Brothers Complete Grain Free (Dry)

Share

Rating: ★★★★★

Brothers Complete Grain Free Dog Food receives the Advisor’s top rating of 5 stars.

The Brothers Complete Grain Free Dog Food product line includes three kibbles, each claimed to meet AAFCO nutrient profiles for all life stages.

The following is a list of recipes available at the time of this review.

  • Brothers Complete Grain Free with Fish Protein
  • Brothers Complete Grain Free with Red Meat Protein
  • Brothers Complete Grain Free with White Meat Protein

Brothers Complete Grain Free with White Meat Protein dog food was selected to represent the others in the line for this review.

Brothers Complete Grain Free with White Meat Protein

Dry Dog Food

Estimated Dry Matter Nutrient Content

Protein = 40% | Fat = 16% | Carbs = 36%

Ingredients: Chicken meal, tapioca, turkey meal, dried eggs, sweet potato, peas, chicken fat (preserved with mixed tocopherols, a source of vitamin E), dried chicken liver, pumpkin, flaxseed, alfalfa meal, carrots, potassium chloride, salt, choline chloride, blueberries, cranberries, apples, celery, beets, parsley, lettuce, spinach, dl-methionine, l-lysine, taurine, mixed tocopherols, rosemary extract, lecithin, vitamin A supplement, vitamin D3 supplement, vitamin E supplement, zinc sulfate, ferrous sulfate, niacin, folic acid, biotin, manganese sulfate, copper sulfate, calcium pantothenate, thiamine mononitrate, pyridoxine hydrochloride, riboflavin, l-ascorbyl 2-polyphosphate (source of vitamin C activity), zinc proteinate, manganese proteinate, copper proteinate, calcium iodate, sodium selenite, cobalt carbonate, vitamin B12 supplement, fructooligosaccharide, dried Enterococcus faecium fermentation product, dried Lactobacillus acidophilus fermentation product, dried Lactobacillus casei fermentation product, amylase (Aspergillus oryzae), protease (Aspergillus oryzae), cellulase (Trichoderma reesei), lactase (Aspergillus oryzae), hemicellulase (Trichoderma reesei), lipase (Aspergillus oryzae)

Fiber (estimated dry matter content) = 4.4%

Red items when present indicate controversial ingredients

Estimated Nutrient Content
MethodProteinFatCarbs
Guaranteed Analysis36%14%NA
Dry Matter Basis40%16%36%
Calorie Weighted Basis35%33%32%

The first ingredient in this dog food is chicken meal. Chicken meal is considered a meat concentrate and contains nearly 300% more protein than fresh chicken.

The second ingredient is tapioca. Tapioca is a starchy extract made from the root of the cassava plant. This carbohydrate is not only grain-free, it’s also gluten-free.

The third ingredient includes turkey meal, another protein-rich meat concentrate.

The fourth ingredient includes dried eggs, a dehydrated form of shell-free eggs. Quality can vary significantly. Lower grade egg product can even come from commercial hatcheries — from eggs that have failed to hatch.

In any case, eggs are easy to digest and have an exceptionally high biological value.

The fifth ingredient is sweet potato. Sweet potatoes are a good source of complex carbohydrates in a dog food. They are naturally rich in fiber, beta carotene and other healthy nutrients.

The sixth ingredient includes peas. Peas are a quality source of carbohydrates. Plus (like all legumes) they’re rich in natural fiber.

However, peas contain about 25% protein, a factor that must be considered when evaluating the total protein reported in this food.

The seventh ingredient is chicken fat. Chicken fat is obtained from rendering chicken… a process similar to making soup in which the fat itself is skimmed from the surface of the liquid.

Chicken fat is high in linoleic acid, an omega-6 fatty acid essential for life. Although it doesn’t sound very appetizing, chicken fat is actually a quality ingredient.

The eighth ingredient includes dried chicken liver, a dehydrated product made from whole chicken livers. Because it contains about 62% protein and 20% fat, this item makes a favorable addition to this dog food.

From here, the list goes on to include a number of other items.

But to be realistic, ingredients located this far down the list (other than nutritional supplements) are not likely to affect the overall rating of this product.

With five notable exceptions

First, the manufacturer appears to have applied friendly bacteria to the surface of the kibble after cooking. These special probiotics are used to enhance a dog’s digestive and immune functions.

Next, we note the inclusion of flaxseed, one of the best plant sources of healthy omega-3 fatty acids. Provided they’ve first been ground into a meal, flax seeds are also rich in soluble fiber.

