Hill’s Science Diet Healthy Advantage (Dry)

Share

Rating: ★★☆☆☆

Hill’s Science Diet Healthy Advantage dry dog food receives the Advisor’s below-average rating of 2 stars.

The Hill’s Science Diet Healthy Advantage product line lists three dry dog foods.

Although each formulation appears to be designed for a specific life stage, we found no AAFCO nutritional adequacy statements for these dog foods on the Science Diet website.

The following is a list of recipes available at the time of this review.

  • Hill’s Science Diet Healthy Advantage Puppy
  • Hill’s Science Diet Healthy Advantage Canine Adult
  • Hill’s Science Diet Healthy Advantage Large Breed Puppy

Hill’s Science Diet Healthy Advantage Large Breed Puppy was selected to represent the others in the line for this review.

Hill's Science Diet Healthy Advantage Large Breed Puppy

Dry Dog Food

Estimated Dry Matter Nutrient Content

Protein = 31% | Fat = 17% | Carbs = 44%

Ingredients: Whole grain corn, chicken by-product meal, corn gluten meal, liver flavor, dried beet pulp, flaxseed, dried egg product, soybean oil, animal fat (preserved with mixed tocopherols and citric acid), fish oil, lactic acid, potassium citrate, iodized salt, choline chloride, dl-methionine, natural flavor, dicalcium phosphate, vitamins (l-ascorbyl-2-polyphosphate (source of vitamin C), vitamin E supplement, niacin, thiamine mononitrate, vitamin A supplement, calcium pantothenate, biotin, vitamin B12 supplement, pyridoxine hydrochloride, riboflavin, folic acid, vitamin D3 supplement), vitamin E supplement, l-lysine, minerals (manganese sulfate, ferrous sulfate, zinc oxide, copper sulfate, calcium iodate, sodium selenite), l-tryptophan, taurine, preserved with mixed tocopherols and citric acid, l-carnitine, phosphoric acid, beta-carotene, rosemary extract

Fiber (estimated dry matter content) = 2.3%

Red items when present indicate controversial ingredients

Estimated Nutrient Content
MethodProteinFatCarbs
Guaranteed Analysis31%17%NA
Dry Matter Basis31%17%44%
Calorie Weighted Basis27%36%38%

The first ingredient in this dog food is corn. Corn is an inexpensive and controversial cereal grain of only modest nutritional value to a dog.

What’s more, corn is commonly linked to canine food allergies1.

For these reasons, we do not consider corn a preferred component in any dog food.

The second item is chicken by-product meal… a dry rendered product of slaughterhouse waste. It’s made from what’s left of a slaughtered chicken after all the prime cuts have been removed.

In a nutshell, chicken by-products are those unsavory leftovers usually considered “unfit for human consumption”.

In addition to organs (the nourishing part), this stuff can contain almost anything… feet, beaks, undeveloped eggs… anything (that is) except skeletal muscle (real meat).

On the brighter side, by-product meals are meat concentrates and contain nearly 300% more protein than fresh chicken.

The third ingredient is corn gluten meal. Gluten is the rubbery residue remaining once corn has had most of its starchy carbohydrate washed out of it.

Compared to meat, glutens are inferior grain-based proteins lower in many of the essential amino acids dogs need for life.

This inexpensive plant-based ingredient can significantly boost the total protein content reported in this dog food.

After the liver flavor, we find dried beet pulp. Beet pulp is a controversial ingredient… a high fiber by-product of sugar beet processing.

Some denounce beet pulp as an inexpensive filler while others cite its outstanding intestinal health and blood sugar benefits.

We only call your attention here to the controversy and believe the inclusion of beet pulp in reasonable amounts in most dog foods is entirely acceptable.

The sixth ingredient is flaxseed… one of the best plant sources of healthy omega-3 fatty acids. Provided they’ve first been ground into a meal, flax seeds are also rich in soluble fiber.

The seventh ingredient is dried egg product… a dehydrated form of shell-free eggs. Quality can vary significantly. Lower grade egg product can even come from commercial hatcheries… from eggs that have failed to hatch.

In any case, eggs are easy to digest and have an exceptionally high biological value.

