Taste of the Wild (Dry)


Rating: ★★★★½

Taste of the Wild Dog Food receives the Advisor’s second-highest tier rating of 4.5 stars.

The Taste of the Wild product line includes seven dry dog foods, four claimed to meet AAFCO nutrient profiles for all life stages and three for adult maintenance.

The following is a list of recipes available at the time of this review.

  • Taste of the Wild Sierra Mountain (4 stars)
  • Taste of the Wild Wetlands Formula (5 stars)
  • Taste of the Wild Southwest Canyon (5 stars)
  • Taste of the Wild High Prairie Formula (5 stars)
  • Taste of the Wild Pacific Stream Formula (4 stars)
  • Taste of the Wild High Prairie Puppy Formula (4 stars)
  • Taste of the Wild Pacific Stream Puppy Formula (4 stars)

Taste of the Wild High Prairie Puppy Formula was selected to represent the other products in the line for this review.

Taste of the Wild High Prairie Puppy

Dry Dog Food

Estimated Dry Matter Nutrient Content

Protein = 31% | Fat = 19% | Carbs = 42%

Ingredients: Buffalo, lamb meal, sweet potatoes, egg product, pea protein, peas, potatoes, canola oil, tomato pomace, bison, roasted venison, beef, flaxseed, potato fiber, natural flavor, ocean fish meal, salmon oil (a source of DHA), salt, choline chloride, dried chicory root, Yucca schidigera extract, tomatoes, blueberries, raspberries, dried Lactobacillus acidophilus fermentation product, dried Bifidobacterium animalis fermentation product, dried Lactobacillus reuteri fermentation product, vitamin E supplement, iron proteinate, zinc proteinate, copper proteinate, ferrous sulfate, zinc sulfate, copper sulfate, potassium iodide, thiamine mononitrate (vitamin B1), manganese proteinate, manganous oxide, ascorbic acid, vitamin A supplement, biotin, niacin, calcium pantothenate, manganese sulfate, sodium selenite, pyridoxine hydrochloride (vitamin B6), vitamin B12 supplement, riboavin (vitamin B2), vitamin D supplement, folic acid

Fiber (estimated dry matter content) = 5.6%

Red items when present indicate controversial ingredients

Estimated Nutrient Content
Guaranteed Analysis28%17%NA
Dry Matter Basis31%19%42%
Calorie Weighted Basis26%39%35%

The first ingredient in this dog food is buffalo. Although it is a quality item, raw buffalo contains about 80% water. After cooking, most of that moisture is lost, reducing the meat content to just a fraction of its original weight.

After processing, this item would probably account for a smaller part of the total content of the finished product.

The second ingredient is lamb meal. Lamb meal is considered a meat concentrate and contains nearly 300% more protein than fresh lamb.

The third ingredient is sweet potato. Sweet potatoes are a gluten-free source of complex carbohydrates in a dog food. They are naturally rich in dietary fiber and beta carotene.

The fourth ingredient is egg product, an unspecified (wet or dry?) form of shell-free eggs. Quality can vary significantly. Lower grade egg product can even come from commercial hatcheries — from eggs that have failed to hatch.

In any case, eggs are easy to digest and have an exceptionally high biological value.

The fifth ingredient is pea protein, what remains of a pea after removing the starchy part of the vegetable.

Even though it contains over 80% protein, this ingredient would be expected to have a lower biological value than meat.

And less costly plant-based products like this can notably boost the total protein reported on the label — a factor that must be considered when judging the meat content of this dog food.

The sixth ingredient includes peas. Peas are a quality source of carbohydrates. And like all legumes, they’re rich in natural fiber.

However, peas contain about 25% protein, a factor that must be considered when judging the meat content of this dog food.

The seventh ingredient is potato. Potatoes can be considered a gluten-free source of digestible carbohydrates. Yet with the exception of perhaps their caloric content, potatoes are of only modest nutritional value to a dog.

The eighth ingredient is canola oil. Unfortunately, canola can be a controversial item. That’s because it can sometimes (but not always) be derived from genetically modified rapeseed.

Yet others cite the fact canola oil can be a significant source of essential omega-3 fatty acids.

In any case, plant-based oils like canola are less biologically available to a dog than fish oil as a source of quality omega-3 fats.

The ninth ingredient is tomato pomace. Tomato pomace is a controversial ingredient, a by-product remaining after processing tomatoes into juice, soup and ketchup.