Thirdly, this recipe contains fructooligosaccharide, an alternative sweetener1 probably used here as a prebiotic. Prebiotics function to support the growth of healthy bacteria in the large intestine.

Next, we also note the inclusion of enzymes, compounds designed to aid in the digestive process.

And lastly, this food also contains chelated minerals, minerals that have been chemically attached to protein. This makes them easier to absorb. Chelated minerals are usually found in better dog foods.

Brothers Complete Grain Free Dog Food
The Bottom Line

Judging by its ingredients alone, Brothers Complete Grain Free Dog Food looks to be an above-average kibble.

But ingredient quality by itself cannot tell the whole story. We still need to estimate the product’s meat content before determining a final rating.

The dashboard displays a dry matter protein reading of 40%, a fat level of 16% and estimated carbohydrates of about 36%.

As a group, the brand features an average protein content of 38% and a mean fat level of 16%. Together, these figures suggest a carbohydrate content of 39% for the overall product line.

Above-average protein. Average fat. And below-average carbs when compared to a typical dry dog food.

Even allowing for the protein-boosting effect of the peas, this still looks like the profile of a kibble containing a generous amount of meat.

Bottom line?

Brothers Complete Grain Free Dog Food is a grain-free kibble using a generous amount of beef, fish and poultry meals as its main sources of animal protein, thus earning the brand 5 stars.

Enthusiastically recommended.

A Final Word

This review is designed to help you make a more informed decision when buying dog food. However, our rating system is not intended to suggest feeding a particular product will result in specific health benefits for your pet.

For a better understanding of how we analyzed this product, please be sure to read our article, “The Problem with Dog Food Reviews

Remember, no dog food can possibly be appropriate for every life stage, lifestyle or health condition. So, choose wisely. And when in doubt consult a veterinarian for help.

Have an opinion about this dog food? Or maybe the review itself? Please know we welcome your comments.

Notes and Updates

04/21/2011 Original review
12/23/2011 Review updated, higher protein, removed brewers yeast)
12/23/2011 Last Update

Dog Food Advisor IconThe Dog Food Advisor publishes independent reviews to help pet owners make better choices when shopping for dog food.


  • LabsRawesome

    Gordon, don’t you have anything better to do with your time, than come to this site and attack Richard? IT IS REALLY GETTING OLD AND NO ONE WANTS TO READ YOUR MEAN SPIRITED REMARKS ANYMORE. Why don’t you find something else to do with your self. You like potatoes? GREAT! Feed them to your dogs all day if you want. Whatever trips your trigger. But trust me, everyone is tired of your posts, and your attacks on Richard. And the way you think that your opinion is the ONLY correct one! Funny, but despite your attacks EVERYONE seems to be taking Richard’s side. You really should find another hobby!

  • Toxed2loss

    Thank you Marie,
    That was well said. :-)

  • Marie

    Okay, I’m a bit confused now – the argument started with potatoes and has seemed to end with lecturing Richard on how he speaks as a businessman.

    Quite frankly, I find Richard to be honest and straightforward, something that one rarely sees in business nowadays. I know it’s ‘unconventional’, but I wasn’t aware honesty and willingness to discuss his product in such depth is so unconventional as to be deemed unprofessional. I would rather do business with that sort of transparency, and if I lived in Florida, I would be visiting his store. 

    And you know what? I won’t do it undercover to try to catch him saying something. Personally Gordon, I think you simply cannot believe that someone in the pet food industry can actually care about pet health, and your responses to Richard are clearly bias in that regard. It’s one thing to be skeptical, but it’s now obvious you’re arguing just to argue and you really seem to be deliberately trying to get him to lash out at you in frustration so you can hold it against him later. 

    Yes, Richard is selling a product. But out of ALL the representatives of other pet food companies I’ve seen post to this site, HE is the ONLY one that has bothered to continue posting, engage others in debate, and contribute to some very fascinating discussions. I think that says something about his character, and I feel as though you dismiss all of that too easily…because he makes a profit. Richard Darlington isn’t Purina, he isn’t Proctor and Gamble. He’s got a small operation and his goal is to produce the best dry dog food possible. We both agree that raw is best – but people are LAZY. They hardly prepare meals for themselves, let alone their dog. I applaud him for trying to do what’s best for pet nutrition WHILE making money, which ISN’T evil by the way.

    I’m betting Richard’s tongue is bleeding right now. I know mine is.