The eighth item is soybean oil… red flagged here only due to its rumored (yet unlikely) link to canine food allergies.

However, since soybean oil is high in omega-6 fatty acids and contains no omega-3′s, it’s considered less nutritious than canola or flaxseed oils.

The ninth item is animal fat. Animal fat is a generic by-product of rendering… the same high-temperature process used to make meat meals.

Since there’s no mention of a specific animal, this item could come from almost anywhere… restaurant grease, slaughterhouse waste, diseased cattle… even euthanized pets.

We do not consider generic animal fat a quality ingredient.

From here, the list goes on to include a number of other items.

But to be realistic, ingredients located this far down the list (other than nutritional supplements) are not likely to affect the overall rating of this product.

With two notable exceptions

First, we find no mention of probiotics… friendly bacteria applied to the surface of the kibble after processing.

And lastly, the minerals listed here do not appear to be chelated. And that can make them more difficult to absorb. Non-chelated minerals are usually associated with lower quality dog foods.

Hill’s Science Diet Healthy Advantage Dog Food
The Bottom Line

Judging by its ingredients alone, Hill’s Science Diet Healthy Advantage Dog Food looks to be a below-average kibble.

But ingredient quality by itself cannot tell the whole story. We still need to estimate the product’s meat content before determining a final rating.

The dashboard displays a dry matter protein reading of 31%, a fat level of 17% and estimated carbohydrates of about 44%.

As a group, the brand features an average protein content of 29% and a mean fat level of 18%. Together, these figures suggest a carbohydrate content of 45% for the overall product line.

Average protein. Near-average fat. And below-average carbs when compared to a typical dry dog food.

In addition, when you consider the protein-boosting effect of the corn gluten meal, this looks like the profile of a kibble containing a moderate amount of meat.

Bottom line?

Hill’s Science Diet Healthy Advantage is a corn-based dry dog food using a moderate amount of chicken by-product meal as its main source of animal protein… thus earning the brand 2 stars.

Not recommended.

A Final Word

This review is designed to help you make a more informed decision when buying dog food. However, our rating system is not intended to suggest feeding a particular product will result in specific health benefits for your pet.

For a better understanding of how we analyzed this product, please be sure to read our article, “The Problem with Dog Food Reviews

Remember, no dog food can possibly be appropriate for every life stage, lifestyle or health condition. So, choose wisely. And when in doubt consult a veterinarian for help.

Have an opinion about this dog food… or maybe the review itself? Please know… we welcome your comments.

Notes and Updates

04/26/2011 Original review
04/26/2011 Last Update

  1. White, S., “Update on food allergy in the dog and cat”, World Small Animal Veterinary Association, Vancouver, 2001
Dog Food Advisor IconThe Dog Food Advisor publishes independent reviews to help pet owners make better choices when shopping for dog food.


  • beccadog

     Buy and read:

    Dr. Pitcairn’s New Complete Guide to Natural Health for Dogs and Cats
    by Richard H. Pitcairn and Susan Hubble Pitcairn
    (Paperback - Aug 11, 2005)

    My animals over the years did well when I made my own pet food. This is not the same as leftovers, because pets need certain nutrients than human leftovers do not have. 

    Also, read my other post about genetically modified organims (GMO’s) which can damage organs in people and other animals, increase allergens and create new toxins in food previously safe. My last dog developed a bleeding stomach from what I thought was an organic pet food.  The pet food came from China where there are no regulations and contained glass! My vet told me to trash the entire bag and never to feed it to her or any animal again.

    She refused most pet foods, even those which she had eaten before.  Wildlife, BTW, refuse to eat GMO contained crops and feed.  Perhaps, our pets are not so far removed from their wild cousins.

    I’ve found that by making my own pet food using books like Dr. Pitcarin, but from organically grown ingredients and wild sockeye salmon makes for nutrritious, well balanced food that both animals and people thrive on.  And, unlike the cheaper farm raised fish, there are less health damaging effects from wild salmon –just don’t over feed salmon because everything on the planet has been contaminated with dioxin and PCBs (compliments of Monsanto).