Many praise tomato pomace for its high fiber and nutrient content, while others scorn it as an inexpensive pet food filler.

Just the same, there’s probably not enough tomato pomace here to make much of a difference.

From here, the list goes on to include a number of other items.

But to be realistic, ingredients located this far down the list (other than nutritional supplements) are not likely to affect the overall rating of this product.

With four notable exceptions

First, flaxseed is one of the best plant sources of healthy omega-3 fatty acids. Provided they’ve first been ground into a meal, flax seeds are also rich in soluble fiber.

However, flaxseed contains about 19% protein, a factor that must be considered when judging the actual meat content of this dog food.

Next, salmon oil is naturally rich in the prized EPA and DHA type of omega-3 fatty acids. These two high quality fats boast the highest bio-availability to dogs and humans.

Depending on its level of freshness and purity, salmon oil should be considered a commendable addition.

In addition, chicory root is rich in inulin, a starch-like compound made up of repeating units of carbohydrates and found in certain roots and tubers.

Not only is inulin a natural source of soluble dietary fiber, it’s also a prebiotic used to promote the growth of healthy bacteria in a dog’s digestive tract.

And lastly, this food contains chelated minerals, minerals that have been chemically attached to protein. This makes them easier to absorb. Chelated minerals are usually found in better dog foods.

Taste of the Wild Dog Food
The Bottom Line

Judging by its ingredients alone, Taste of the Wild Dog Food looks like an above-average dry product.

But ingredient quality by itself cannot tell the whole story. We still need to estimate the product’s meat content before determining a final rating.

The dashboard displays a dry matter protein reading of 31%, a fat level of 19% and estimated carbohydrates of about 42%.

As a group, the brand features an average protein content of 31% and a mean fat level of 18%. Together, these figures suggest a carbohydrate content of 43% for the overall product line.

And a fat-to-protein ratio of about 57%.

Above-average protein. Above-average fat. And below-average carbs when compared to a typical dry dog food.

When you consider the protein-boosting effect of the pea protein, peas and flaxseed in this recipe, and the potato protein and garbanzo beans contained in other recipes, this looks like the profile of a kibble containing a moderate amount of meat.

Bottom line?

Taste of the Wild Dog Food is a plant-based kibble using a moderate amount of various named species as its main sources of animal protein, thus earning the brand 4.5 stars.

Highly recommended.

Please note certain recipes are sometimes given a higher or lower rating based upon our estimate of their total meat content and (when appropriate) their fat-to-protein ratios.

Taste of the Wild Recall History

The following list (if present) includes all dog food recalls since 2009 directly related to this product line. If there are no recalls listed in this section, we have not yet reported any events.

You can view a complete list of all dog food recalls sorted by date. Or view the same list sorted alphabetically by brand.

To learn why our ratings have nothing to do with a product’s recall history, please visit our Dog Food Recalls FAQ page.

Get free dog food recall alerts sent to you by email. Subscribe to The Advisor’s recall notification list.

Dog Food Coupons
and Discounts

Readers are invited to share news about coupons and discounts with others in our Dog Food Coupons Forum.

Or click the buying tip below. Please be advised we receive a fee for referrals made to the following online store.

A Final Word

The descriptions and analyses expressed in this and every article on this website represent the views and opinions of the author.

The Dog Food Advisor does not test dog food products.

We rely almost entirely on the integrity of the information posted by each company on its website. As such, the accuracy of every review is directly dependent upon the quality of the test results from any specific batch of food a company chooses to publish.

Although it's our goal to ensure all the information on this website is correct, we cannot guarantee its completeness or its accuracy; nor can we commit to ensuring all the material is kept up-to-date on a daily basis.

Each review is offered in good faith and has been designed to help you make a more informed decision when buying dog food.

However, due to the biological uniqueness of every animal, none of our ratings are intended to suggest feeding a particular product will result in a specific dietary response or health benefit for your pet.

For a better understanding of how we analyze each product, please read our article, "The Problem with Dog Food Reviews".

Remember, no dog food can possibly be appropriate for every life stage, lifestyle or health condition. So, choose wisely. And when in doubt, consult a qualified veterinary professional for help.

In closing, we do not accept money, gifts or samples from pet food companies in exchange for special consideration in the preparation of our reviews or ratings.

To learn how we support the cost of operating this website, please visit our public Disclosure and Disclaimer page.

Have an opinion about this dog food? Or maybe the review itself? Please know we welcome your comments.

