Sign in or Register
Search Forums
Recent Topics
-
Find Beautiful Girls from your city for night
by
Lauren
2 hours, 7 minutes ago -
Cane Corso lipomas
by
ste stef
1 week ago -
Ultimate Pet Nutrition Nutra Thrive
by
l m
2 weeks, 1 day ago -
Vet recommended âGastroentericâ kibble
by
michael s
2 weeks, 5 days ago -
Badlands Ranch Superfood Complete
by
l m
3 weeks, 2 days ago
Recent Replies
-
peter moor on New York Times Article
-
Sunny P on Where to buy bulk frozen meat for cheap?
-
Ahsan Bhatti on Chia Seed (Topic 2)
-
Robert Fine on When Co’s change recipes to dry dog food
-
Robert Fine on Music
-
Lia S on Need opinions please on Titan or Eureka Raw dog food?
-
Lia S on Treat reviews/ratings?
-
Ramesh Kumar on Stella and chewys wild red raw kibble or open farm raw mix?
-
ApolloCa on "Kahoots" brand foods
-
Ramesh Kumar on Sudden problem with Merrick Grain Free Dry
-
A on Cat Lane review
-
Ramesh Kumar on Ultimate Pet Nutrition Nutra Thrive
-
Naba Jacw on Benny Bullys Liver Treats
-
Ramesh Kumar on Pomeranian Food – Less protein?
-
Stephen Council on Blue Buffalo not good per vet
Hi Crazy4cats,
My understanding, at least in the state I reside in, is that chews do not have to comply with AAFCO labeling unless they also make a claim that could be considered a nutritional claim. This could be something like “easily digestible” or “source of protein”. I think it is up to the feed control official to decide if the product is making a nutritional claim. This could be why, in my opinion, there is no AAFCO definition for the term”rawhide”. I think, that without a definition, this opens the door for manufacturers to market their hide based products as “rawhide free” when making a nutritional claim
This isn’t to say though that a chew, such as rawhide, because it doesn’t have to meet AAFCO labeling is not regulated. Rawhide is considered “food” by the FDA and so it has to comply with the FD&C act of 1938 and can come under regulation if adulterated.
It seems to me that many are confused on this point, resulting in people reporting/saying that rawhide is not regulated and since it is not regulated ,it may be a source of significant levels of toxins. In actuality the risk is likely no different than other sources of pet food.. This misunderstanding, in my opinion, is then exploited and used to market “rawhide alternatives” , which in some cases appear to be made of the same tissue as rawhide, yet are being sold at a much higher price point . I think consumers are willing to pay this higher price because they think this product is “safe” and chews labeled as rawhide are not safe.
Sign in or Register
Search Forums
Recent Topics
-
Find Beautiful Girls from your city for night
by
Lauren
2 hours, 7 minutes ago -
Cane Corso lipomas
by
ste stef
1 week ago -
Ultimate Pet Nutrition Nutra Thrive
by
l m
2 weeks, 1 day ago -
Vet recommended âGastroentericâ kibble
by
michael s
2 weeks, 5 days ago -
Badlands Ranch Superfood Complete
by
l m
3 weeks, 2 days ago
Recent Replies
-
peter moor on New York Times Article
-
Sunny P on Where to buy bulk frozen meat for cheap?
-
Ahsan Bhatti on Chia Seed (Topic 2)
-
Robert Fine on When Co’s change recipes to dry dog food
-
Robert Fine on Music
-
Lia S on Need opinions please on Titan or Eureka Raw dog food?
-
Lia S on Treat reviews/ratings?
-
Ramesh Kumar on Stella and chewys wild red raw kibble or open farm raw mix?
-
ApolloCa on "Kahoots" brand foods
-
Ramesh Kumar on Sudden problem with Merrick Grain Free Dry
-
A on Cat Lane review
-
Ramesh Kumar on Ultimate Pet Nutrition Nutra Thrive
-
Naba Jacw on Benny Bullys Liver Treats
-
Ramesh Kumar on Pomeranian Food – Less protein?
-
Stephen Council on Blue Buffalo not good per vet