anyone know why that might be? I told her I wanted to transition the dog from a food that I considered low quality to a better quality food. When I came home and checked out the one she recommended, it rated no better than the one the breeder had been giving the pup.
    Is the vet unaware, and is this common? …or could it be that she pushes it because it’s sold at her office? I can’t imagine any self-respecting vet who cares about animals recommending a food for that reason though… Any thoughts?

  • Gordon

    Speaking of organic meats and to add to recent posted debates had with Sandi, I’m happy to report that BARF patties do indeed contain meats that are completely antibiotic, hormone, and sulphur (sulfur) dioxide free!

    I was refreshing up the Dr. B’s pdf product guide because it’s been a while since I last read it and I wanted to read more about the cat BARF patties, for the cat I recently rescued, and it confirms all meats are as stated above. Also every flavour has more than the one meat protein source as obviously does the combo flavour.

    BARF is actually suitable for many ailing and compromising immune disorders. For example, their is the new BARF combo Lite which is the combo version with less fat and along with the Kangaroo formula which is notably lower in fat, are ideal for dogs with pancreatic problems as well as diabetes etc.

    The guide also specifies and encourages for such disorders and others, that one can add low GI (non starchy veggies and fruits), and mashed in a juicer and added to the kangaroo or combo lite formula’s or any formulas for that matter as well as any other commercial raw brands as this also increases the alkaline (pH) level, that some dogs may otherwise find the natural acidity levels, a little too high.

    Anyway, I think I should be posting this type of info under the BARF thread.

    Also you can give cats BARF dog patties and vice versa, unlike processed kibbles which are not cross species advisable! That explains why the cat I rescued yesterday, smelt the BARF I was putting out for breakfast for my dogs this morning (well yesterday morning Sydney time as of writing this post), and was salivating over it. This also tells me whoever fed it previously, was feeding it home scraps of raw offcuts and why that cat happily ate the human grade can of sardines I had in the cupboard when I rescued it.

  • Jonathan

    I get what you’re saying Cathy. Organic is always better. But my main point was than “holistic” is an unregulated term that can be twisted and distorted to mean nearly anything. For the average partially educated dog food consumer, the words “holistic grain-free all natural” on a bag means “best possible kibble”. Even if it’s a bag of chicken-flavored potato. And likewise, while Newman’s Own Organic uses organic ingredients, there is precious little meat content in the food. So to me, I’d rather my dog had a higher meat content food then spend extra on a bag of organic rice. You know what I mean?

  • ShamelessRawFoodie

    Jonathan – “kibble can only be so good” is true since cooking diminishes some nutrients, even if the ingredients started out as ‘organic’. And this is why nutrient supplements are included in all cooked dog foods that are rated ‘complete and balanced’.

    But the more important aspect of ‘organic’ is what ISN’T in the food – synthetic pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, hormones, antibiotics, GMO, irradiation, and even nonsynthetic arsenic and strychnine. When these chemicals and treatments are part of plant or livestock growth, they don’t simply disappear when the food is cooked. So your mainstream, non-organic kibble is made with ingredients that have the remnants of all of these questionable substances. And your dog is ingesting, and oftentimes retaining, those poisons.

    There is always the argument that regulation is lacking, whereby certified organic farmers can violate the rules. Of course there are violators of any law, policy or rule, which is why I advocate KNOW YOUR FARMER, KNOW YOUR FOOD. But with ‘organic’, I feel confident that I’m avoiding most poisons.

    http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/nop

  • Jonathan

    I have always been under the impression that the term “holistic” is kind of a wishy-washy type term anyways. It’s certainly a term the pet food industry has wiped it’s butt with. What is “holistic” about a bag of fish flavored rice as far as dogs are concerned? Yet there are tons of “holistic” branded dog foods that are nothing more than that. I think “holistic” and “natural” are hot-button marketing words. “Organic”, consequently, does have a government required meaning. Yet I still question why it’s necessary to use organic ingredients for their higher nutrient levels because that’s going to be cooked right out anyways. Organic Raw foods I get. But kibble? I think we can all agree that kibble can only be so good. As long as the ingredients listed are not industrial by-products and/or meat items that can potential contain dead pets and road kill, then I’m happy with it. As far as kibble goes. Holistic is commercial. It’s just an advertising term with no legal definition.