  • Mike P

    One last thing.If you are a raw feeder then why give a crap about kibble.Keep telling us how raw is superior and get the message across.Fact…kibble is easier for most people in the USA to feed so we should use this site to find the best kibble for our dogs.More Aussies feed raw than kibble.Great good for them and they have very happy dogs for it.Speaking for myself,family,and friends we feed kibble.I envy the ones who get it and feed raw as it is no dobt the very best for our dogs.Just not happening with the people I know.

  • Mike P

    Mike S I made some comments vs Gordan a few months ago that were out of line and regret them now.I will never get mean spirited on this site ever again.I do have a problem with the attacks that are going on from Gordan to Richard.I know that Richard can defend himself but this is getting really old.Do you agree?It just sounds so personal with qoutes like “heard from the downlow” whatever that means.I know that Gordan will rip me for this post but I feel I have to express my feelings on this debate.Richard has IMO always been available on a number of dog food subjects with no mean spirited retorts.He never bashes other foods but does promote Brothers which is fine with me.I tried Brothers but switched because my dogs stool was to hard so I don’t have a vested motive in all of this.The Gordan vs Richard thing just seems personal from Gordans post and very mean.Mike S please let me know if I am out of line with this post.I may be the only one feeling this way.Gordan I don’t wish to get involved with you on this subject so give your keypad a rest and save it for Richard.I think this whole thing is about a potato.

  • Antonio

    I not going to get carried away too much on the back & forth conversation, but I have said this many times before, if anyone has the opportunity to visit a pet food manufacturing plant, then please GO AND SEE THE FACILITY, you will likely be amazed to find out that marketing is about 85% of the business.  There are slight differences in formulations but once they go thru the process of extrusion unless unless vitamins and minerals are added back to ensure that the crude levels on the packaging are accurate then you are pretty much left with dog biscuits.  The final process is what really determines the nutrional adequacy of product A & B, not the fancy labels and definately not the new wave of marketing ” holistic, all natural, organic, etc, etc”.  Bob K is right there’s no such thing as human grade dog food, the truth is nearly all rendered chicken meals etcs.. come from the by products of the human food industry, so any company could make the human grade claim, but once that product has been rendered it’s no longer human grade and automatically loses any previous human grade qualifications it might have once obtained.  I tend to agree w/ Richards statement regarding the difficulty of properly maintaining long term nutrional adequacy of feeding faw unless that person truly understand how to balance the diet, then the dog will suffer some diffencies down the road.  And the argument of dogs eating potatoes , fresh meat , etc.. depends on who is trying to prove what point.  Dogs are OMNIVOROUS scavengers, they can adapt, survive, and thrive on nearly any edibles pending they have proper care  over their lifetime.

  • John

    Hi Gordon…..

    I’ve been following this debate, I was wondering which kibbles do you think are the best and why. thanks in advance, i’m quite terse in comparison to you guys.

  • Gordon

    My response this morning (my time). Now off to resume my work:-

    Wow Richard. You sure like writing pages to swamp out what the other person writes. And you sure like writing “Dr. Mike” when wanting to sweeten him up (No disrespect to you, Mike, but I call it as I see it, and I read Richard like a book).

    Richard, why do you not counter my other facts and just choose to argue the potato case? My opinion on potatoes is unwavering. And why do you repeat yourself re the negatives of potato and I’ve read you state it 1000 times? What’s up with that. You should just refer to a link to your original message. As for me, I’m a fan of potatoes and always will be. And so is the Dogtor! I don’t, have a problem with over flatulence like you say you have for 25 years or so, because of potato etc. Neither does anyone I know.

    You know, I might just have people I personally know in Florida, and you would never be the wiser. It would benefit you to bite your tongue and not get into emotionally charged counter character innuendos in ever so subtle ways, if you want to maintain the appearance of a professional business man. You would take a great leaf out of your competitors examples, and not get into personal struggles with potential customers. When you argue a point or points with me or anyone else here, it is not quite the same as anyone of us who aren’t selling a related product, who are arguing a point.

    I’ve had a neutral and independent witness reading our back and forth (And yes, whilst I know that person, personally, he or she has not shown bias), and states that I’m getting too emotional when arguing my points over something as trivial as an internet exchange, and cringes at the way you become involved with potential customers (Yes myself, and the folks I personally know living in Florida), which is “less than becoming of a professional business man”. To quote what this independent person stated.

    Now as I have before, I could knit pick on some of your product’s ingredients’ negative sides as much as the next ingredient. And will again. I’m giving you my extra time here, when I should be traveling to my next field job. But I will make more time later and go over it all again :)

    Back to my points:-

    * There’s
    constant mention from you and Shawna of how raw feeding is easy to get wrong etc. Although I understand Shawna’s perspective on why she says that, I on the other side, feel it is so easy to GET RIGHT, and hard to get wrong!