Notes and Updates

05/09/2015 Last Update

  • Karen Mitchell

    Hi Hesham. How is puppy now that he has had processed food for the first 6 months of his life? Please look into making the transition to a natural raw diet. If your on Facebook, look up As Nature Intended.
    I have been researching the all natural balanced RAW diet (and commercial pet food) for the past 6 years. I now share what I have learnt through my Facebook group, As Nature Intended.
    If you would like some advice from people, from all walks of life, professionals, pet carers, cancer researchers and people you have taken on the challenge of researching the RAW diet themselves. People who have made the transition successfully or have been feeding their pet on raw for years, my Facebook group is there to help. Great tips, hints and advice and guidance 24/7
    A healthy best friend is a natural raw diet

  • Karen Mitchell

    Yes. Processed commercial pet food is fattening! It’s filled with carbs!!

    Of course, conmmercial dog food manufacturers, along with pet food store and vets do not want pet owners to get educated and take charge of feeding their pets as they would all go out of business, and their business is making money.

  • Karen Mitchell

    Hi. It’s great that you seen a change in them and took the initiative to carry out some research. Good on you.

    I am sincere in what I say and only want the best for your animals and their health.
    (I have been researching natural raw diet and commercial pet food for 6 years.
    May I suggest, do some research on natural raw feeding. The fist thing you will learn is that dogs are carnivore, which means they cannot survive on processed commercial pet foods.

    People who believe that their pet can survive on processed pet foods all their life – their pets look fine for the first half of their life, then things start to get noticed. Some people change the brand, only to find that in a matter of time, their pets condition starts to deteriorate again. I urge you to research a natural raw diet for your best friends and find some support to help with the transitions.

    Some people choose to do a mixed diet, which usually congaing raw meats, vegetables and some fruits as well as natural additives like coconut oil for instance and Turmeric. I see and hear of hundreds of people treating their dogs and cats cancer with Turmeric.
    I hear and read of success stories every day from people who have made the change. Do you know the number one cause of cancer and kidney failure in pets? Processed commercial food. Not to mention other diseases, skin problems and other health issues? Of course, conmmercial dog food manufacturers do not want pet owners to get educated and take charge of feeding their pets as they would all go out of business, and their business is making money.

  • Karen Mitchell

    What is TOTW???
    Ever wonder WHY they weren’t having any of it? To understand why we need to know how their stomach works and how and why it reacts with certain foods and when going from processed foods to natural foods will naturally have an impact on their system. Processed food are not good for any living being. If you think any different, you need to do some serious research.
    Feed your baby on nothing but processed foods up till they are 10 years old and then tell my their immune system is at 100%

  • Dori

    If you re-read my post of 7 months ago you will see that I stated that Nature’s Logic contains millet.

  • Gerry Ingram

    You are right. I should not have taken it so personal.

  • Gerry Ingram

    I think telling others their product choice is shoddy etc is not approaching things in a friendly manner.

    I did admit my mistakes I always do.

  • Gerry Ingram

    No it does not mean they are separate companies. It only means they are connected, that they have some sort of relationship.

  • Gerry Ingram

    Associated means there is a connection, a relationship. It means nothing else. That is like saying I am my fathers son but we are not related. TOTW does not = Diamond and Diamond does not equal TOTW. Diamond is much bigger than TOTW. You know a rose is a flower but not all flowers are roses.

    TOTW is not equal to any other brand Diamond sells. If it were, it would have the exact same track record which it does not.

  • theBCnut

    Yes, but if you repair your food handling equipment with duct tape and cardboard, which is what the Diamond plant in question did, you are far more than likely to have a problem. And if you put off announcing a recall until the FDA threatens to file a lawsuit, which is what Diamond did, you trash your reputation. And if you leave unmarked food in open bins, which is what Diamond did, oh never mind, enjoy your food…

  • Pitlove

    Hi Gerry-

    Glad you are having good luck with TotW. It’s a very popular food at the small pet store I work at. The ingredients are definitely good, which is why the formulas have earned between a 4-5 star rating.

    However, I’d really like to stress to you that, there are people who are interested in who manufactures the food they are feeding and if the company has had recalls, and many of them (like Diamond or P&G) and have not handled them well, they want to know this because it can make or break if they choose to feed the food or not. People come on here not only to learn about the ingredients in the food, but the company behind it.