  • beccadog

    Aimee, This is good information, most of which I’ve read elsewhere in natural cook books for making one’s own pet food.

    I made my own pet food following the recommendations of veterinarian, .Richard H. Pitcairn D.V.M. 
    Dr. Pitcairn’s Complete Guide to Natural Health for Dogs & Cats. 
    This was before pet food became the first target for genetically modified organisms that enable the crop with resist vast amounts of herbicides and/or  become an insecticide in the gut of the animal and person who eats it.

    Now all commercial pet food and 80% of human processed foods have been altered to sell more herbicides. These altered substances called food increase the risk of allergies–some fatal; create new toxins to food previously safe to eat; new diseases and cancers, and more dangers.  The intense use of pest controls IS curruently poisoning rainwater, surface and groundwaters wherever the crops are factory grown in monocultures.

    Making your own pet food is a good idea, providing you can grow your own ingredients or purchase organic.  Some people purchase wild sock-eye salmon which is high in omega 3 fatty acids UNLIKE farm eraised salmon, which is high in omega 6 and causes cancer.

    Dogs and cats do well on wild salmon and homemade pet foods..Thus far, wild salmon is not yet genetically engineered. But, that can change based on the conflicts of interest at the FDA.

  • JStrider

    Thank you, Aimee.

  • aimee

    Sorry to hear about your dog. I don’t think there is one best diet for all dogs with kidney failure as the needs of one dog may differ from another.

    The best diet is likely a homecooked diet formulated by a veterinary nutritionist specific for your dog. In lieu of that, it is the thereupeutic diet your dog does best on.  

    Kidney diets have lowered phosphorous, higher omega 3, higher water soluble vitamins, buffering agents, and strive for a protein level that will meet needs without protein being used for energy. They are also usually higher in fat.    

  • JStrider

    I apologize. I feed him Purina Veterinary Diets NF. At the time we started him on this, I felt it was the lesser of two evils. I won’t feed my dogs Science Diet and never thought I would feed any of our dogs a Purina product.

  • Jstrider

    What is the best food to give to dogs with chronic kidney failure?I hate Hill’s Kidney Diet but don’t know what else to feed him. Also we feed our other dogs California Natural Chicken Meal and Rice Formula. Any input, people?

  • melissa

     Hi Guest-

    First, I think its wonderful that you have worked for a vet clinic for “several” years, and apparently feel that makes your opinion worth more than any other opinion here. If time worked in a vet hospital dictates knowledge, than I win, with 10 yrs plus at a vet hospital, lol. Oh, and I do not feed Science Diet, unless there is a medical reason, Hills/Science Diet does not enter into my home, and then only until I can find a substitute.

    Mike stated that there was no AAFCO statement on the website at the time of the review-never did he, nor does he state that there is no AAFCO statement “period”. Most companies/stores will guarantee the food-if your pet will not eat it, return it to the place of purchase. Nothing special about that statement.

    Please show us where “all life stages” equals puppies only. It simple means that it has ‘enough” for puppies to support growth etc. You are, imo, spouting opinion as fact with several statements. I own senior dogs, young dogs and middle age dogs-all eat “ALS” and not a single one of them is fat, or suffering from any  disorder you list. All dogs are different and while one senior dog may be a lethargic couch potato, not all of them are. A senior can get obese on any food, including the “senior” foods out there(which, fyi, please show me a link to the AAFCO standard and classification for “senior” and what dictates that a food is a “senior” product meeting the needs of seniors only. Most carry a statement of “adult maintenance”.)

    In closing, all are entitled to their opinions, and while I happen to not have a problem with some corn in the diet, I do have a problem with corn being the number one ingredient in a dog food. And please, before you decide to slam Mike for his reviews, learn how to properly spell and drop the profanity-it will make you seem much more intelligent and give some credibility to your rant. Now I am off to “educate”, not edjucate myself by reading more of Mike’s articles, not “artical’

  • Noahsark

    I am glad you saw that–and when I looked up BILJAC it say’s they like it but it is not recommeneded..I am so confused !! they are all bad give them table food oh wait that is bad to (pink slime) government we need label’s with pictures of where our food comes from and the whole story about the company I know we would not want to eat anything then…even vegetable’s are bad because the extremely harsh bug chemical’s !! (not just meat is bad) everything is :(