    Looks like I’m going to have to do what you do and repeat myself 1000 times to get the message across and help new readers understand just how to get raw feeding right! And that’s what I’m going to do, as was asked of me from Mike a couple of times before. Although, Mike is probably not appreciative of the manner of our current exchanges, it is at least, with out name calling and cussing language, and still remains borderline civil.

    * You stated that 99% of consumers don’t feed raw. That may be the case in America, but not the case in Australia. The percentages here is more like 70 to 30. Now if it is the case that only 1% of American consumers feed their dogs raw, then I can’t imagine that the commercial raw feeding companies could maintain their businesses for too much longer. And the likes of James Pendergast and Steve Brown, need to do more for the American understanding of raw feeding.

    * A final point before I resume, as I have to get back to work, and that is this……Don’t expect everything to go your way and to smooth over everyone then get angry over it, when this doesn’t always happen. Remember, you must take the good with the bad, and accept the fact that you are always going to have skeptics of your intentions as well as being confronted with less than desirable questioning, if you want to expose yourself here, day in day out, as a dog food seller. That’s the nature of human beings, and as my neutral friend put it, “He should tuck that tongue in a wee bit more than he is”. I thought that summed it up well. As for me. Well, I’m not selling anything here and coming here day in day out as a seller. And what you get from me and my opinions is raw honesty, with no financial gain what so ever!

  • Gordon

    Richard’s response:-

    Gordon Your comment about me that you heard on the “down low” is truly unworthy of you, or anyone for that matter. If you come to my store and ask my opinion of a particular kibble or what I think is the best kibble then I would assume you want an honest answer and if that answer is that I find a particular kibble wanting because it has grain, potato, lack of enzymes, lack of effective probiotics or any other reason. or combination of reasons, then I will point that out to my customer, in an effort to use my experience and knowledge to help them. I have a substantial bit of experience that I’m willing to share and I do explain the differences in the kibbles to my customers so they can make their own decision. Did your source on the “down low” inform you of that as well? As it turns out Brothers IS one of the few I can recommend but those recommendations are based on facts and the individual dog’s needs – not sales considerations. For you to suggest otherwise, having never visited the store, or knowing me on any meaningful level is, once again, not really worthy of you and does not really qualify as an exchange of information. My family has invested a great deal in a genuine effort to remedy the problems we observed in thousands of our customers dogs in our store over the years by designing a food that was as good as we could make it; and which, by the way, has been resolving those problems very successfully for our customers dogs – what part of that are you having trouble with? Are you upset that raw isn’t the only food that can nourish a dog or resolve a health problem?I’ll address your comments one paragraph at a time – first on the potato paragraph:You said,  “* Actually, potatoes are something wolves in the wild have indulged in, in rare to occasional cases, and depending on the region. Potatoes are nutrient dense albeit with usually a high GI. And that also varies. Also there are experts like Dr. Bruce Syme that would beg to differ on the fact that some seeds are actually ingested by wild dogs in the wild.”While the occasional wolf “may” have eaten a raw potato (although where he might have found it 100,000 years ago I can’t imagine) that really has little to do with the quality of potatoes that actually make their way into dog food, and are cooked, which is a very different story. Cooked potatoes have a glycemic index from 80 to 100 while white sugar is about 65 and peas are about 40. So when you are figuring out the percentage of Carbs in a dog food it seems prudent to take into account that all Carbs are NOT created equal. Surely the body will react differently to a pea than it will to a potato. So, while Dr Mike cannot go into that kind of detail in these reviews, I do think that the educated consumer would be wise to take into account the source of the carbs and not just lump them into one big (negative) category. Didn’t you mention that wolves ate berries, etc. in the wild?White or Russet potatoes are in the nightshade family and must be kept in a cool place (55 to 65 degrees preferably) then cooked, peeled, and eaten fresh to prevent the toxin SOLANINE from developing or being ingested. The following info on Solanine is found on MedLine Plus site at:http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medline
    Poisonous Ingredient
    Solanine (very toxic even in small amounts)
    Where Found
    The poison is found throughout the plant, but especially in green potatoes and new sprouts. Never eat potatoes that are spoiled or green below the skin. Always throw away the sprouts.
    While you personally may buy nice fresh potatoes, pluck off any new shoots, and even peel them before eating, let’s not pretend that the dog food industry does. The potatoes they use are all too often the potatoes that were rejected from the human food chain because they were old, spoiling, and growing sprouts. These reject potatoes are transported and eventually stored in hot silos and bins, where the toxic conditions worsen, until finally being ground up and added to the dog food. Now are you going to compare a kibble that has 25 to 50% of these potatoes in their formula to a kibble that doesn’t have any?Regarding your wolf eating a raw potato…Regarding your wolf eating a raw potato…Following is a quote from Dr Ben Balzar regarding the Paleolithic diet and the use of RAW potatoes on his site at: http://www.earth360.com/diet_p… are all toxic when raw- there is no doubt about this- it is a fact that no competent source would dispute- they can be extremely dangerous and it is important never to eat them raw or undercooked. These toxins include enzyme blockers, lectins and other types. I will talk about them in detail later as they are very important.I guess those wolves that ate the raw potatoes didn’t feel too good later, which is probably why they really don’t eat potatoes in the wild now – unless they want to get sick.LECTINS: Potatoes are a large source of Lectins which damage the intestinal wall and can lead to leaky gut.http://www.krispin.com/lectin.html“Lectins are hardy proteins that do not break down easily. They are resistant to stomach acid and digestive enzymes.Lectins may bind to the gut wall and damage the gut lining, are not altered by digestive enzymes, and may alter gut permeability and pass through the gut into general circulation. Lectins can cause alterations in gut function that may be related to colitis, Crohn’s Disease, Celiac-Sprue, IBS and gut permeability.Lectin damage to the gut wall may allow other non-lectin proteins to cross undigested into general circulation and cause allergic reactions,…”In addition to all the facts above (versus opinions) I also have accumulated a substantial amount of empirical evidence in observing the effects of different diets in thousands of dogs over the years that confirms that generally dogs do much better when they are not eating potatoes.