  • ShamelessRawFoodie

    Sandi – You oddly requested “Gordon & Cathy – can you tell us your background and involvement with this site.” It now seems you made this inquiry because you thought we were enlisted to generate “a large amount of traffic, time spent on the site, etc”?

    It’s a shame that disagreeing with you leads you to believe that we have covert motives. I have no ulterior motive and have made comments about my background on many DFA posts. Like Gordon, I have some experience with legal, court, government business. My background also includes auditing, financial counseling and investigative work. We probably tend to notice the ‘details’ more than some.

    Sandi, you also write “since you don’t have a medical or nutrition background, I think it wise to be careful what you write, people tend to believe what they read.”
    I don’t need a medical or nutrition background to know how to eat, which is one of the most basic functions we humans, and wolves, have managed for eons without ‘expert’ assistance.

  • Gordon

    Could be Shameless? I would just prefer she keep an open mind and not jump to conclusions. We’ve both, including others have said nice things about her, as well as freely admitting that she indeed has input a great deal of interesting information.

    I just don’t understand why some are just so sensitive when questioned. We’re all human and we can all and do learn from each other!

  • ShamelessRawFoodie

    Hey Gordon – Nice to see that you gave the ‘long version’ answer to Sandi of holistic/commercial.
    I’ve also wondered about Sandi ‘wanting to just promote her book here as the be all end all’.
    I don’t doubt that her book has a pile of helpful information to pet parents. But I’m guessing that we are piercing some holes in some of her logic presented in her book. Maybe her book is printed with her comment “holistic foods are better than commercial” and now we are pointing out a problem with using this phrase. IDK.

  • Gordon

    Wow, Shameless, talk about submitting a comment in the exact same minute. You must have just beaten me by seconds, lol

  • ShamelessRawFoodie

    Sandi – About me and Gordon, you write that we “don’t know the difference between holistic & commercial. It’s not a terminology I made up.”

    For pet food, there isn’t any regulation or legal definition of ‘holistic’. You can research FDA, AAFCO, etc.
    So, any pet food brand labeled as holistic is a commercial pet food.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog_food
    Certain manufacturers label their products with terms such as premium, ultra premium, natural and holistic. Such terms currently have no legal definitions. #

  • Gordon

    So Sandi – It seems to have bothered you plenty. You wrote “FADE OUT” and yet you still want the last word.

    Calm down. Try not to be so defensive. I’ve made plenty of errors myself and admit I, too, have learned quite a bit from this site as well as many others. It’s OK to make an error and someone else to correct it or at least explain why they think you got it wrong. Wasn’t I objective and nice to you in my elaboration of what I know to be “commercial”? I mean, I only have an Associate Diploma in Electrical Engineering, a Bachelor degree in Electrical Technology and when I’m ready, only need another 6 months at Uni to complete my degree in Electrical Engineering. I also deal with solicitors (Lawyers) in my current profession and know and how the legal courts operate, and you’d then be surprised and disappointed to know that my argument that “holistic” marketplace foods are commercial items for the public to have purchase access to! It’s not an opinion. It is a fact.

    You just don’t seem to understand that anything available for purchase in the market place to the public is “commercial”. To write a book, should take one to have a basic vocabulary, and understanding of legal meanings, surely?

    A product can be marketed as “holistic”, but is still a commercial product. How can you not see this?