  • Jennifer Hahn

    My dog lab/chow mix had been eating science diet for i don’t know how long now and I recently started noticing her have blood in her stool. Now my mother’s dog who has been eating the same thing has blood in his stool. They were throwing up and originally I thought it was from eating grass or something and now to find out all of this information about the food after the fact I feel very deceived. I paid more for my dogs to eat healthier and now to find out it has been making them sick and possibly did further damage internally really just makes me outraged! I am going to have to take my pets to the vet and spend money I don’t have for things I shouldn’t have to be worrying about because I thought I was getting the good stuff for my dogs. I was basically just feeding them poison and science diet just tricked us all. I think there needs to be compensation for all the pets who have suffered because of this recall!!!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/Toxed2loss Toxed2loss

    Thanks Rich, were you aware that ‘powdered celluose’ is usually saw dust, or the equivalent…? Rice, wheat and corn being second, third and fourth are very unsettling. They cause huge problems! Jump over to DogtorJ.com and read his reports on the wheat corn barly, etc. if you research ‘chicken-by-product meal on the web, you’ll be appalled. I can see why it got 2 stars!

  • Rich

    Just wanted to share that the ingredients listed on “Hill’s Science Diet Healthy Advantage Adult” (product 7590) are significantly different than those listed above for the puppy food. In particular, there is no mention of corn until the fourth ingredient. The first five ingredients listed are Chicken By-Product Meal, Brewer’s Rice, Whole Grain Wheat, Whole Grain Corn, and Powdered Cellulose.

  • Michelle

    Carrie, AAFCO is a joke. Ol’roy meets their standards. So what! I wouldn’t feed that crap to my dogs, but at least it’s cheap. People pay a lot of money for this Hill’s crap. http://www.dogfoodadvisor.com/dog-food-reviews/ol-roy-dog-food-dry/

  • http://DogFoodAdvisor.com Mike Sagman

    Carrie… Are you kidding me? Do you truly believe one must be a “veterinary nutritionist” to assess the content or nutritional value of a dog food?

    How much time have you actually spent on this website? How could you possibly have missed the numerous references to AAFCO? Every one of the 500+ reports on this site mentions AAFCO and links directly to an explanation of these standards within the opening paragraphs of each review.

    When you order others to “educate yourselves”, you may wish to heed your own advice. For your scientifically inaccurate and medically outdated explanation of protein and its relationship to kidney function did not go unnoticed.

    In an article entitled, “Mythology of Protein Restriction for Dogs with Reduced Renal Function” written by Dr. Kenneth C. Bovée (DVM, MMedSc) professor of Clinical Studies at the University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine and published in the Compendium on Continuing Education for the Practicing Veterinarian (1998), the author states:

    “The continued use of protein restriction in the absence of scientific evidence deserves thoughtful consideration. I would suggest that the dogma and mythology of a possible benefit are so embedded in the thought process of veterinarians and owners that these cannot be easily dislodged despite the scientific evidence. I would refer to this as the myth of dietary protein and characterize it as a negative myth.”

    Please be sure to check out that article. And of course, the numerous references Dr. Bovee uses to support his position.

    Carrie… you said:

    “The manufacturers who produce Veterinary lines of food (Hill’s, Royal Canin, & Purina) are the ones doing the research. They come to the Veterinarians and educate them on the TRULY important and nutritious factors in pet food. The Vets are NOT getting kickbacks! If your Vet is recommending a product to you it’s because they believe in the science behind it.”

    How naive.

    Like some physicians who routinely receive much of their drug prescribing information from the pharmaceutical industry, many veterinarians get a significant amount of their own pet food education directly from pet food manufacturers themselves.

    And much of that that information can be notably biased and scientifically flawed.