    If you do not mind the Diamond recalls and are not worried they could at some point effect TotW and cause you to have to change foods, that is perfectly fine, but there is really no reason to become so overly defensive over the 7 month old post Dori made. These are truths about Diamond that are undeniable. And unfortunely their poor quality control practices ( see the FDA post on the visit to one of their plants for details) have the opportunity to trickle down to any of their brands at any time and some don’t want that worry in the back of their minds.

  • DogFoodie

    She actually said Nature’s Logic contains millet. Re-read her post.

    Don’t be so defensive. You picked your food. It’s your choice. It’s cool.

    Just admit (to yourself) that you were mistaken. You don’t have to defend your choice to anyone. You and your dogs are the only ones who have to live with it. But, being nasty to others about it all really isn’t necessary.

  • DogFoodie

    I hardly consider my post freaking out. A little dramatic much?

    Now, I’ll admit I do get a little crazy about my pollinator gardening. Everything I plant is beneficial to them. So yes, I do work hard to bring the bees to my yard.

  • aquariangt

    I did. Association would infer that they were two separate companies that had something to do with each other, for example, Solid Gold has about 1/2 their varieties manufactured by Diamond. Therefore, Solid Gold is associated with Diamond. Taste of the Wild is Diamond’s brand, it’s merely their higher quality one, but doesn’t change the fact that they are Diamond. I do not “Associate” Diamond and TotW as they are one and the same

  • Storm’s Mom

    Taste of the Wild is Diamond’s “house brand” if you will. It is a label created by Diamond, owned by Diamond, made by Diamond, distributed by Diamond, etc etc etc. Taste of the Wild=Diamond.

  • Gerry Ingram

    Not associated with, but it is a product of? Seriously did you say that?

  • Gerry Ingram

    I just do the best I can. Guilty by association doesn’t cut it for me.

  • aquariangt

    I’m not sure what you’re getting at here. Taste of the Wild is not “associated” with Diamond, it is a Diamond product. So even though TotW was recalled once, as long it’s still a Diamond product, it still is under the same scrutiny as the rest of their problems, of which they have many.

    I don’t know what you need expertise or experience for, luckily all this information is readily available, as recalls have to be announced, and the reasoning is easily found on the FDAs page. If you need links, hit up the recall section of this website and they have them in plenty. Again, maybe only one says Taste of the Wild, but they are still made by the same company in the same plants as the rest of their food

  • Gerry Ingram

    I have 5 dogs now 3-5-8-8-13 years old. All are healthy and doing great. One has allergies and I have tried a lot of different diets and other changes for him, but otherwise he is healthy. I have been feeding all of my dogs TOTW Wetlands since mid 2007.

    My eldest, a 13 year old poodle – 27 lbs, was brought to me because he was going to be euthanized on Monday. They brought me a can of Ole Roy, which I refused to even take home. Jonah was epileptic. He had had several grand mal seizures, spent days with the veterinarian to get through them. Make a long story short he was a mess and on numerous medications. I have taken him off all of them as his health has improved over the past four years. I feed him Taste of the Wild Wetlands and two pieces of science diet T/D twice a day. He also gets appropriate foods from my personal meals. I eat fairly well. Jonah has not had a seizure in the four years I have had him. In fact, he runs and plays with the other dogs as if he were a puppy.

    I made some comments below on this page and turns out I wasn’t so accurate. Still, I stand by this food. I do not believe it is appropriate to be derogatory about this product simply based on the fact that it is associated with Diamond. I am a retired dog trainer and I frequently recommend it among others to past clients. Only once have I heard of a dog having a difficult time with it. No food is perfect for every dog.

    I apologize for my inaccurate comments below. My personal experience has been very positive with this product.

  • Crazy4dogs

    It looks like she’s the one you originally replied to. Here’s the link:


    By the way, I would pick TOTW over Pedigree, as you did, and am glad you are helping those many dogs you have. I have several of my own and foster kill shelter dogs on a very regular basis. :)

  • Gerry Ingram

    I could not find it. This is a thread about TOTW. Point taken.

  • Crazy4dogs

    Just to set the record straight correctly, Dori said NATURE’S LOGIC contains MILLET, so it is technically not considered grain free, which is correct. That’s why it’s not listed on your bag of TOTW Wetlands. Millet is an ancient grain, but still a grain so Nature’s Logic is not grain free.