    And regarding Shameless’s (Cathy’s) ‘HUH’ remark, I get plenty of that type of attitude from a particular someone else here. It’s as if they just don’t have anything nice to say about you and just knit pick on what you say may be debatable. I won’t mention that person’s name because it did bother me at first, but I don’t give this person a second thought anymore, because he or she seems to wait in the shadows then pounce on a questionable statement and yet has hardly ever gave any substantial and helpful advice.

    This is not the same about Cathy, to you Sandi, nor anyone else, and she has also at times commended on your informative input.

    I may have now been mistaken in my impression that you’re a “caring and warm hearted person”. It appears to me, that you may be only accepting that it is your way or the highway, and that you could be wanting to just promote your book here as the be all end all. IDK.

    http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/holistic

    “–adjective
    1.
    incorporating the concept of holism in theory or practice: holistic psychology.
    2.
    identifying with principles of holism in a system of therapeutics, especially one considered outside the mainstream of scientific medicine, as naturopathy or chiropractic, and usually involving nutritional measures.”

    World English Dictionary:-

    “— adj
    1. of or relating to a doctrine of holism
    2. of or relating to the the medical consideration of the complete person, physically and psychologically, in the treatment of a disease”

    http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/holistic

    “Definition of HOLISTIC
    1
    : of or relating to holism
    2
    : relating to or concerned with wholes or with complete systems rather than with the analysis of, treatment of, or dissection into parts ”

    http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/commercial

    “–adjective
    1.
    of, pertaining to, or characteristic of commerce.
    2.
    engaged in commerce.
    3.
    prepared, done, or acting with sole or chief emphasis on salability, profit, or success: a commercial product; His attitude toward the theater is very commercial.”

    “–noun
    12.
    Radio and Television . a paid advertisement or promotional announcement.
    13.
    (in U.S. government grading of beef)
    a.
    a low-quality grade of beef between standard and utility.
    b.
    a cut of beef of this grade.
    14.
    British Informal . a traveling salesperson.”

    World English Dictionary:-

    “— adj
    1. of, connected with, or engaged in commerce; mercantile
    2. sponsored or paid for by an advertiser: commercial television
    3. having profit as the main aim: commercial music
    4. (of goods, chemicals, etc) of unrefined quality or presentation and produced in bulk for use in industry”

    http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/commercial

    “Definition of COMMERCIAL
    1
    a (1) : occupied with or engaged in commerce or work intended for commerce (2) : of or relating to commerce (3) : characteristic of commerce (4) : suitable, adequate, or prepared for commerce b (1) : being of an average or inferior quality (2) : producing artistic work of low standards for quick market success
    2
    a : viewed with regard to profit
    b : designed for a large market
    3
    : emphasizing skills and subjects useful in business

    4
    : supported by advertisers ”

    “Legal Dictionary

    Main Entry: com·mer·cial
    Function: adjective
    : of or relating to commerce — com·mer·cial·ly adverb
    Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary of Law, © 1996 Merriam-Webster, Inc. ”

    Now, sure, holistic is a good choice of word to advertise foods that a manufacturer wants to be seen a an alternative holistically healthier food that may be seen as even medicinal. However, same is a commercial product by its very definition, as such are available to be accessed by the public and therefore are also commercial products, be it “holistic’ alternatives to mainstream commercial counterparts.

    So you don’t feel bad at all. That’s good. I’m glad for you. I am happy to continue to discuss or even further elaborate the facts and will not use “FADE OUT”. :)

  • ShamelessRawFoodie

    Whoa! Yes, Jonathan, a wee bit confusing. I’ve missed your comments! We’ll soon know how well, and how often, you can type while holding 2 babies!
    I think you missed the thread about dried herbs and feng shui! Reading that would help shed some light on this thread.

  • Jonathan

    Um, I have no idea what she’s talking about. anyone else lost?

