Dog Food Advisor › Forums › Canine Nutrition › Kirkland Canned vs 5-star Kibbles
-
AuthorPosts
-
Carl LMember
Hi all, I posted this in the Editor’s Choice forum as well, but realized it applies to any 5-star kibble:
We have a new dog (1 1/2 year Lab) and need to settle on a quality commercial food. Commercial raw and 5-star canned food is out of our price range. Most kibble is not.
I have been reading in many places that aside from cost and convenience, all things being equal, a quality canned food is probably slightly better for a dog than a quality kibble.
In Canada, there are not many 5-star canned foods in our range. Kirkland Cuts in Gravy is one. We can feed our 60 lb. Lab for under $100.
My question is, aside from convenience (not an issue in our case), does it make sense to go exclusive Kirkland canned versus a 5-star kibble since it is in our price range? What are the points against feeding this particular canned vs. any 5-star kibble? (We are leading towards Acana Regionals).
Of course we can go kibble and canned combined, but aside from price, I am not sure why we would do it?
Anyone willing to offer opinions?
Thanks in advance -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.