  • Gerry Ingram

    Your right it is your opinion. It is my opinion that making judgemental remarks about a product without sufficient evidence is disrespectful. Guilty by association is lame. Trying to make others feel poorly about a food they have chosen disrespectful. There is only one instance of verified problems with this specific food. The data does not support these kinds of comments.

    I am defending a product that has served me very well. I have five dogs, 3 – 6 – 8 – 8 – 13 years old, whose biggest issue has been fox tails. Although one of them has an allergy issue, I no longer believe it is diet related because I have tried numerous. He won’t even let me slip raw in. I’m not going to feed him hamburger and other muscle meets constantly.

    This should be a place where people offer their personal experiences or have sufficient evidence to back up a claim, but simply giving a bad rep to a product because of its association is not respectful.

    I will point out that Dori used the term shoddy almost right off the bat. Insulting anyone who currently uses it. You seem quite picky of your idea of respectful.

  • Crazy4dogs

    The point is you posted to a very old post and started ranting on others and with incorrect information.

    There were only 3 plants at the time of the recall and it significantly affected the Eastern half of the country. It was a very large recall with several months of production affected, not just one batch. This left may people with a poor impression of Diamond in general.

    That was in addition to the prior FDA warning letters to Diamond:


    I have enough expertise to research my comments or suggestions before I make them, if I am not already familiar or experienced in the matter. I have enough experience to not make prejudicial comments and random generalizations to start an argument on a post that is more than several months old.

  • jingermichels

    My advice to anyone wanting to change or improve the quality of the feed they’re giving to their pets is to join the preferred membership on this site and receive immediate updates regarding new product evaluation, changes to existing product reviews, notices of recalls , and most importantly the Monthly Top 5 foods. Start at the top tier feeds, read & evaluate, then go to online retailers to evaluate customer comments and suitability for your criteria….cost, known allergies (chicken, potatoes, etc.) or other health issues specific to your dog(s), etc.

  • Shawna

    You have every right to feed whatever you want without harsh judgement from others. Likewise, Dori has every right to be critical of any food she wants for any reason she wants without judgement.

    If you disagree with someone feel free to post a friendly rebuttal as to why that is. However if you want to be treated with respect then it would be wise to treat others with respect as well. Use of words like “lame” and “fanatics” is not probably a good way to go about it. Just my opinion though.

    For what it’s worth – I am primarily a raw feeder but due to finances I do feed my crew kibble as well. I used to feed TotW fairly regularly but now I only incorporate the brand into my rotation three or four times a year.

  • Gerry Ingram

    How does that change the point? 1 plant out of four that manufactures it. 1 from back east. Are you going to start correcting my spelling too?

    What experience or expertise do you claim to have?

  • Crazy4dogs
  • Gerry Ingram

    I did not say nor imply that it was not made anywhere else. I in fact said it was made in Missouri and that that was the recall location. Does it not go to show that obviously one plants QA is not the same as another plants QA?

    I think people come here for expert advice. What makes you the expert? I think testimonials of personal experience and the science evaluation above are what people come here for.

    I have five dogs on Taste of the wild. How many do you have and have you had any personal experience with TOTW?

    You expect better quality from Cadilac than from Chevrolet, but they are both manufactured by General Motors.

    I have a 13 year old poodle who I rescued at age 9. He was an epileptic who had had grand mal seizures for days at a time in his vets office. He was lethargic and just an emotional mess. He was eating canned Ole Roy. I went cold turkey to Taste of the wild. He has been seizure free since I have owned him. In fact we took him off Pheno Barbetol this year completely. He acts like a puppy. A completely different dog than the dog brought to me 4 years ago. I admit that his dog food is not the only life change he has been through, but with his past, he would have been a candidate for numerous things.

    Unless, you have specific information from an acreddited source to back up your claims. Your really not making a fair evaluation.

  • Crazy4dogs

    There are some companies that have been producing food for up to 100 years and have never had a recall.

    Schell & Kampeter, who own Diamond, has always owned Taste of the Wild.




    The recall may have only been once for Taste of the Wild but it was for a very long production time. FDA link:


    Edit: There are 4 total facilities for Diamond Pet Company. It doesn’t state that one is specifically for TOTW:


  • aquariangt

    This is a site for advice in dog food. Which people willingly come to for advice. Do people have the right to know in their quest for dog food knowledge about Diamond? Absolutely. I’m sorry that our ideals don’t line up, and you clearly aren’t interested in discussing it.
    Of note-even on the taste of the wild website, it links to diamond manufacturing, not it’s own. It even states it’s made in Missouri and South Carolina, two Diamond plants that have had many issues.