  • Gordon

    My response:-

    Richard – The following are points to counter claim what you wrote:- (I think I should copy and paste them under the Brothers thread, so people have the right to see both sides of perspectives.)

    * Actually, potatoes are something wolves in the wild have indulged in, in rare to occasional cases, and depending on the region. Potatoes are nutrient dense albeit with usually a high GI. And that also varies. Also there are experts like Dr. Bruce Syme that would beg to differ on the fact that some seeds are actually ingested by wild dogs in the wild.

    * What in all kibbles, including yours that contravenes the dog’s evolutionary diet, is that it is cooked. That is as simple as that. The number one broken cardinal rule in an evolutionary diet. The “honourable” Dr. Lonsdale rightly states that dogs do their own processing (cooking) as their evolutionary diet (raw and not your food or any processed foods) is consumed and processed through their complete digestive processes.

    * I agree that it’s good for those kibbles that contain high meat content, but should also contain offal and less carbohydrates. Your Kibbles, carbohydrate content is still at around a whopping 36% on a DM basis. This also contravenes the carbohydrate level that a wolf would evolutionarily consume. They consume more like a 10 to 15% of carbohydrate content. That’s a whopping 20 to 25% less than what you offer. Again, another contradiction! I think the truth is that it costs just too much money to compile a higher meat content and to add offal with less complex carbs etc. Your consistent mention of your PhD animal nutritionist and having 30 years experience is a great sales pitch but doesn’t cut it with me, quite frankly. That mention simply doesn’t make your kibble all of a sudden, a substitute for an evolutionary diet.

    I would certainly hope so that you have more experience being an elder statesman and having a pet store. However, the question is, how do you use that experience is also vital. For example, I’ve heard on the down low, that you tend to rubbish other brands to your customers in your store, and just promote your Brothers kibble. Whilst it’s normal to promote one’s product, it is unprofessional to rubbish all your competitors products.

    I have not completed my response to you, as I have more to write, but a good ol’ Barbeque is waiting for me to join.

  • Gordon

    Richard’s response:-

    Gordon

    It does not follow that EVERY kibble contravenes the evolutionary diet. I think that any kibble that includes grains and potatoes (ESPECIALLY the grain and potatoes that find their way into dog food) definitely contravenes the evolutionary diet.

    However, if the kibble includes a high percentage of meat and fat in a healthy proportion, and carbs that are mostly complex, as well as vitamins, minerals, digestive enzymes, prebiotics, and probiotics then I think it is not only possible to claim that a kibble could be similar in benefit to the a raw diet but in many cases (given the practical problem that most people don’t know how to balance the raw diet correctly) it is very likely superior over the long term.

    I have observed hundreds of our customers feed raw over the years and frankly almost all of them eventually run into trouble with it. Do I think that a beautifully balanced and varied raw diet along with lots of probiotics and possibly digestive enzymes is extremely beneficial if you are able to devote enough time to it and understand how to balance it? – absolutely! Do I think that there is more than one person in a hundred or a thousand who can manage that long term? Not in my experience. I have found that a combination of raw with a superior kibble is the best “practical” solution.