    For proof, I refer you to this recent comment posted on our review of Hill’s Prescription Diet I/D Canine formula by a practicing veterinarian…

    Hi Mike,

    I am a veterinarian. Though I see that you are not, I share your views regarding the low quality ingredients in Hills’ foods. This was not always the case. Once upon a time, they were a great, much smaller company. However, in veterinary school most of our nutrition education comes from these big companies who “brainwash” us and schmooze us by offering free food for reading their “educational material” and taking quizzes. I think what you have done here is a good thing in trying to make people more aware of these ingredients. I personally try not to recommend any food that I would not feed to my own pets and this includes all of Hill’s diets and most of the other highly commercialized brands. Most holistic veterinarians have taken extra time to become more knowledgeably about food since what an animal eats can have a tremendous impact on their health, much the same as humans.

    Elisa Katz, DVM

    Carrie… Since it’s obviously your opinion that only a veterinary nutritionist could have the knowledge needed to judge the quality of a dog food product, don’t forget to check with your family physician before you buy your next box of corn flakes. After all, he went to school to be able to do that. Right?

  • Gordon

    “They come to the Veterinarians and educate them on the TRULY important and nutritious factors in pet food.”

    What a load of the biggest nonsense I’ve read all week! Carrie, who are you? The billions of dollars the pet food industry including the veterinary lines of brands, is one of the biggest scams in the history of capitalism!

  • Gordon

    Carrie – Listening to brainwashed vets is a sure fire way of committing your pets to a life time of more vet visits. Scientific studies that contravene the laws of Nature is beyond all imaginable belief! Grain riddled high useless carb diets are amongst the worst imaginable long term diets for dogs and cats.

    Do not listen to your conventional vet in anyway shape or form re nutrition. They’re good for surgery and emergency medicine, which may including prescription pet foods for short term use until research is done by the client to use Nature as a prescription. Not for nutrition. If they were, they would be recommending not wasting your money on Hills, Purina, and the like, and buy raw meaty bones and carcasses from butchers, and meat places. They would be listening to vets like Dr. Lonsdale and Dr. Billinghurst and other pro-Nature vets.

    Dogs and cats require high protein, low fat and next to no carbs for a sustainable and thriving long and happy life! No pet food conglomerate funded study (In the name of making money) can dispute the laws of Nature. Not one, ever!!!!!!!!

    Dogs require a rich diet in meat and protein with essential amino acids and not carcinogenic cooked corn and other grain riddled poisonous kibbles. Yes I am a self appointed veterinary nutritionist for my dogs, and there’s not a damn thing you can do about that!!!!!

    Have a nice day. :)

  • Carrie

    Are any of you Veterinary Nutritionists? Or have you just learned by reading labels? (Which are all marketing.) Or learned by listening/reading what any person with a computer can say, without any knowledge, just their opinion, or regard to the health of the animal?

    The nutrients that come from the ingredients are FAR more important than the ingredients themselves. I don’t want to get into a war of words on here, but… LISTEN TO YOUR VETERINARIAN!!! They spend every waking moment of their lives working on your 4-legged family members. The manufacturers who produce Veterinary lines of food (Hill’s, Royal Canin, & Purina) are the ones doing the research. They come to the Veterinarians and educate them on the TRULY important and nutritious factors in pet food. The Vets are NOT getting kickbacks! If your Vet is recommending a product to you it’s because they believe in the science behind it.

    Do any of you know the importance of the AAFCO statement? There are 2 important statements to look for. 1. Is the food “formulated” or “animal feed tested”, and 2. is it for “all life stages” or for a “specific life stage.”

    1. If a food is formulated, then a computer calculated the minimum necessary ingredients needed to make up that diet. If it was animal feed tested, the company spent hundreds of thousands to a million dollars feeding the new diet, for a minimum of 6 months to a year, and conducting blood work and examinations on actual live animals to make sure the nutrients are bioavailable. Just cause it’s in there does not mean that it can be absorbed properly. With the minimum requirements you could use shoe leather and motor oil and call it nutritious!
    2. All life stages vs. specific life stages. What needs more protein, a baby or a senior? Why would you feed them the same way? A puppy or kitten needs more protein and calcium (just to name 2) than an adult or a senior pet needs. What does the body do with excess protein? It is processed through the kidneys and urinated out. So, any extra protein is peed out (waste of money) AND you are putting undue stress on the kidneys by feeding all this extra protein! DO NOT FEED DIETS THAT ARE MEANT FOR ALL LIFE STAGES! Read the bags! ALL maintenance foods (not prescription) MUST have an AAFCO statement if it is in fact a food. If it doesn’t have an AAFCO statement then the minimum ingredients (no matter how pure they are) are not enough to sustain your pets life.