  • http://www.whosyourvet.com Sandi

    Mike & Gordon – Not an odd question at all. I’m referring to the dialogue between myself, Cathy & Gordon on:
    http://www.dogfoodadvisor.com/dog-food-reviews/brothers-complete-grain-free-dog-food/

    ShamelessRawFoodie July 20, 2011 at 12:52 pm
    Sandy – You write “I think the holistic foods are better than commercial . . .”? HUH ? What is a holistic food? In what aspects is a ‘holistic’ food better than a ‘commercial’ food? Aren’t the DFA-reviewed foods all ‘commercial’ foods? Or are some foods ‘holistic’ and some foods ‘commercial?”

    I was shocked by that response and Gordon’s follow-up since both are constantly providing advice to others yet they don’t know the difference between holistic & commercial. It’s not a terminology I made up. I worked for a pet related internet company & I know in order to get sponsors, you need to have a large amount of traffic, time spent on the site, etc. I thought that was their MO to keep that thread going.

    Gordon & Cathy – Here’s another opinion, in addition to my holistic vets & Melissa, re: feeding raw to a dog with a compromised immune system: http://www.alldoghealth.com/raw-food-diet-for-dogs/

    IMO, since you don’t have a medical or nutrition background, I think it wise to be careful what you write, people tend to believe what they read.

    My last remark on this subject for Gordon: “When I say “raw is king”, I do, because it is.”

    If that is the case, I wouldn’t think you’d be feeding Artemis and would feed totally raw. To me, feeding raw is grinding up fresh organic meats, organs, bones in a balanced diet not opening a frozen patty. There is another risk in buying store bought “raw” if it’s not stored properly or something happens in-transit, but that’s another discussion I’m not getting into. Once again, and if you go back to read what I wrote, I’m not trying to convince you not to feed raw.

    “So Sandi – Don’t feel bad about people disagreeing with you. It’s a right and forms part of freedom and liberty to do so.”

    I don’t feel bad at all. Everyone is entitled to their opinion! I previously wrote FADE OUT – means picture darkens & disappears. I’m not further debating any of the above. FADE OUT

  • Robin Senor

    Mike, I had no idea that was why you started this site. I cannot begin to fathom your loss, and then to have corporate lackeys like Samantha above add insult to injury…well…you’re a saint for not having yanked that nonsense the day it went up.

    I hope you gain some comfort in knowing your efforts have truly helped enrich, and I’m sure in many cases, save the lives of millions of dogs. I know thanks to your research my dogs have lived longer and healthier lives; I’ve been feeding them Orijen for three years. We just switched vets due to a move and after her senior blood panel came back, our vet told us our corgi is extrodinarily healthy for her age based on her medical profile (and she was happy to hear we are feeding orijen!).

    Now, we have helped save the life of another dog who had miserable food intolerances…unfortunately his vet had him on a hills low-allergen formula, so we are slowly moving him off that onto something better. Thank you for all you do.

  • Gordon

    Sandi – That is an odd question, but you just may be mistakenly thinking that we’re some sort of affiliates with Mike’s website. Not the case at all.

    Our, or perhaps I should just speak for myself on this one. I have no further or less involvement with this website than you, Sandi. I’m just another commenter/poster, posting comments on this site just like you.

    Jonathan’s comment about being knocked out of the top spot is only because I’ve made more recent postings in the last 60 days. That’s all. Even you can take the top spot if you were to make more postings than anyone else in any given last 60 day lot. Jonathan, just hasn’t been making as many postings as he usually does because let’s face it, he has a much bigger priority with his partner expecting twins any day.

    As for my back ground? That’s for me to know and you to not find out, lol. :P

    Seriously though, my education has nothing to do with canine nutrition or canine related. I have an avid interest in it, and one doesn’t have to be a qualified expert in same to comment and impart any knowledge on the subject. Mike is a good example of that, being a human dentist.

    My current profession/occupation is not related to my education either. Let’s just say I’m in surveillance type work. And no, not website surveillance.