    I have infinitely more real world experience with people feeding raw than you do – and while I admire your zeal – I know from observing thousands of dog owners how very few are really able to do what is necessary to feed  raw effectively over the long term. We finally resorted to recommending half raw and half Brothers to blend the advantages of both. Unfortunately the “all or nothing” stance usually ends up heavily weighted on the nothing side.

    I can tell you unequivocally that Brothers IS superior to almost every other kibble out there because I have been intimately involved in what goes into Brothers, as well as other kibbles, and why, and I have the benefit of an amazing wealth of knowledge from a Ph.D animal nutritionist with 30 years experience in research and formulating dog food. When you, or anyone else, states that the 5 star foods are all about the same then I know you do not really understand all that is involved. That you still think that a kibble cannot be made to closely provide nutritional support that is close to raw means you are not keeping up with the industry. It’s not meant to be a criticism – you certainly don’t have the incentive to understand the intricacies of the different kibbles that I have, but it doesn’t change the reality – there can be, and are, substantial differences between them.

    I know it’s hard to believe that a kibble might be superior because the manufacturer makes that claim – I totally get that and consequently don’t blame anyone for being skeptical. But in all honestly I have not seen you express any interest in trying to understand WHY I claim that Brothers is superior. I, on the other hand, have studied extensively why raw is beneficial, as well as the claims made by other kibble manufacturers, and the dog food manufacturing process in general. You seem to have dismissed the POSSIBILITY that someone actually has come along and is not only trying to make the best kibble possible – but might be succeeding – without investigating it. I know I haven’t written a book (yet) like the honorable Dr Lonsdale but I’m very available for anyone interested.

    What about the 99% or more of dog owners who will never feed raw? Wouldn’t it be beneficial to all those dogs if there were a really good kibble available to them? I can assure you Gordon that I am every bit as sincere in my efforts to help dogs, and their owners, as you are. You are providing for one group and I for another.

  • Gordon

    As promised I would Richard, the following several posts, I’m copying and pasting here, as it should be recorded here since it relates to your arguments and product as well as our general augment:-

    All from Dog Food Allergies:-

    Richard – If you know and agree with the dog’s evolutionary diet, than you would know that any kibble including Brothers, no matter what, contravenes the evolutionary diet.

    I know I know…you would say that not everyone will ever accept providing their dog, with a rotationally sourced (balanced) raw meaty diet, and so you want to provide what you claim is the best kibble on the market. I don’t think it is, but it is still worthy of 4 to 5 star rating, if that’s any consolation.

  • John

    Hi Toxed…..

    I wish I’d said that, your response, by far out classed mine. happy new year.

  • John

    Marie…..

    thank god somebody else is seeing this, its getting old, .

  • Mike P

    Thanks Michelle and Jubilee knows it to lol.We are very lucky humans to have such great doggies.By the way,are you clear on the human grade chicken meal thing?? Jeez lol

  • Toxed2loss

    Yes Bob K, I hear what you are saying. The thing is, that is exactly what I heard Richard say from the beginning. Now believe me, I’m all over “source” and “processing,” just like you. And I certainly have a healthy distrust of mainstream industry. But, what I gathered from Richards disclosure statements was that “it started” as human grade chicken, that was then carefully processed into chicken meal. I didn’t get anything different. Ever.

    I recognise that your concern, was the reason for your postings. I’ve noted that it is your concern for other pup’s welfare that drives the majority of your posts… :-) Your concern for others is admirable.

    Richard is demonstrating his concern also. He’s taken pains to develop and produce the best “kibble” that he can. He is not denying that it is kibble, and therefore has certain inherent limitations…like its processed. He admits this and that he advocates kibble w/fresh as better, yet recognizes that many pet owners are going to reach for kibble out of convenience/necessity. So he met the need, for the dogs sake… :-)

  • LabsRawesome

    Hi Richard, I sent you the pics. I made sure to add the extra d this time.lol

  • LabsRawesome

    Hi Mike P. Jubilee is ADORABLE !!!! ( I used to post as Michelle)

  • Marie

    Bob K,

    For real dude, Richard said exactly that – the chicken used to make the chicken meal IS human grade, but the resulting chicken meal MADE from that human grade chicken is NOT due to legality. You can’t buy chicken meal in any grocery store because chicken meal is not meant for human consumption – period. Richard acknowledges this – and goes the extra mile to  make sure to purchase chicken meal made from only chicken approved for human consumption.