  • Gerry Ingram

    It is not okay to give others a hard time over their choices when you are not doing the best that you know you can.

    There are many times when manufaturing facilities have more problems than other facilities that make the very same product. That is why recalls typically state where that product was made.

    The one TOTW recall was from Missouri. There are two TOTW facilities in California. So, I have never had to be concerned about it. Things will happen in mass production. It happens with human grade food constantly. Many of us do the best we can.

    The more product one produces the more likely they are to encounter an issue. If I make 20 pies and you only make one, its more likely someone will get a bad pie from me than from you. Its just a numbers game.

  • aquariangt

    Bigotry? Wrong word there…

    I’d also like to point out that you came on and said you weren’t going to listen to a bunch of people who were raw feeders being upset. I’m telling you that’s not the case, as both people you responded to don’t feed raw. I’m not arguing it’s the best, but not right for me at this point, but I supplement plenty.

    That’s great you are a retired dog trainer, I’m a current one, and no majority of my people are positive here, I’m completely +R.

    Taste of the Wild looks good, but the fact that they are manufactured by Diamond, I don’t really care if TotW itself only has had one recall, the company itself is a problem, and there are better dry foods out there with a better track record, so why take the risk? It ABSOLUTELY reflects on everything they make, regardless of specific line recalls. I’m not going to tell you what to feed, but I will stand by my opinion on not feeding anything Diamond makes, too much variety out there to risk.

  • Gerry Ingram

    You wake up, RAW is not for everyone. I tried to go RAW and my dogs were not having any of it. So, I supplement their TOTW with cooked veggies and meats, including guts.

  • Gerry Ingram

    Did you just change food all at once? Not recommended. 10 days minimum with most any dog food change. TOTW is bit high on protein and that in and of itself can be a shock to the system.

  • Gerry Ingram

    Yet, TOTW has had only one.

  • Gerry Ingram

    So, what you are saying is that the two of you are not doing the very best you can for your own dogs, but feel obligatory to come on here and give others a hard time about their choices. Forgive me if I am wrong, but that sounds a bit bigotry to me.

    Feeding commercial dog food is a risk period. TOTW has had one recall. ONE! I am a retired dog trainer. One of the reasons I chose TOTW was because in a question asked amongst dog trainers, my circle is almost exclusively positive reinforcement based trainers and usually well informed, “what food do you feed if not RAW,” the two most popular answers were TOTW and Orijon. Orijon was by far the most. I trust that group of trainers. Just because Diamond has trouble with its other foods from time to time does not necessarily reflect upon a specific brand. Obviously since the record is not even close to being equal across the board.

    I don’t know if it was one of you two, mut someone also said TOTW contained Millot. Just to set that record straight. it is not listed on my bag of TOTW Wetlands.

  • aquariangt

    Just so you know, neither DogFoodie nor I are Raw feeder :)

  • Gerry Ingram

    I digress, It is what I was told before I switched from Pedigree. I see that is not true.
    Still, TOTW has had one recall in 2012. I am not going to freak out over a bunch of RAW food fanatics. If we freaked out over all the BS human food, we would have to grow our own and still the bees would bring monsonto into you back yard.

    If you want to freak out, freak out over Ole Roy and Beneful.

  • DogFoodie

    Taste of the Wild is, and always was, one of Diamond’s house brands.

  • Gerry Ingram

    Taste of the Wild was a separate entity from Diamond prior to being
    bought out. I have been using it for about 7-8 years, but only the Wetlands flavor. I know of only one recall on TOTW and it is
    my understanding it is made in a separate facility. Millet is not a listed ingredient on Wetlands TOTW.

  • Gerry Ingram

    I think it is pretty lame to just say a company is shoddy without backing it up.

  • Gerry Ingram

    Salt is a natural preservative. That is why it was so important in the past.

  • Gerry Ingram

    I worked in QC for 5 years.

  • Wendy

    great dry food for my dog https://youtu.be/Ecryd3RFw7A going to order some now hope this helps out

  • carla

    Yes I do. My Golden is 11 year old, and is very intolerant to cereals. I am using this brand (wet lands and pacific stream) and it’s going very fine.

  • jingermichels

    Before you feed this brand, you should research Diamond Pet Food recalls. Diamond manufactures pet foods for several brand names and does not have the best record from a quality control standpoint.