  • Mike P

    Sandi , the flies seem to have been alot less lately . Why the backround check on Cathy and Gordo ? Seems odd u would ask that …

  • http://www.whosyourvet.com Sandi

    Jonathan – Best of luck with your babies. I’m sure your newborns will keep you pretty busy – we’ll understand if we never hear from you again. :)

    Hi Mike P. – how’s the fly situation???

  • http://www.whosyourvet.com Sandi

    Gordon & Cathy – can you tell us your background and involvement with this site. Thanks!

  • Mike P

    Jonathan thanks , and all the best to you , your wife , and the babies . Hi Sadie … Keep me posted

  • Jonathan

    Hey Mike P, no babies yet… but any day now! That’s why i haven’t been posting much… Gordo and Cathy both knocked me outta the number one spot! lol oh well. As far as grain free, yes, I think TOTW is the cheapest. Perfectly Natural has a grain-free coming out that should be in the price ball-park, I just don’t know when or how much.

  • Gordon

    Actually, I take your points, Michelle, Jonathan, and J Aaron. Such unwarranted comments do need to be addressed, for the reasons you mention J Aaron.

    Yes I’m all for symbolically ‘bashing’ Samantha for her ridiculous trouble stirring comments!

  • Mike P

    Jonathan , good to hear from ya ! I always read your post . Did you have your babies ??? To make this ok , as I ripped people here in the past for not talking about the food lol . What is the most affordable grain free dog food ? Fromms went up 7 bucks as did Before grain and Wellness Core . Thinking TOTW is the lowest cost …

  • J Aaron

    I think false and ignorant statements need to be addressed, otherwise other ignorant people reading here may think she’s right and we’re unable to answer her charges. My intent was to call into question her “expertise” on the matter and who’s feeding her her information.

    Of course, as always, Mike handled it well, and I’ve appreciated the other comments also.

  • Jonathan

    While I do sort of agree with Gordon, I also love all the bashing of Samantha and her mean-spirited crap that every one has thrown at her. Hey Samantha, how about you eat Science Diet for 30 days then let us know how you’re feeling? Hey, when your anal glands become inflamed, do you scooch across the living-room carpet or just troll on blogs until you feel better? lol

  • Michelle

    Richard Darlington- WELL SAID!!!!!!! To Gordon- maybe your right, but when someone writes something so completely distasteful and ignorant, you just really feel the need to respond to their outrageous comments. You really have to question her motives and sometimes you just have to call a bitch a bitch……….

  • Gordon

    Guys – You have just provided Samantha with the attention she hoped for, and is being entertained by. She has done a runner and is no doubt reading the fallout.

    I wouldn’t have even paid any attention to such a comment, let alone dignify it with a response.

  • http://www.whosyourvet.com Sandi

    There’s nothing I can add after reading everyone’s comments except:

    “What you didn’t mention was how the manufacturers of the veterinary food diets financially supported the owners of animals that were suffering from renal failure caused by the contaminated food. ”

    Well isn’t that nice of them….do you think the lawsuit had anything to do with them coming up with a small amount to compensate the owners for losing their best friend???

    http://www.petfoodsettlement.com/

    “For example, Medical Royal Canin now screens every raw ingredient that comes into their factor to ensure there are no contaminants. Any abnormality noted and the entire shipment is turned away. They use the same technology as used in the manufacturing of human food. ”

    Isn’t that lovely – why haven’t all pet food companies been doing this before the tragic loss of pets – huh Samantha???

    Mike is educating pet parents in the harmful ingredients that are in pet food. I’m not a Vet or nutritionist, but I know when I see certain ingredients to stay away from that brand. My Vet recommended RC for an issue we had at that time. After reading the ingredients, I didn’t listen to him – didn’t want to present anymore problems.

    Hey Sam, how about telling us about the silent recalls pet food does?

    Mike, I hope you don’t take her comments to heart. We are all grateful for all the time you put into your website. I believe in karma – what goes around comes around – you better duck Samantha!!!!