  • Bob K

    Toxed2loss – Richard is stretching the truth a little.  He uses rendered formulated chicken meal in his dog food that is not graded for human consumption.  The Chicken meal from Tysons as Richard claims is high quality,  and more than likely sold to many pet food companies.  This is not the same chicken that I buy in a store or eat, its rendered formulated chicken meal product specifically formulated for pet foods,  That does not make it bad.  Lets just tell the truth. Now the chicken that went into the rendered, formulated meal can be human grade, but once again, the meal that goes into the food is nothing like you and I buy in the store.  A rendered formulated product is not the same as fresh chicken that you or I can buy at our local grocery. 

    I seem to to remember earlier discussions about the nutritional value of rendered foods vs. fresh foods.  They are very different.   I have no reason to doubt that Richards product is better than the vast majority on the market but when someone says the chicken he uses is the same as I buy in the store is a little misleading and inaccurate when in fact its a formulated rendered chicken meal that goes into the dog food.    

  • http://BrothersComplete.com Richard Darlington

    Mike P

    I see that patch on Jubilee. I have repeatedly seen those kind of discolorations on dogs go away once they are eating better food.

    Jubilee is looking very good – she has a very engaging smile.

  • Mike P

    Richard if you notice pic in the middle of Jubilee you can see a dark patch on her lower side.That was a picture taken in the back seat of our car day one when we got her from rescue.She was sent home with Pedigree and who knows what she ate in the first few years of her life.The “patch” went away after a few months and has never returned.Probably has something to do wth her getting better foods but not sure.

  • Mike P

    Thanks Mike S you computer geek…it worked!!! YAY

  • http://DogFoodAdvisor.com Mike Sagman

    HI Mike P,

    Once you’re logged in, just hover over the Disqus logo and click “Edit Profile”. Then enter the name (Mike P or whatever name you’d like to display) in the box labeled “Full Name”. Hope this helps.

  • Anonymous

    hi

  • http://BrothersComplete.com Richard Darlington

    Mike P

    Well done! Great to see Jubilee

  • Anonymous

    Now to get my name back lol

  • Anonymous

    Thanks Richard for helping.Now I will try to upload a picture..

  • http://BrothersComplete.com Richard Darlington

    Mike P

    I guess that would depend on how much change you wanted in the stool. You could always mix the first few meal at 25% Allergy and 75% White meat and then adjust from there. Adding a 5 lb bag to a 25 lb bag would be 16.6% to 84.4% ratio.

    To add pictures go up to the DISQUS logo just above and set up a profile. Then when you want to imbed a photo at the bottom of a post you just click below on the “+ Image” sign and choose the photo you want from your desktop or wherever.

  • Mike P

    Thanks Richard so would a 5 lb bag of Alergy mixed with a 25 lb bag of White Meat do the trick?Nice pics and I like the shaved look,very cool.I wish I knew how to post pics on here.

  • http://BrothersComplete.com Richard Darlington

    Hey Mike P

    Good to hear from you. Hope you’ve had a good Holiday so far.

    First, about the hard poop – in the wild many animals have poop that tends toward the hard side, as dogs on a raw diet tend to do. As long as the dog can poop without straining then it’s actually healthy. It’s usually a positive sign that there is a very healthy and active colony of beneficial bacteria in the colon. 

    The healthier the colony of beneficial bacteria in the colon is, the healthier Jubilee is going to be. The good bacteria maintains the health and thickness of the mucosal lining which helps prevent a “leaky gut” condition where contents of the colon gain access to the blood stream causing no end of problems, including systemic Candida if there is a Candida overgrowth condition. Since 80% of her immune system is generated in the mucosal lining, the healthier her colon is, the stronger her immune system will be. As ironic as it may seem for the colon to be the foundation of a healthy body – there it is – another of life’s little ironies.

    I think everyone has become used to stools that are too soft due to feeding our dogs kibble that is full of grain and/or potato, as well as lacking in proper bacterial action (which helps pull the moisture out of the stool while it is in transit and return it to the body as it should) and we think a soft stool is the healthy norm.  

    The firmer stool also helps clean the colon walls. Normally I would think that too loose a stool, if it persists, is indicative of a problem whereas a firm stool is a positive sign as long as the dog has no trouble passing it.

    However, that being said, if you would like Jubilee to have a slightly softer stool then you can accomplish it by adding a little of the Brothers Allergy Formula, which is Turkey and egg, to the Red meat, White meat, or Fish formula. 