    Remember that ALL manufacturers want to SELL their product. They spend millions on marketing! The color of the bag, the font, pictures, the cute puppy, etc. is all meant to sell their product! Just cause the picture on the bag is a boneless, skinless chicken breast does NOT mean that is what was used in the food. Educate yourselves!!!

  • melissa

    Richard-

    I have to disagree with a few things 1) Dogs lived longer-How do we know this? Ancedotal evidence? People saying “they remember” or “as a kid”? Since back then dogs had very little vet care, I would say that there is very little evidence beyond someone stating “as a kid”..And as we all know, the human memory tends to sugar coat things or recall them inaccurately-A child’s perspective is not necessairly reality. : ) And if you asked my Grandfather how he got to school, he would tell you how lucky the kids today have it taking a bus…because he “walked to school, barefoot and uphill-both ways” lol// Given that we know the longest life span of a grey wolf in captivity(with benefit of vet care and proper consistant diet) only lived to be 20, and the typical average is 13-15yrs in captivity(with benefit of vet care and proper consistant diet), and that is about equal to today’s domestic dog, (fed as owners see fit, and I am guessing there are more “baseline” kibble feeders than 5 star or raw etc) I fail to see the arguement that dogs need to be fed as their ancestors in order to achieve the average lifespan. I could easily say that my dogs are all achieving greater lifespans than of their ancestors based on being fed foods that are grain inclusive, and therefore feeding as the ancestors would seem to provide a shorter lifespan. This would be true of my particular dogs, not taking anything else such as environment, genetics etc into play : )

    Beef-Many dogs do have beef allergies, but I disagree that beef would have been the primary food source-Most places did not have leash laws back then, and as I recall beef was a very **rare and valuable** source of meat protein. It would seem that the dogs would have more likely eaten wild game that they caught or found or eaten scraps, no matter what they were. Dogs who made a habit of killing farm animals would have been shot. Therefore I would argue that the natural diets/sources of proteins would have been deer, squirrel rabbit etc. I don’t know how many here would remember, but when canned foods really “came on the scene” one of the biggest “sellers” was not beef or “high value” meat sources but rather “horse meat”. And as a result of less vet care and running loose, would have had lower survival times than today’s “housepet”, rather than longer lives.

  • http://brotherscomplete.com Richard Darlington

    L
    Does anyone else find it unusual that the “domestic” dog:

    * Who evolved about 4 million yrs. ago from 36 to 42 chromosome CARNIVORES into 78 chromosome CARNIVORES TOGETHER WITH the Gray wolf, Dingo, Coyote, African wild dog, Dhole, and a fox…

    * Who can interbreed with all of those 78 chromosome CARNIVORES that evolved at the same time, and their progeny can interbreed…

    * Who is closely related (99.8% identical Mitochondrial DNA) to a gray wolf and it is the Mitochondrial DNA that regulates cellular energy transfer and metabolism systems…

    * Who has only been “domesticated” for about 15,000 years which is an “eyeblink” in time where evolution is concerned.

    * Who have had their appearance, size and behavior patterns changed by man’s manipulation of their Nuclear DNA which is easily altered since each parent contributes one half the necessary chromosomes…but whose energy systems have remained 99.8% identical to the Gray Wolf because that is determined by the Mitochondrial DNA which is extremely stable over millions of years because it is passed on by the female only…

    * Who used to live much longer lives before humans started feeding them large quantities of grain after the war because grain silos all over the country were full and some genius figured out how to make use of them….

    * Who, while they could be described as omnivorous with a strong carnivorous bias, are still genetically primarily a CARNIVORE despite their willingness to eat grain that has been disguised as meat with meat flavors…

    * Who have flourished in almost all cases when given primarily a meat based diet…

    * Who have their PRIMARY allergy to..of all things….beef????

    So these primarily and substantially CARNIVOROUS animals are apparently allergic to their primary food source…meat..or “Beef”????