    The Allergy formula does not have a prebiotic in it and the other three Brothers formulas do. The prebiotic “feeds” the “encapsulated” probiotics that are in all the formulas (once they activate inside the dog’s colon) to create a healthy, robust colony of beneficial bacteria, that is probably responsible for causing a firm stool as a byproduct of its function. So just add some Allergy formula to one of the other formulas to get the poop consistency you want. 

    Dr Mike has always stood apart from most people in his position by continually exhibiting a willingness to learn, evolve, and improve DFA as his knowledge and experience have dictated over time. DFA has become the leading dog food analysis site on the web as a result of that, I believe, and rightfully so. As more and more plausible and factual input, and empirical evidence concerning the effects of grain and potatoes on dogs, comes to light and is accumulated over time I’m sure he will know what to do and when to do it. In the meantime you can accumulate your experience with a grain and potato free diet to add to the growing store of empirical knowledge.

    Here’s a picture of my son Aaron’s healthy little Chinese Crested who’s got firm poops too. The two on the left were taken when Aaron used to trim him a bit. I’ve also attached a couple photos of him now that Aaron hasn’t cut his hair for a couple months. We all prefer him with the “abominable snowman” look.

  • Mike P

    Hi Richard it sounds like you had a hectic holiday.I and Jubilee wish you a great 2012.As you know we gave the Red Meat formula a whirl and she really loved eating it.Her coat got so soft and her eyes perfect,no tearing.The bump in the road for us was the rock hard poop.She would always poop twice on our evening walks.The first one would be rock hard (would crumble) when I squeezed it.The second poop would be a mixed bag of hard and a little softer.We switched to a different brand and she poops very normal now.There is a catch…Her coat is not as soft and she has some eye tearing.Do you think maybe she needs the Alergy or White Meat formula?I plan on ordering one of those and try to see if maybe the Red Meat wasn’t the right choice.Do you have any thoughts on this?I have so much faith in Brothers and your passion for our dogs that I have to try another formula.Any thoughts you have would be appreciated.Maybe my gal is just a fowl dog.I don’t want to keep giving her the potato.Why doesn’t Mike S give potato a red flag?He even states that potato starch is a quality ingredient.I’m confused again…

  • Dave’s Hounds

    BobK you make an excellent point about all dog food and  meat meals.

  • John

    Mary lou,

    I sure dont want to be mean, but how awesome is brothers complete , Is their a food out there with ingredients like  this, plus the top guy chatting with you, for sure not. I just thought, bob was being a tad out of line, but yes your right Richard can fend for him self. 

  • Mary Lou

    Meant meanness.  : )

  • Mary Lou

    John

    I don’t think you are being mean at all.  There has been some crazy meaness on here from time to time, but it’s one big happy family……..usually.  : )

  • John

    Mary lou….

    I cede, its not in my nature to be mean, but I dont like it when I see others being antisocial

  • Mary Lou

    John

    Bob K has been on this site for a long time.  He is just harrassing Richard, as MANY before him have done, to get specific answers.  I’m sure you can accept that people, from time to time, give him a grilling.  Richard has been taken to the mats many a time.  He can handle it. It doesn’t make it any easier, but he always comes out on top.  : ) 

    Richard

    I am thinking of giving the allergy formula another try for the kibble ball.  So ~ where does your turkey come from?  Haha! : )

    Have been busy; so absent from posting.  May take me awhile to get up to speed with this new format.  : )

  • Toxed2loss

    Bob K,
    Richard didn’t say his chicken meal “is human grade.” he said that it’s manufactured from chicken’s that met the criteria to be processed for human consumption… Just like those tidy Saran wrap and styrofoam packages of breasts, drums and thighs are no longer a chicken. They are a “chicken product.” the product must be manufactured from stock that meets certain criteria. At some point, both the package of chicken leg quarters and the chicken meal had to start as an actual chicken. The chickens themselves are what is graded, BEFORE they are processed in any way… That is when they are graded. During the grading process, which has several stages, culls are removed and redirected. Dead, dying diseased are repurposed… Fertilizer and soil amendments in more conscientious facilities, livestock and pet food in less conscientious facilities. What Richard is assuring you is that he has made sure that he is using only the best quality chicken meal, derived from livestock that was graded PRIOR to processing as fit for human consumption. He was not saying that the chicken meal was, just that the chickens were free of disease and freshly killed, not rotting or putrid… When they were processed into meal. I hope that helps…

  • John

    Bob……

    give it a rest. I think every one is sick of your nonsense, go eat a bag of ol roy and then let us know how YOU feel .