    I just want to know if there are other people out there that, using even a modicum of common sense, think this makes ANY sense at all?

    Have we turned over our minds to the marketing companies for these large multi-billion dollar mega companies to the point where it actually sounds half believable when someone tells you your primarily CARNIVOROUS (slightly omnivorous) pet will do better on corn than on beef?

    How has an animal that is primarily a CARNIVORE managed to become primarily allergic to its primary food supply?

    This country used to be about substance but now it seems that “perception” or an illusion created by marketing is more important than real content. I suggest you do a test – feed your dog meat for three months then feed them corn (or any mixture of grains) for 3 months (but you will need to flavor the grain to create the illusion for your dog that it is actually meat to get them to eat it) and let us know what your dog thinks about the “illusion” of “corn for carnivores”.

    Ok I admit that I may have gotten a bit carried away about this but I stay under control most of the time so give me a little slack here. his is about the health and wellbeing of your pet – the pet who relies on your for more than some flavored “illusion”. OK I’m done for a month or so.

  • http://DogFoodAdvisor.com Mike Sagman

    L… You said, “The top three food allergens for dogs are beef, dairy, and wheat. Corn is rarely ever linked to a food allergy.” Please post a link to a peer-reviewed scientific study proving your claim. In the meantime, I’ve already done my own research and suggest you read my article, “The Truth About Corn in Dog Food“.

  • L

    The top three food allergens for dogs are beef, dairy, and wheat. Corn is rarely ever linked to a food allergy. check your research

  • melissa

    Catey-

    SD puts “more vitamins and minerals” than other brands? Dogs only require so many, and all foods have to put the minimum required to ensure its complete and balanced. Some vitamins can be toxic in too high a quantity, so that comment would not impress me much.

    Everyone has their own opinion on corn. For me, I have no problem with some corn in the diet, and I do believe some dogs seem to do better with it. But thats me. However, I do not think all corns are equal and companies, so while I accept the corn from one does not mean I would trust the corn content of another.

  • Captain America

    Catey,

    I found this site set up pretty good. FYI to find a list of all dog foods fit for all life stages click on Articles at the top left, then scroll down & look for Tag Cloud, click on it, then you should see ALL LIFE STAGES that you click on to get the long list of all life stage dog foods. Hope this helps.

    CJ

  • Catey

    I get this for my senior dog. I pay $31 for 15lbs. the pieces are huge. I’ve never liked science diet because of the ingredients, don’t like feeding my dog corn products. My vet said that corn products arn’t as bad as people think and that science diet puts more vitamins and minerals than other brands and they give vets more information about thier foods than other Brands. But even though I adore my pets vet, I still feel weary about buying it.
    we adopted a puppy from the humane society acouple months ago, they gave us a bagof science diet puppychow , he absolutly refused to eat it. But he’ll eat my senior dogs Healthy advantage. My mom feeds her dogs Iams and TOTW. I hate Iams, heard horrible things about thier testing practices. I’d love to get both my dogs on the same food. My senior is 10 1/2 and my puppy i adopted is about 7 1/2 months (or so we think, he was taken to Humane society as a stray). What brands offer foods for all life stages? I stopped at a natural pet food store today and got acouple sample bags of TOTW and Precise, had my two little boys with so couldn’t as the shop keeper the questions i wanted about the food he had in the store. found this website when looking up reviews on the samples I got. I really like what i’m hearing about TOTW everysite I’ve been too, but it’s sooo expensive. Can any of you recommend any all life stages brands??? thank you!!!

  • http://www.drianbillinghurst.com Gordon

    Pat Moore – Not everyone posting comments here take Mike’s reviews and red flags as gospel. It is a website of wealth in information in the right steps toward better canine health through nutrition. You too, could create your own review type website and choose to red flag what you want. No one claims this site as gospel, but it does contain a host of informative articles.

    You have a right to question any red flags stating the reasoning behind your questioning. It’s a forum for all to state their opinions, post questions and hopefully take some worthwhile information away and applying same to improve your dog’s well being.

    I for example, don’t believe that garlic should be red flagged at all. But I understand the reasoning behind Mike’s decision to red flag it. I wouldn’t though, but then this isn’t my website.

    Get the picture? Just discuss what red flags you don’t agree with and why?

    Anyway, I’m off, as my boring non-event surveillance shift is over this morning.

  • Pat Moore

    Whose “red flags,” Jonathan? Yours and Dr. Sagman’s red flags. Everyone on this site has adopted Dr. Sagman’s star system and red flags as gospel. Get a life, people. Hill’s has VETERINARY NUTRITIONISTS on their staff. Not dentists. Not pet food store workers. You are so tunnel-visioned. People like Bow and others will never take you seriously but have fun anyway.

  • Jonathan

    Yeah, Mike P, that’s a good rule of thumb. I personaly look at it as “up to the fat”. All the ingredients up to and including the fat make up the vast bulk of the food. So looking at it like that, this food has 9 ingredients up to and including the listed fat, and of those 9 ingredients, 6 of them are red-flags.

  • Mike P

    The rule of thumb is always check out the first five ingredients of a dog food . This food has four ” red flag ” items in the first five .

  • Jonathan

    “their kibble is designed by SCIENTISTS!”

    So? since when are scientists infallible? Further more, what other “foods” has science given us? High-fructose corn syrup and aspartame come to mind… I try to avoid “foods” that required SCIENTISTS to make. Has food come to this? we can’t just trust real ingredients? I am aware of how nice Hill’s facility is. And how well their dogs and cats are kept. None of that changes the fact that these ingredients are remarkably low quality. Three of the main ingredients in this food are leftovers of other industries. I assure you that, no matter what they tell you, Hill’s does not use corn gluten meal, chicken by-products, and corn because these are some how great for dogs. Even excusing the chicken by-products (the only actual meat in this food), the corn gluten meal is a plant-based protein filler, and the “whole grain” corn (which cracks me up) is a carb filler and binder for the kibble with low nutritional value.

  • Bow

    I’m sorry, but I believe that some of you are mistaken. Hill’s is a fantastic company. They have amazing conditions in which their product is made, the animals that test their diet live a luxurious life, and their kibble is designed by SCIENTISTS! [not made from chemicals as someone claimed above...] You all should actually do your homework and realize that the contents of this product are actually not bad. There are many other diets that are WAY worse for your furry friends, but that is what you purchase because someone told you that chicken and corn are bad? Whoever can buy a bag of dog food in 2011 for $20 and claim that it is a good choice for their pet is sadly mistaken… it would be like if we ate at the china buffet every day for every meal… Gross! Do your homework before you comment next time, you will sound way less uneducated. GO HILL’S!

  • Tina

    I think it is crazy that my vet is pushing this food on me to buy do they get a share or some perk fir selling expensive crap food. My Vet advised me that my puppy has high potassium and enemia due to her poor diet and switching her to hills would fix the problems. I am seriously considering a new vet. I purchased President’s choice extra meaty puppy food after readign the ingredients at least the first ingredient is Chicken! I am still researching the best food but is a tedious process.

  • Gordon

    The thing is, these marketing giants have so much money to throw around in convincing many pet owners that the dearer the product, the better it is, and unfortunately succeed in this agenda, and then that profit goes into more marketing and the cycle continues. Not to mention that they have most Vets under their deceptive spell.

    I’m sick of the BS!

  • Jonathan

    Exactly. If Science Diet was $20 bucks, I wouldn’t be nearly as offended by the product. Sportmix is about as good as most Science Diet products, and it’s $14 for 40 pounds.

  • Melissa

    What I find insulting about alot of these foods is the price that is charged. Many people figure if its expensive, its got to be good. I have no problem paying for a quality product, I do have a poblem watching people pay top $$ for these types of foods.

  • Mike P

    It’s a shame when people think they are doing the right thing by feeding this stuff, because their vet told them to .

  • Jonathan

    HAHAHA! yeah, this is a hot pile of trash. And what “advantage” does the name imply this food to have? lol

  • erin c.

    EEWW! What kind of “science” is Hill’s Science using?
    Maybe the term “science” means lots of chemicals = food. Soylent Green comes to mind.